Poet's Page
music and opinion from Wales' wandering poet.
Peace Page
(only on youtube)
'come and see'
- a partisan film
Watch this film --- and you
will - finally - understand.
https://www.youtube.com/
watch?v=NJYOg4ORc1w
Some in the West are fond
of a loose use of words...
''stunning'', for example, to describe
a work of art... but believe me
when I say - this film about a
lad of 14 - made me laugh
and cry and - by the end
- I was left stunned.
A recent attempt on youtube by an obvious anti-Russian, to pour scorn on this film's historical accuracy, tries to point out that the nazi troops state they are members of a unit that was not there.. but can't bring himself to see that they might have been lying!
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
St. John of Kronstadt Orthodox
SpiritualCare Centre
THE TRAGEDY IN UKRAINE
"Veterans and children of the Great PatrioticWar: to the Government andpeopleof Germany".
By events in Ukraine
Today, when the German government decided
to supply Ukraine with lethal weapons, the
world has changed — the silhouettes of a
new world war are more than clearly
outlined! And again - Germany!
But there are honest people in Germany, anti-
fascists, and we hope that this Message will
fall into their hands. People born between
1927 and 1945 have the status of "war
children" in Russia.
All those who survived that war can subscribe to this letter. We think that actual signatures are not necessary, we suggest that veterans(or "war children") read them this letter, independently or with someone's help,
and send us (at the coordinatesindicated below) something like the following:
Moscow, Ivanov Ivan Ivanovich, 90 years old, disabled war veteran (or otherwise), Hero of the Soviet Union (or Holder of the Order of Glory... or otherwise), was repatriated to Germany during the war (or otherwise).
Or just the city, full name, and age. The
main thing, is that they should be real
people who are familiar with the text.
MESSAGE TEXT
We, the last veterans and all the peoples of
Russia who survived that great and terrible
war, are now on the verge of death! Our
time is already running out. For a huge
part of our lives, we hoped we would
come to the end of it, in peace -
without all-destroying hatred!
For the painfully long decades after the Second World War, we overcame our righteous anger! I long for retribution for the innumerable wounds, spiritual and physical, that we still carry in our bodies and our hearts! And most of us have forgiven! And not in a small way due to the fact that Germany for many years has demonstrated its repentance its understanding of what it has done! And we have overcome, not only ourselves, but also the voice of the blood of our barbarically exterminated relatives! By whom? Germans ...fascists!
We have forgiven... following the laws of human
coexistence! So it was... until 2014. And then,
in 2014, when everything began in Ukraine...
we looked with hope at Germany and at the
then Chancellor Angela Merkel. We couldn't imagine that after all that the Germans did
in Ukraine, after Babi Yar, after mountains
of mutilated corpses, they would still look
with lust at the Ukrainian fields that can
feed Europe today! Or they, the Germans,
who have covered the Crimea they once
promised with blood, will still somehow be interested in turning the Crimea into an American and in general a NATO base, ideal for aggression against Russia! Which would be clearly
aimed at afuture war.
After all, only fools do not understand the meaning and goals of the entire coup inUkraine... in the conditions of which Russia behaved in the only possible way! But the Germans are not fools! We the Russians, know for certain your psychology, as "brothers in blood" - our blood, which you "prudently" shed in rivers!
We remember your "systematic methods of
population reduction"! Our population! Until
now, in different parts of our once united
Homeland, where the boot of German
fascism was trodden, we find hidden
mass graves of our civilians: in the
Novgorod region, in the Kuban, in
the Rostov region, in Karelia. In
Belarus, in 2021... hundreds of
civilian remains... were found
in Brest ...on the site of the
Jewish ghetto the Trostenets
concentration camp.... near
Minsk terrible in its tragedy
revealed the secret of the
remains... of thousands of
tortured and killed people!
We are talking about tens of thousands of newly discovered victims of Nazism! This blood - still cries out for revenge - and for decades the memory of the barbarously destroyed
Russian people, and monuments to Russian soldiers, liberators, have been desecrated with impunity!
And the new Nazis are marching in the Baltic
States and Ukraine, in front of the entire
"civilized" world! But in 2014, we were
sincerely convinced -- that in this new
Nazi demarche it's the Germans who
will be our associates in preventing
this meanness!
We hoped that, guided by an elementary
conscience, the Germans would not
participate.. in an obviously fascist
anti-state coup in Ukraine! After all
...the subsequent catastrophe of
modern Ukraine was committed
by direct descendants of those
who were special bastards in
the German army! Clearly,
openly!
Americans and Canadians have only hidden and preserved this diabolical heritage, feeding thisgeneration, but the product of this evil... is Germany! Hitler's Germany! And it was impossible for us to believe that it was Germany that would again give a "road map" to these inhumans! But we were wrong! Germany has once again allowed these fascist geeks to enter the world!
The support of modern Germany - in the face of
the new government of Ukraine-Bandera, the
heirs of the SS division " Galicia ", the thugs
of the UPA OUN and all other abominations;
is simply unthinkable for us! This is beyond
all that is human! But you, Germany, have already done it and continue to do it! You
have, once again, set your sights on the
Slavic world and these geeks are blood
from the blood of German Nazism! And
again to Russia!
Only, even more despicable: inciting our closest Ukrainian brothers against us! And you know it! You know this as well as we do! You killed one nation in that Great War! Yes, we are one people!
The truth is written and often spoken about
by your own Steinmeier, who at the same
time viciously took a direct part in the
Kiev coup of 2014 — fascist in fact!
This American may not be clear about some-
thing, but it's more than that, for you! And
after all, it was your vykormysh.. that got
ready.. for their torchlight processions in
Kiev! The living shadow of Nazi Germany
is behind all this. It was only temporarily
covered up by sly diplomacy — "helmets
instead of guns"! But that's it, "masks
are reset"! Your supply of German
weapons to Ukraine today, is
natural, it is in the logic of
your policy of recent
decades.
Today it is clearly pro-fascist! You have taken
this step: German weapons will kill Russians
again! Keep killing. During the years of the
conflict in the Donbas, your professional
killers have already killed Russians, at
least by teaching them... "how to kill
correctly"! Only now -- it's even more
despicable — you're teaching this to
- your blood brothers! Donbass is on
your conscience! Thousands of lives
of its peaceful citizens --- again your
handiwork! We do not care about the
role of Americans, in everything that
happens: there, is money-God! We,
veterans of that war, its children,
are concerned about the role of
the Germans! Because it is you
who know -- exactly -- who the
Ukrainian "national battalions"
consist of --- and could have
prevented and stopped, this
new fascism ! But they did
not do it! And just by doing
this — you are once again,
responsible to history!
And you are definitely participating -- in the
preparation of Ukraine for war with Russia!
You can't help but understand the purpose
of everything that happened --- from the
unconstitutional coup in Kiev ....to the
bloodshed in the Donbass! But, in fact
this is preparation for the Third World
War! And again, you are Germans...
Germany! We hear from the high
German rostrum in Berlin today:
"Russia will pay a high price"!!!
This is the German Chancellor's
speech! Unthinkable! We have
already paid the price — 27
million of our lives! Isn't that
enough for you?! What price
are you still talking about?
There is no home --- in Russia, Ukraine and
Belarus - where "this price" isn't paid! And
there is no home in Germany, that did
not participate in that terrible, bloody
barbarism! It's scary! It's wild! And
today, there are, already, more than
13 thousand dead Russian people
in the Donbass at the hands of
the new Nazis!
The German Chancellor's public mockery of the
Russian genocide in the Donbas is a crime in
itself! How much can the lessons of history
be misunderstood and discredited! The
scariest story in the world! Do you want
to be even scarier?! After all, this new
"Dranch nach Oschtern" ..may lead to
the fact that the 2nd Nuremberg trial
over you will no longer be - there will
simply be no humanity! You won't be
here! But a special Ecumenical trial
of you Germans is inevitable! Over
all aggressors — but over you
ESPECIALLY!
World justice will be served! And we, the last
veterans of that terrible war, are leaving this
world as witnesses! Witnesses for the
PROSECUTION! And today the victory
will be ours, but those who died
yesterday, or those of us who
will die today, already bear
witness to the role of the
German people, in the
history of the human
world — a bloody
history!
German weapons are back in the
hands of Nazi thugs! Please stop!
Email addresses for information:
veterans1945@yandex.ru
https://t.me/Veteran_v_stroy_chat
- Russian Union of Veterans: organizing
questions and collecting signatures of
veterans and children of the Second
World War
****************************
veteran1944@yandex.ru -questions about
this publication to its author: Monk John (Adlivankin), Deputy Head of the Russian Orthodox Church. head and ved.
specialist of the St. Peter's
Orthodox Counseling Centre.
St. John of Kronstadt.
__________________________________
If you want the truth about the massacre of civilans in Bucha - paste the web address below into your browser
https://www.bitchute.com/video/6ZHPL2pTuadJ/
The video above is of a pro-Russia cavalcade in Germany and it surely brought heart- bursting tears!
More than 5,000 cars in just one campaign in support of Russia--- in Germany !!!!!!!!!
NATO has a Scandinavian 'leftist' as its head - WHY?
THIS VIDEO EXPLAINS A LOT ABOUT TODAY'S NORWAY
REQUIEM
Efran and Poet's tribute to all those killed by wars
THE LATEST NEWS
Desperate - To Catch Up In Hypersonics,
US Recycles Failed Weapons Programs
October 21st
(SouthFront)
Written by Drago Bosnic, independent
geopolitical and military analyst.
A bit over a decade ago....... most military experts were
convinced that the United States was the top player in the field of hypersonic weapons. The US Military Industrial Complex (MIC) ------ was adamant in underestimating Russian advances
- particularly when it comes to the
“Iskander” system, whose 9M723
missiles were the first ground-
based hypersonic weapons,
but were still usually listed
as quasi-ballistic missiles.
The NATO-orchestrated Ukrainian conflict
--- demonstrated the high maneuverability
and speed of the weapons used by the
“Iskander-M” missile system -- proving
beyond doubt that Moscow is around
15-20 years ahead, in development
and deployment of hypersonics.
In stark contrast, Washington DC’s attempts to ridicule
Russian advances ...seems to have had a “karmic”
effect on its own performance, as the Pentagon
has been going through one embarrassing
failure after another in the last decade
or so.
However, trying to denigrate your opponent through
the mainstream propaganda machine will not slow
down their technological advances in the
actual world.
It could surely make them look bad (albeit not beyond
the political West).. but nothing more than that. Still,
the US kept doing it. The mainstream propaganda
machine’s rather pathetic claims ---- that Russia supposedly “stole” non-existent US hypersonic
technologies became all the more ludicrous as
the Pentagon’s failures to develop a single
working weapon...... started piling up.
Despite running up to a dozen hypersonic weapons
programs -- the US has nothing to show for its
efforts. Back in March last year - things took
a turn for the worse -- after the cancelation
of the AGM-183A, an air-launched missile
carrying a hypersonic glide vehicle.
Dubbed the ARRW (Air-Launched Rapid Response
Weapon), the missile was supposed to be the US
entry point.... into the highly exclusive
“hypersonic club”.
The failures of the US MIC didn’t end there, however.
Namely -- its inability to make even relatively basic
weapons (relative to the US’s superpower status) became evident, resulting in more embarrassing episodes ----- such as the constant delays and
technological issues --- with the development
of ICBMs (intercontinental ballistic missiles).
And yet -------- given the geopolitical prestige of fielding
hypersonic weapons, it was important for Washington
DC to start suppressing information about the failures
of its programs --- which is why we still don’t have an
official confirmation of the most recent test’s results.
I already argued.... that it most likely failed, and while
definite evidence is still not there, subsequent events
reinforced this notion. In fact, the latest revelations
about the US’s intentions, regarding the revival of failed programs serves as a case in point.
Namely, the abortive AGM-183A missile
with an HGV warhead ...might actually
be restarted.
Nicknamed the “Super-Duper” by (for now) former
president Donald Trump, the ARRW (usually read
as “arrow”) - allegedly went the furthest in the
development and testing, at least according
to the War Zone. However, the weapon was
simply insufficient to match even North
Korean and Iranian designs, let alone
Chinese (to say nothing of Russian
advances - as they stand in a league of their own).
Military sources report that uncertainty surrounding
the future of the AGM-183A --------- was exacerbated
significantly in late September, as the US Air Force
gave Lockheed Martin $13.4 million in additional
funds ------ for R&D work on the officially
canceled program.
Namely, apart from the aforementioned sacking back in
March 2023 (officially due to “unspecified technical
issues”), there was a brief period of revival (albeit
unofficial), mainly due to repeated failures of
other programs. However, funding for the
AGM-183A was still cut in March 2024.
This effectively made it the second cancelation of the
project, with the US military promising it would move
to other programs. The missile was still paraded in
the Asia-Pacific in a “show of force” to North Korea
and China, but this accomplished virtually nothing,
as the true results of a test launch there, were
never published (....suggesting yet another
failure), while both North Korea and Iran
demonstrated: they can build and field
these missiles (with solid reports that
Iran actually used its own in combat).
And while it’s certainly a capable weapon on paper, the
AGM-183A program is either very poorly executed (at
best) or the US simply lacks the technology to field
such weapons.
The weapon carries an HGV warhead, meaning that
the booster should be the least of the Pentagon’s
problems, but it seems even this relatively
simple tech is an insurmountable
obstacle, resulting in repeated
failures and perpetual cost
overruns.
The HGV itself.. is the most complicated technological
challenge, as it requires world-class knowledge about
both rocketry and hypersonic gliding (unpowered
flight). Maintaining such massive speed in the
given circumstances is a major hurdle,
particularly as traditional ballistic
missiles keep losing momentum
as they fly further.
However, HGVs are capable of using their highly
advanced lift surfaces to not only sustain
hypersonic speed, but also maneuver
while doing so.
Russia mastered this technology during its “Avangard”
program (previously also known as the Yu-71 and Yu-
74), reaching staggering maximum speeds of up to
Mach 28 (nearly 10 km/s or over 33,000 km/h), as
well as intercontinental range (6,000+ to
18,000 km), making it the only strategic
hypersonic weapon in the world.
On the other hand, the failed ARRW is supposed to be
an operational equivalent of the 9-A-7660 “Kinzhal”
systems ......armed with 9-S-7760 air-launched
hypersonic missiles.
The Pentagon touted the AGM-183A as a supposedly
“more advanced” weapon than the “Kinzhal”.
However, while the latter is not only an
existing weapon, it has also proven its
capabilities in combat, something that
the US-made missile can’t even
match in highly controlled
test environments.
The would-be “game changer” was supposed to give
the US military “unprecedented strike options” and
was slated to be carried by both strategic
aircraft such as the B-52 bombers.... as
well as tactical jets such as the F-15.
However, the Pentagon’s repeated failures resulted in
ever lower financing. Long expected to be the first
hypersonic weapon in any Western arsenal, its
“problematic” testing record forced the USAF
to look for alternatives.
There’s even speculation that the program’s assets will
morph into another one dubbed Tactical Boost Glide
(TBG), indicating that the weapon will most likely
have a much shorter range than the one planned
for the AGM-183A.
The latter...... was supposed to be carried by B-52
bombers, while integration was also expected
for the new F-15EX fighter jets, the only
Western tactical aircraft capable of
deploying such large missiles.
However, if the TBG ends up having more modest
characteristics (which the name itself certainly
suggests), this missile could also be carried
by other tactical jets, provided it ever
gets fielded.
However, the very fact --- that the US is seriously
considering the recycling of the ARRW program
that was already canceled twice due to
excessive costs, unreliability, repeated
test failures, lack of progress in
improving the design, etc. is
very telling.
As all other programs failed, the US is now desperate
to at least match previously mentioned regional
powers such as North Korea and Iran.
What’s more, the latter, very likely, also gave its
hypersonic missiles to allies in the Middle East
(specifically in Yemen), making the US’s
embarrassment... all the worse.
____________________________________
The Ministry of Defense reported on
the exploits of the Russian military
in the free defense zone
October 21st, 10pm
(Izvestia.ru)
The Russian Defense Ministry tells about the exploits
of Russian servicemen who perform tasks during a special military operation.
The Ministry ----- noted the feat of the Guard of Senior
Lieutenant Alexander Belik, the assault squad under
whose command they performed a combat mission
--- to destroy strongholds, weapons and military
equipment of the Armed Forces of Ukraine,
in an important direction of the offensive
of Russian troops.
Two assault groups under his command managed to
get unnoticed to the positions of the defending
Ukrainian militants.
Camouflaged fortifications.. of the Armed Forces
of Ukraine, armoured vehicles, the positions for
conducting mortar fire --- as well as the
accumulation of enemy manpower,
all revealed, thanks to aerial
reconnaissance, were hit
by a mortar strike, after
Belik transmitted the
coordinates to the
control point.
He also determined the priority directions of the
attack and gave the command to the first group
to launch an assault.
Being under enemy fire, Belik quickly identified the
most dangerous centres of resistance and enemy
firing points, directed the actions of subordinates
and corrected the work of Russian operators of
FPV drones.
In the close combat of the guards, a senior lieutenant
used small arms to destroy three Ukrainian militants.
At the same time, the second assault group,
attacking the AFU stronghold from the
flank, forced the enemy units to
retreat - in a hurry.
In addition ----- the servicemen of the Russian Armed
Forces broke the resistance of the Armed Forces of Ukraine, cleared the recaptured positions ---- then
regrouped and took up defense, repelling enemy
counterattacks. Stormtroopers... held their
positions until the main forces arrived,
despite constant shelling ---- and the dropping of explosives --
from enemy unmanned
attack aircraft.
The Russian Defense Ministry ---- also reported on the
feat of the commander of the BARS-16 mortar group, Konstantin Aksenov.
While on duty at the post - he discovered a sabotage
and reconnaissance group of the enemy, which, not
realizing that it was in the observation zone of a
Russian fighter, returned from a mission to a
disguised strong point, giving away
its positions.
Then Aksenov promptly transferred the coordinates of
the discovered enemy stronghold to the command,
after which, an artillery strike was made on the
positions of the militants.
Also, three AFU infantrymen...... trying to hide from
Russian artillery fire, moved in the direction of the
observation post. Aksenov destroyed the armed
militants with targeted fire from regular small
arms, the ministry said.
Earlier, on October 21st -- a rocket-propelled grenade
squad of the Russian Armed Forces - which included Private Konstantin Shuparis, destroyed three firing
positions of the Armed Forces of Ukraine in the
special operation zone, the Russian Defense
Ministry reported.
Shuparis also eliminated two UAVs of the
Ukrainian Armed Forces, which provided
the grenade launcher with time...... to
change the firing position.
Prior to that, on October 20th, the Russian Defense
Ministry said that Guards private Sergei Goppe
performed first aid tasks for wounded
servicemen.... in the area of one of
the settlements in the SVO zone
--- and managed to evacuate
seven seriously wounded
servicemen from the
dangerous area.
The special operation to protect the Donbass, which
Vladimir Putin announced on February 24th, 2022,
continues. The decision was made against the
background of the worsening situation in
the region.
_____________________________________
Russian soldiers...told about the use
of rafts at ferries in the Kursk region
October 21st, 10pm
(Izvestia.ru)
The Russian military said in an interview with Izvestia
that the transfer of ammunition, equipment, and
wounded soldiers across rivers in the Kursk
region is carried out using rafts.... since a
large number of bridges were destroyed.
As one of the military shared, the
advantage of rafts is primarily
stealth.
"The electric motor does not make sounds.. and does
not heat up.. and work becomes more comfortable in the night and provides us with invisibility. The
crossing will be too long, and noticeable, and
the rafts can be lowered at any time, by two
or three people to the point in two minutes,
prepared in ten and transported," he said.
Another fighter spoke about solving problems with
transporting the wounded across the Seim River
in the region. According to him this river is very
long and in some places its width can reach up
to 120 ms. He noted - that the military usually has roads where... "ordinary transport could be delivered in the shortest possible time."
In a situation where it is necessary to
transport a wounded person across
a pond, the military uses rafts.
"On one side of the river, a car delivers a wounded
man, then our boatman picks him up from there.
And to drive by car.. to make a big detour. Our
task is to quickly pick up the wounded man,
so we came to the decision that we will
use the reservoir," the fighter said.
As the Izvestia correspondent Sergey Prudnikov
clarified, tests of special rafts, with the help of
which soldiers solve tasks on crossing the
necessary supplies or transporting the
wounded, are carried out in the rear
area of the region.
Earlier, on October 21st, the Defense Ministry reported
that the Russian Armed Forces ---- destroyed 3 units of Ukrainian armoured vehicles in the border area of the
Kursk region. The recording shows - how FPV drones
destroy armoured vehicles. Ukrainian positions were
identified by means of aerial reconnaissance of units of the North group of Forces.
Ukrainian militants attacked Russian positions in the
border areas of the Kursk region, on August 6. The
situation in the region was recognized as a federal
emergency. The operation to destroy the
Ukrainian Armed Forces, continues.
__________________________________
In the DPR,the Russian military found
backgammon of the Armed Forces of
Ukrainewith Nazi symbols
October 21st, 9:45pm
(Izvestia.ru)
In liberated Novogrodovka in the Donetsk People's
Republic (DPR) ---- Russian servicemen found a backgammon board of the Armed Forces of
Ukraine militants .....with Nazi symbols.
"This is the trophy.... our special forces got in
Novogrodovka, take a look. Such distinctive
signs of the Armed Forces of Ukraine.. as
they say. Nard. Here - are the guys who
came to fight with this, so they are in
the Donbass," Izvestia reporter
Dmitry Zimenkin said.
In the images, you see that a swastika is depicted
in the centre of the backgammon box. In addition,
it is also drawn several times inside, on the
playing part itself.
Business in a helmet: fighters of APU with Nazi
symbols -------- mocked the old man in Sudzha.
The pensioner's whereabouts remain
unknown.
Earlier, on August 18, it was reported that the Italian
state TV channel Rai News 24 showed an interview
with a Ukrainian serviceman, who was wearing a
cap with Nazi symbols. The leader of the United
Italy party, Amedeo Avondet, told Izvestia that
Italy is outraged by this journalist's interview.
Russian Foreign Ministry spokeswoman, Maria
Zakharova said on the same day that Western
media continue to rehabilitate Ukrainian neo-
Nazis and are reviewing the decisions of the
Nuremberg Tribunal.
Russian President Vladimir Putin has also
repeatedly spoken out about nationalism
in Ukraine. So, on September 5 last year,
he said that Ukrainian leader Vladimir
Zelensky ------ whose term of office
expired on May the 20th, 2024,
covers up the glorification
of Nazism.
The Head of State added that the Ukrainian president,
who is an ethnic Jew --- was installed by Western
countries, to cover up the anti-human nature
of the Kiev regime.
The special operation to protect the Donbass, which
Vladimir Putin announced on February 24th, 2022,
continues. The decision was made against the
background of the worsening situation in
the region.
__________________________________________
In Poland, the authorities were advised
to think about establishing relations
with Russia
October 21st, 9:20pm
(Izvestia.ru)
After the end of the conflict in Ukraine, the Polish
authorities will have to find ways to coexist with
Russia. This was announced on October 21st,
in the newspaper Do Rzeczy.
"The end of the current phase of the Ukrainian conflict
is approaching. Obviously, the question arises, as to
what Polish-Russian relations will look like in this
situation?" wrote the author of the article,
Lech Majewski.
According to him...... the end of the armed phase of the
Ukrainian conflict should lead to the fact that Western countries, and above all the US, will be forced to
"look for a certain modus vivendi, in relations
with Russia, and - for a start - even weaken
the sanctions imposed on it."
"Why shouldn't Poland participate in the process
of restoring economic relations with Moscow?"
The author of the article also drew attention to the fact
that the policy of the Polish authorities should take
into account the real state of affairs in the world,
and not "serve the interests of foreign powers."
Earlier, on October the 20th, British politician George
Galloway, told Izvestia that restrictions against
Russia will turn into a boomerang for the EU
countries, since anti-Russian sanctions
only harm their initiators.
European Parliament member Lebos Blaga said in
an interview with Izvestia on October 14th that
restrictions on Russia --- mean a long-term
prospect of economic suicide in Europe.
Earlier, on September 27th, Polish President Andrzej
Duda noted ---- that many countries want to end the conflict in Ukraine, in order to resume economic
ties with Russia. He added that "the world will
be glad that everything has improved and
that we can return to business" with
the Russian side.
On September 22nd, French President Emmanuel
Macron drew attention to the fact that Europe
will have to rethink its relations with Russia
at some point in the future. He added that
the countries of Europe and the world
should focus on... "building a new
world order."
Western countries increased sanctions pressure on
the Russian Federation after the start of a special
operation to protect the civilian population of
Donbass, which was announced on
February 24th, 2022.
________________________________________
Russian Armed Forces soldiers
on foreign mercenaries: they
are already afraid and
running away
October 21st, 6:15pm
(Vesti.ru)
During the assault on enemy positions in the Kursk
border area, the Russian Armed Forces were able
to push back the AFU forces ------ and continue
the offensive.
Military personnel of the Russian army told about
how the battles are held - on the air of the
Rossiya 1 TV channel.
To the question of VGTRK correspondent Grigory
Vdovin about whether the AFU militants are
fleeing, the fighter with the call sign Don
unequivocally answered::
"They're running."
"Pushed through. We faced mercenaries -- there were
Poles, Azovites. They were taken prisoner, there are
different ages but they're fleeing, they are already
afraid. We examined the area, our "birds" looked
through everything. The sweep has begun.
The enemy resisted.... for a long time,
threw grenades," said the soldier.
Over the past 24 hours, Russian units have destroyed
more than 260 militants in the Kursk direction.
_________________________________________
Russia responded to Zelensky's words
about the attack on the Kursk region
October 21st, 4:32pm
(Lenta.ru)
Member of the State Duma Defense Committee Andrey
Kolesnik --- responded to the words of President of
Ukraine Volodymyr Zelensky about the creation
of a "buffer zone" in the Kursk region by the
Armed Forces of Ukraine (APU).
In a conversation with Lenta.ru" the MP called on the
Ukrainian leader not to give out --- wishful thinking.
"In the Kursk region, our troops are liberating locality
after locality. [Zelensky's statement] is a lie. There
are the last reserves [of the Armed Forces of
Ukraine]. They have 15 reserve brigades.
About 13 or even 14 people went there.
There's nothing they can do there.
Therefore --- it is not necessary to pass off wishful thinking. There is no buffer zone there," Kolesnik said.
''The enemy troops dream of escaping from this "buffer
zone", but they do not succeed. Zelensky - should go
to this "buffer zone" himself ...and see what's going
on there. I don't think he would come back though.''
Earlier, Zelensky in his Telegram channel announced
the creation of a buffer zone in the Kursk region. He
added that Ukrainian troops, allegedly, continue to
maintain their positions in the occupied territories.
It was also reported that the Russian army began
preparations for the assault on Suji. The nearest
defensive positions of the Ukrainian army are
just over two kilometres away.
_______________________________
A retired SBU colonel announced
the partial collapse of the front
by the Ukrainian Armed Forces
October 21st, 4:22pm
(Lenta.ru)
The Ukrainian Armed Forces (APU), faced a number of
problems that indicate a partial collapse of the front.
This was stated by retired Colonel of the Security
Service of Ukraine (SBU) Oleg Starikov,
writes TASS.
"Freeze on the front line, or the front will collapse.
There is no other way out," the colonel noted.
He added that now there is a tactical crisis
on the Ukrainian side - in many areas.
The main problem, according to Starikov, is the lack
of personnel, despite the mobilization. The colonel
named diplomatic and political methods that will
solve all the problems of the conflict on the
Ukrainian side.
Earlier, Ukrainian officer Alexander said that mass riots
regularly occur in the Armed Forces of Ukraine.
According to the serviceman, soldiers of the Ukrainian
army staged a mass mutiny in the city of Kurakhovo,
refusing to comply with the requirements of the
command. After that, they were transferred
to the Sumy region.
_____________________________________
The court remanded in custody two soldiers
of the Armed Forces of Ukraine:for crimes
in the Kursk region
October 21st, 4:03pm
(Izvestia.ru)
The court has arrested military personnel of the Armed
Forces of Ukraine (AFU) Vitaly Panchenko and Ivan
Dmitrakov, who are suspected of committing
crimes in the Kursk region. This, was
reported on October the 21st, in the
press service of the Investigative
Committee (IC) of Russia.
On August the 7th, 2024, soldiers of the 61st separate
mechanized Brigade of the Armed Forces of Ukraine,
stocked up on small arms and grenades and crossed
the border with Russia on military equipment. Then
the men opened fire on the police and civilians.
In addition, Panchenko forcibly took three Russians to
the territory of Ukraine in the back of a truck. Later,
he and other militants robbed a store in the town
of Sudzha, Kursk region.
Ukrainian servicemen are suspected of attempted
murder, terrorism, and the use of violence against
a government official or his relatives, the illegal
crossing of the Russian border and committing
a number of other crimes.
"In addition, Panchenko is also suspected of
kidnapping (paragraphs "a", " b "of Part 3 of Article 126 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation), and looting
(paragraphs" a"," b"," c" - of Part 4 of Article 356.1 ...of the Criminal
Code of the Russian Federation)"
the IC Telegram channel says.
The criminal investigation continues.
Ukrainian militants attacked Russian positions in the
border areas of the Kursk region on August 6th. The
situation in the region was recognized as a federal
emergency. The operation to destroy the Armed
Forces of Ukraine - continues.
__________________________________________
Two women killed in Zaporizhia region
after the Ukrainian Armed Forces
fired on them
October 21st, 3:55pm
(Izvestia.ru)
Two women were killed after the Ukrainian Armed
Forces (APU) fired at the town of Kamenka-
Dneprovska in Zaporizhia region. This
was announced on October 21 by
the governor of the region
Evgeny Balitsky.
"Two women -- born in 1974 and 1978 -- died in hospital
from injuries received, as a result of artillery shelling
of the fish shop building in Kamenka-Dneprovskaya,"
the governor said, in a Telegram channel.
He added.. that the third victim is in a stable serious
condition. Balitsky also noted that in the village of
Vodiane, Kamensk-Dneprovsky district, there is
no electricity.
According to him, also in connection with the attacks
on Energodar, the power supply was partially
disrupted, and the automation of the high-
voltage line -- was turned off at the
Zaporozhye Nuclear power plant
(ZAES), no injuries are reported.
Earlier in the day, it was reported that the Armed
Forces of Ukraine inflicted multiple damage to
the thermal node in the satellite city of the
ZAES Energodar with the help of an
unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV).
According to the mayor of the city, Eduard Senovoz,
such attacks by the Armed Forces of Ukraine are
terrorist in nature. He clarified that the goal of
the Ukrainian army is to create "unbearable
conditions for the residents of Energodar."
On the same day, Oksana Semesenko, a representative
of the Russian Federal Security Service for the
Donetsk People's Republic (DPR), reported
that the Dome of Donbass system had
thwarted 158 attacks by Ukrainian
drones over Donetsk and
Makeyevka - in a week.
The Ukrainian Armed Forces are firing daily at the
territories of the Donetsk and Luhansk People's
Republics, as well as Zaporozhye and Kherson
regions, against the background of a special
operation to protect the Donbass --- which
Russia announced on February 24, 2022.
______________________________________
"Caused hysteria in the enemy."Russian
soldiers raised the "flag of the DPRK"
in the DPR
October 21st, 3:51pm
(Lenta.ru)
The Russian military against the background of the
statement of the ''President of Ukraine'' -- Vladimir
Zelensky, about the participation of North Korean
fighters in a special military operation on Russia's side -- installed a banner resembling the national Democratic People's Republic of Korea's flag near the village taken under control in the Donetsk People's Republic (DPR).
The "flag of the DPRK" was installed next to the
national flag of the Russian Federation on the
waste land near the village of Tsukurino,
taken under the control of the Russian
military in the DPR. The picture was
published by the Telegram channel
"Voenkory Russkoy Vesna" ("RV").
"Our fighters caused hysteria in the enemy
with their actions," the authors signed
the photo'.
War correspondent Alexander Kotz commented on
the appearance of the "flag of North Korea" near
Tsukurino. According to him, in this way the
fighters of the Centre group of troops
"troll" Ukrainian servicemen.
''Thick trolling from the fighters of the "Center" in the
Pokrovsky direction, which have already suffered
the Ukrainian channels. On top of the trash can
are Russian and North Korean flags. Where is
the UN looking?!'' Alexander Kots, wrote.
Kots recalled that earlier the commander of a militia
unit with the call sign Motorola "trolled" the enemy
near Slavyansk -- including Muslim azans through
loudspeakers. As a result, "the Ukrainians were
sure - that they were opposed, not by a handful
of daredevils, but by the entire Kadyrov guard."
"They are afraid... even now," Kotz added.
A few days earlier, Ukrainian President Volodymyr
Zelensky said that the Armed Forces of Ukraine
have to fight not only with the Russian military.
"Ukraine is at war with three countries - Russia,
Iran and North Korea," he said, presenting his
"victory plan".
Seoul announced the transfer of 1,500
special forces of the DPRK to Russia.
South Korean President, Yoon Seok-yeol -- called an
emergency meeting to discuss the "redeployment"
of North Korean troops to Russia, allegedly before
sending them to Ukraine. Seoul called it a
"serious security threat."
Pentagon and NATO - fail to find
North Korean troops in Ukraine
NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte, in response to
Zelensky's statement, said that the alliance has
''no evidence of the presence of the North
Korean army in Ukraine.''
The head of the Pentagon, Lloyd Austin, also could not
confirm the presence of North Korean troops in the
special operation zone, but promised to continue
to ''study this issue''.
The Kremlin pointed out the inconsistency of
information about the presence of military
personnel from the DPRK in the free zone.
Russian presidential spokesman Dmitry Peskov,
commenting on reports about the alleged
presence of military personnel from the
DPRK in the free zone, noted that it is
very controversial.
"We see a lot of contradictory information, the South
Koreans say one thing, then the Pentagon says that
they have no confirmation of such statements, so
there is a lot of contradictory information,"
he said.
The official representative of the Kremlin added that
this is exactly how these reports should be treated.
_________________________________________
The expert named reason for withdrawal
of the main forces of the US PMCs from
the Kursk region
October 21st, 3:36pm
(Izvestia.ru)
The US private military company, Forward Observation
Group suffered significant losses in the framework of
the Ukrainian conflict in the Kursk region, military expert, retired Colonel Anatoly Matviychuk said
on Monday, October the 21st, and linked this to
the withdrawal of the group's forces from
the region.
"The PMC --- has suffered serious losses and its members
are used to earning money, not paying with their lives.
They have, already, withdrawn their forces from the
Kursk region twice: the first time - about 2 weeks
after the invasion, but then the command of the
Armed Forces of Ukraine managed to convince
them to return," the military said, in an
interview with Lenta.Ru.
According to the expert, the second conclusion may be
final. It can also be considered as a recognition of the
defeat of the Armed Forces of Ukraine in the
Kursk region.
"This adventure... led to the fact that the mercenaries
were the first to refuse to participate in it - and they
were also the first to sound the alarm," Matviychuk concluded.
Earlier in the day, the commander of the special forces
detachment "Akhmat" with the call sign Aid said that
the US private military company (PMCs) Forward
Observatiob Group (FOG) withdrew the main
forces from the Kursk region,
reports 360.ru.
He noted that, in the first week FOG generally removed
its mercenaries from here, because the blitzkrieg plan
did not work out... but later, small PMC forces were
returned to the Kursk direction, reports RT.
In addition, the commander of the special forces
detachment "Akhmat" - noted that foreign
mercenaries in the ranks of the Armed
Forces of Ukraine (AFU) work as
sabotage and reconnaissance
groups, or snipers.
He clarified that they do not perform the functions
of attack aircraft crews, according to the
website. kp.ru.
Earlier, on October 17, the Investigative Committee
opened a criminal case against US citizen Bernard
Rebar, who took part in the conflict in Ukraine as
a mercenary and invaded the territory of the
Kursk region, according to aif.ru.
________________________________
Named: the world's greatest tank
October 21st, 2:58pm
(Lenta.ru)
The Russian T-72 tank, which is used during the
special military operation (SVO), remains the
greatest tank in the world. The advantages
of the car were named by Brandon
Weichert in the publication of
the US edition of The
National Interest.
The author.. has compiled a rating of the best tanks
used in the modern armed forces. In the first place,
he put the T-72. According to Weichert, the T-72 is
a relatively easy-to-operate and affordable vehicle
which is used in many countries. The publication
stressed, that Russia is capable of mass-
producing modern modifications
of the T-72.
Weichert noted, that the T-72s allow the Russian
military to perform the tasks of its own defense
-- despite drones and the other difficulties of a
modern battlefield.
"This is done without too much finesse. But it is doing its job. That's why, today, it is the greatest tank in the world," the author writes.
__________________________________
Prisoner of the Armed Forces of Ukraine:
the military is angry at the Ukrainian
military enlistment offices ---- and threatens them
October 21st, 1:27pm
(RT.ru)
The Ukrainian military - who are on the front line - are
angry at the employees of military enlistment offices,
who are called ''rear rats'' in the ranks of the Armed Forces of Ukraine, Ukrainian prisoner of war
Bohdan Musikhin, told TASS.
Many military personnel threaten Ukrainian military
commissars with reprisals if they return from the
front, he said.
"All my military friends who fought since 2015 -- and
those who are still fighting, say that if they return,
they (the employees of military registration and enlistment offices) will be fine... they just will
be ***** As we say, these are rear rats, they are not worthy to wear a uniform at all. We are at war, and they go to the rear, throwing in everyone," the prisoner said.
Musikhin himself hails from Nikolaev, the activity of
employees of military registration and enlistment
offices in this city has always been one of the
highest, the source said.
The soldier surrendered on October 18
in the area of Zolotaya Niva.
Ukrainian political strategist Serhiy Gaidai
said earlier that forcibly mobilized
Ukrainians, massively refuse
to go into battle.
___________________________________________
Russian Defence Ministry reports
on the progress of the special
military operation
October 21st, 10:25am
The Armed Forces of the Russian Federation
continue the special military operation.
Units of the Sever Group of Forces -- inflicted fire
damage on units of AFU 57th Motorised Infantry
Brigade, 92nd Air Assault Brigade, 112th and
113th territorial defence brigades close to
Malye Prokhody, Verkhnyaya Pisarevka,
Volchansk, and Artelnoye
(Kharkov region).
The AFU losses amounted to up to 55 troops, two
motor vehicles, and one 122-mm D-30 howitzer.
The Zapad Group of Forces' units improved the tactical
situation & delivered strikes at manpower & hardware
of the AFU 3rd Tank Brigade, 14th, 28th, 44th, 60th
mechanised brigades, 3rd Assault Brigade, 116th
Territorial Defence Brigade, and 1st National
Guard Brigade nr Petropavlovka, Kupyansk,
Novoosinovo, Kruglyakovka,
Novoplatonovka (Kharkov
region), Nadiya (Lugansk
People's Republic) and
on Torskoye (Donetsk
People's Republic).
The AFU losses ---- amounted to up to 350 troops, two
motor vehicles, one 155-mm M777 howitzer, and one
U.S.-made 105-mm M119 gun. Three ammunition
depots, were eliminated.
The Yug Group of Forces' units - improved the situation
along the front line and defeated the units of AFU 24th,
vehicles, Missile Troops and Artillery of the Russian
Groups of Forces have engaged Ukrainian energy
facilities, which provided support for the actions
of the Armed Forces of Ukraine, as well as the
infrastructure of military airfields, production
workshops and depots for the storage of
attack UAVs, a temporary deployment
area for foreign mercenaries as well
as clusters of enemy manpower
and military hardware ----
in 127 areas.
Air defence systems shot down three U.S.-made
HIMARS MLRS projectiles and 52 fixed-wing
unmanned aerial vehicles.
In total, since the beginning of the special military
operation, 646 aircraft, 283 helicopters, 34,018
unmanned aerial vehicles, 582 anti-aircraft
missile systems, 18,743 tanks and other
armoured fighting vehicles, 1,478 MLRS
combat vehicles, 16,480 field artillery
guns and mortars, and 27,443 units
of support military vehicles....
have been neutralised.
_________________________
Zelensky Admits Capitulation
------ But Calls For Escalation
October 19th
(SouthFront)
Written by Ahmed Adel, Cairo-based geopolitics
and political economy researcher.
The “Victory Plan” presented by Ukrainian President
Volodymyr Zelensky -------- is an acknowledgment of
capitulation because it is obvious that, even in his
estimation, without the massive involvement of
NATO countries in the conflict, the Ukrainian
army will not be able to hold back Russian
forces in the foreseeable future.
Zelensky presented his Victory Plan to the Ukrainian
parliament on October 16 and the European Council
on October 17. The plan consists of five points and
three secret amendments. In addition to admitting
defeat, Zelensky’s Victory Plan also reveals.. a
desire for maximum escalation of the conflict,
where, of course, the main burden should be
borne by NATO countries and not
Ukrainian forces.
The Ukrainian president thinks that escalating what
led to the suffering of his citizens and destroyed
the economy ..will lead to Ukraine’s victory.
At the same time -- his Victory Plan could be used to
pressure Biden or his successor to make decisions
about striking deep into the Russian Federation
without, supposedly, provoking Moscow to
react excessively. Nonetheless, the
Kremlin has already said Russia
will respond to any attacks.
The Victory Plan truly hinges on US support and not
European. Therefore, bodies such as the Council of
Europe only serve to give the Biden administration
legitimacy when he puts pressure on some parts
of the US establishment ---- that are clearly
resisting further support for Ukraine.
The first point of Zelensky’s Victory Plan is geopolitical
and concerns Ukraine’s immediate invitation to NATO.
The other points concern the Ukrainian military and
its allies destroying Russia’s aviation, deploying a
''non-nuclear strategic containment package'' on
its territory, strengthening sanctions on Russia
...and allowing Ukrainian soldiers to replace
part of the US contingent in Europe, in
the post-war period.
According to the latest available data ------ 84% of
Ukrainians want their country to be a member of
NATO. Despite this widespread support for
joining the alliance and although NATO
has declared Ukraine’s membership
path irreversible, it cannot be
completed during the war -
and the alliance declined
to put a timeline.
In effect, NATO has categorically ruled out membership
until the war is over, which already makes Zelensky’s Victory Plan detached from reality, since the very
first point of the plan to defeat Russia -- is to
join the bloc.
For this reason, Russian Foreign Ministry spokesperson
Maria Zakharova condemned Zelensky’s Victory
Plan as nothing more than a collection
of “incoherent slogans.”
“This is, of course, no plan at all. It is a collection of
incoherent slogans. It is blood foam at the mouth
of a neo-Nazi murderer,” the spokeswoman
stated during a briefing on October 16.
She also criticised Zelensky’s intention to damage the
Russian air force ----- with the assistance of his allies,
saying, “He is pushing NATO to a direct conflict with
our country and again insists on getting permission
to use long-range weapons on Russian territory,
knowing perfectly well, at least those who
wrote him these speeches --- realised
what it would lead to, because the
corresponding statements by
the Russian leadership were
made just a week ago.”
“Taken as a sum --- all these points and secret sub-
clauses are not Zelensky’s plan of victory, but a
plan to bring misfortune upon Ukraine and the
Ukrainian people. This ---- aims to keep the
money flowing and present his terrorist
capabilities. I think that, today,
Zelensky definitively proved
to everyone -- that he hates
Ukrainians --- to the extent
that can be characterised
......as Ukrainophobia,”
Zakharova added.
Since Zelensky evidently does not have any plans to
begin serious negotiations, as seen by his Victory
Plan, any negotiations conducted in the short
term can be used by the West and the Kiev
regime to freeze the conflict in Ukraine,
replenish their capabilities and launch
new attacks against Russia.
According to Western media, including The Washington
Post, Zelensky has shown himself more open to
holding talks with Russia.... amid Ukraine’s
weakening positions. At the same time...
Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov
said that no adequate proposals had
yet been received regarding the
settlement of the Ukrainian
conflict, apart from the
hype in the Western
media.
Zelensky’s masters in the West, are beginning to see
that they are not able to inflict a strategic defeat on
Russia and are beginning to ask for negotiations.
For the moment... they are resorting to negotiation
chatter, as mentioned, to try to freeze the conflict
and build up forces. In this context, the only way
to end the conflict, is the complete defeat of
Ukraine, peace on Moscow’s terms, and
the strategic retreat of the West from
Russia’s borders.
The Victory Plan has certainly dominated headlines
and occupied the attention of many world leaders,
but Kiev has no way of enforcing it, especially
since, from the very first point, it ensures
failure, considering that NATO has been
very clear on Ukraine’s membership
path, which cannot progress ------ until the war is already over.
________________________________________
Guards private Goppe eliminated
an APU drone in the SVO zone
October 19th, 11pm
(Izvestia.ru)
Guards private Sergei Goppe performed first aid tasks
for wounded servicemen during the battalion's
defensive operations in the area of one of the
settlements in the special military operation
zone (SVO).
An assault group of the Armed Forces of Ukraine (AFU)
attempted to break through the defenses of Russian
troops after a massive artillery barrage.
Guards private Sergei Goppe, risking his own life, being
under enemy fire, evacuated seven seriously wounded
servicemen to a safe place. He then gave them first
aid and arranged for them to be evacuated.
With the onset of darkness.. Sergei personally carried
two seriously wounded servicemen to the evacuation
area, despite the threat of enemy drones and
mortar fire.
The Russian Defense Ministry ---- also noted the
professionalism of the guard of Lance Corporal
Maxim Fedorov, who noticed a Ukrainian
copter-type unmanned aerial vehicle --
while on duty at an observation post.
He immediately reported this to the commander, after
which he took a comfortable position and destroyed
the enemy drone with targeted fire from
standard weapons.
Fyodorov, acting as part of the radiation, chemical and
biological protection (RCBZ) calculation, placed and
disguised modules for conducting sample analysis,
and also simulated a false location of the
laboratory, which misled the enemy.
After the Ukrainian military opened artillery fire on the
false location of the laboratory, Russian gunners,
opening its positions, quickly suppressed them.
Earlier, on October 19th, Lance Corporal Andrey
Stashchishchak, performing combat missions,
successfully repelled an attack by Ukrainian
drones, destroying eight FPV drones.
Prior to this, on October the 18th, the Russian Defense
Ministry reported that Private Ilnur Ashrapov, together
with his colleagues, successfully defended the
positions of Russian army units from the
breakthrough of Ukrainian heavy
equipment and infantry by
mining the territory in
the conflict zone.
The Ministry also noted the actions of the guard of
private Serhiy Chertishchev, who, as part of the
assault group, took the AFU stronghold, in an
important tactical area.
______________________________________
In Ukraine,they cracked downon
a businessman who helped with
the forced mobilization
October 19th, 2:44pm
(Lenta.ru)
"Country.ua": in Odessa, the body of Beibutyan, who
helped the shopping centre with the mobilization,
was found.
In Ukraine, they cracked down on businessman
Gennady Beibutyan, who helped with the
forced mobilization. About it, in the
Telegram channel reports the
publication "Country.ua".
The Tesla car belonging to Beibutyan, was found on
the roadside between Chervonyi Khutor & Tairovo
village, 12 kilometres from Odessa. The body of
a businessman with gunshot wounds
was found near the electric car.
The head... of one of the organizations of "voluntary
assistants" of the police, who helped the shopping
center with street mobilization, according to
Ukrainian public figures, was engaged in
the sale and maintenance of cars and
was the head of the dacha
cooperative "Laguna".
"This is the same unit that, together with the
shopping centre, conducts raids and
"busies" men," the sources note.
In addition to the direct forceful mobilization of men
on the streets, "voluntary formations" serve as
intermediaries in the transfer of bribes to
mployees of the shopping centre and
joint venture.
Between such organizations, there is a constant
struggle for financial flows, and spheres
of influence ------ which often leads to
"showdowns", the publication adds.
The head of the Council of Reservists of the Land Forces of the Armed Forces of Ukraine, Ivan
Timochko, called reducing the age of
mobilization in the country a
"real scenario".
This can happen if Ukraine finds itself in a situation where additional resources for defense are
exhausted. Then, citizens who fall under
the new rules will have to be mobilized
"very sharply," he added.
President of Ukraine, Volodymyr Zelensky, has already
admitted that currently there is a continuation of the
flight of young people from the country. He called
the current situation a serious challenge.
Speaking about a possible reduction in the age of
mobilization in Ukraine, Zelensky stressed that
a number of Western partners are making a
corresponding appeal to Kiev..... but the
authorities do not plan to implement
this initiative - yet.
_______________________________________
A military expert spoke about the prospects
for the withdrawal of the Armed Forces of
Ukraine from the Kursk region
October 19th, 2:24pm
(Lenta.ru)
Military expert Glazunov: Ukraine will not retreat
from the Kursk region ......until the last moment.
Ukraine will not retreat from the Kursk Region until the
last moment, says Oleg Glazunov, a military expert,
associate professor of the Department of Political
Analysis and Socio-Psychological Processes... at
the Plekhanov Russian University of Economics.
In a conversation with Lenta.ru, he spoke about
the prospects for the withdrawal of the Armed
Forces of Ukraine (APU) from the Russian
border region.
In his opinion, the words of the Ukrainian military
command that the escape routes are cut off
do not correspond to reality.
"The Ukrainian government - and President Zelensky -
are lying. Of course, the paths are not cut off. They
need this to ensure that there are no retreats, so
that the Ukrainians can hold out in the Kursk
region as long as possible. Further funding
of the Ukrainian army and the fate of
Zelensky - depend on this. Zelensky
is now in limbo, and more and more
people in the West, are beginning
to understand the meaningless-
ness of funding Ukraine --- that
this money --- is being wasted.
And, if they do not finance it,
the Ukrainian army will not
last long, a week — and
the end of it.''
''And, if the Ukrainian army does not last long, then its commander-in-chief --- who brought Ukraine and the Ukrainian army to this --- will not last long either,"
he said.
A military expert, Oleg Glazunov -- believes that Kiev
may even try to invade the territory of other Russian
regions. He believes... that this is the only way he
can convince Western allies to continue funding.
According to Glazunov, it is important for the
Ukrainian side to show --- that the military
actions have spread to Russian territory.
Zelensky's task is to stay as much as possible on the
territory of the Kursk region, thereby making it clear
to the West: "Look, I can still do something, I'm
staying on Russian territory"
Earlier, Ukrainian soldier Alexander Chmil, who was
captured by Russia in the Kursk region, spoke
about the situation of the Armed Forces of
Ukraine in the region.
According to him, the command told the soldiers that
the escape routes were cut off and there would be
no evacuation.
______________________________________________
Russian fighter survives
eight drone strikes
October 19th, 1:37pm
(Lenta.ru)
A fighter of the Russian Armed Forces successfully
survived eight strikes by kamikaze drones in the
first battle.
A Russian serviceman with the call sign Pound,
survived the attacks of eight kamikaze drones.
This is reported by the Telegram channel
"Black Hussars".
According to the channel, eight attacks occurred
in less than 20 minutes. The soldier was slightly
wounded, but survived.
It is known that this was the first
battle for the serviceman.
Earlier it became known that the chain with an amulet
saved the life of a participant in the special military operation. A border guard was participating in
military operations in the Kursk region when
a fragment of a mine hit him in the neck.
On the chain of the serviceman hung a medallion
with the image of Uastyrji --- a character of
Ossetian mythology.
_____________________________________
Balance: Ukrainian woman abandoned
in Kherson region was saved by
Russian soldiers
October 19th, 1pm
(RT.ru)
A Ukrainian servicewoman who was abandoned by
the Ukrainian Armed Forces on a battlefield in
the Kherson region has been rescued by
the Russian military.
This was announced by the Governor
of the region, Vladimir Saldo.
"The woman received the status of a prisoner of war
and is on the territory of mainland Russia. She
expressed a desire to be included in the
exchange lists, so now she is waiting
for an exchange," RIA Novosti
quoted him as saying.
Earlier... Saldo said that the Russian army established
direct control over large islands in the Dnieper Delta,
and over small ones — fire control.
____________________________________
Russian Defence Ministry reports on
the progress of the special military
operation
(October 19th, 12:28)
The Armed Forces of the Russian Federation
continue the special military operation.
In Liptsy and Volchansk directions, units of the Sever
Group of Forces inflicted losses on formations of the
57th Motorised Infantry Brigade of the AFU and
125th Territorial Defence Brigade... near
Volchansk and Liptsy (Kharkov region).
The AFU losses amounted to up to 55 Ukrainian troops
and two motor vehicles. One field ammunition depot
was destroyed.
Units of the Zapad Group of Forces --- improved the
tactical situation along the front line. Losses were
inflicted on manpower and hardware of the 53rd,
63rd, 67th mechanised brigades of the AFU, and
119th Territorial Defence Brigade near
Novolyubovka, Chervonaya Dibrova
(Lugansk People's Republic), and
Grigorovka (Donetsk People's
Republic).
Three counter-attacks launched by the enemy's
assault detachments were repelled.
The AFU losses amounted to more than 350 troops,
two motor vehicles, one UK-made 105-mm L119
gun, one U.S.-made 155-mm M198 howitzer, and
one U.S.-made 105-mm M119 gun. One Anklav-
N electronic warfare station was destroyed.
As a result of successful operations, units of the
Yug Group of Forces liberated Zoryanoye
(Donetsk People's Republic).
Losses were inflicted on manpower and hardware
of the 54th Mechanised Brigade, 59th Motorised
Infantry Brigade, 3rd, 10th mountain assault
brigades of the AFU, and 119th Territorial
Defence Brigade near Konstantinovka,
Kurakhovo, Nikiforovka, & Zvanovka
(Donetsk People's Republic).
Two counter-attacks launched by the enemy's assault
detachments were repelled. One field ammunition
depot was destroyed.
The AFU losses amounted to up to 830 troops, two
motor vehicles, and two Anklav-N electronic
warfare stations.
Units of the Tsentr Group of Forces ---- continued
advancing to the depth of the enemy's defences.
Losses were inflicted on manpower & hardware
of ..the 42nd, 93rd, 100th mechanised brigades,
the 59th Motorised Infantry Brigade, the 142nd
Infantry Brigade of the AFU, as well as the 1st
National Guard Brigade near Sukhaya Balka, Krasnoarmeysk, Vozdvizhenka, Dzerzhinsk,
Dimitrov, and Udachnoye (Donetsk
People's Republic).
Five counter-attacks launched by the AFU
assault detachments... were repelled.
The AFU losses amounted to up to 460 troops, two
motor vehicles, one 122-mm Grad MLRS launcher,
two 122-mm D-30 howitzers, and one 100-mm
Rapira gun. One ammunition depot
was wiped out.
Units of the Vostok Group of Forces -------- improved the
tactical situation. Losses were inflicted on formations
of the 72nd Mechanised Brigade of the AFU and 127th
Territorial Defence Brigade near Dobrovolye and
Shakhtyorskoye (Donetsk People's Republic).
The AFU losses... amounted to up to 115 troops, two
motor vehicles, one U.S.-made 155-mm Paladin self-
propelled artillery system, one French-made
155-mm CAESAR self-propelled artillery
system, and one 155-mm Bogdana
self-propelled artillery system.
Units of the Dnepr Groups of Forces inflicted losses on
and Kruglyakovka," military expert Andrey Marochko
told RIA Novosti. According to him, in some of them,
Russian units managed to gain a foothold on
the outskirts.
State Duma deputy Viktor Vodolatsky said last night
that the Russian military had only 6 kilometres left
to Kupyansk in the Kharkiv region. And according
to the head of the administration of the liberated
part of the region Vitaly Ganchev, the Ukrainian
authorities has begun to evacuate officials,
security forces and local residents
from Kupyansk.
___________________________________________
Zakharova -responded to Merz's
statement about an ultimatum
to Russia
October 16th, 10pm
(Izvestia.ru)
If Germany wants a cessation of hostilities in Ukraine, then
let it stop supplying weapons to the Kiev regime. This, was
stated on October 16th by the official representative of the
Russian Foreign Ministry, Maria Zakharova, commenting
on the words of the candidate for the post of German
Chancellor, Friedrich Merz, about an ultimatum
to Russia.
"If they want a cessation of hostilities, let them stop
supplying weapons to the terrorist Kiev regime.
And let him announce an ultimatum to his
wife," Zakharova commented.
Earlier in the day, Merz said that if he wins the German
chancellorship elections, he will present Russia with
an ultimatum, on the very first day, "in the case of non-compliance, he intends to lift the restriction on the range of weapons for Ukraine and transfer Taurus missiles to Kiev."
Germany - in principle - does not limit Ukraine on strikes
deep into Russian territory, the country's embassy said.
Earlier, on September 22, former German Chancellor Gerhard
Schroeder (who served in 1998-2005) advised anyone who
believes a military victory over Russia is possible, to
"look in the history books."
He noted --- that Germans should behave cautiously and
constructively -- against the background of the Second
World War, & crimes committed on behalf of Germany.
He noted that from Napoleon to Hitler, everyone failed.
On September the 14th, the current German Chancellor Olaf
Scholz stressed that Germany will not provide Ukraine with
the opportunity to strike at Russian territory with Taurus
missiles, even if this decision differs from the position
of partners. According to the German leader, this
can lead to serious consequences, so he will insist on his position.
On September 12, Russian President Vladimir Putin said that
a possible agreement between the US and EU... on Western
weapons strikes on the territory of the Russian Federation
would indicate their direct participation in the Ukrainian conflict ------ and radically change its essence.
In addition, the head of state said that there is an attempt to
substitute concepts. When it comes to using Western-made
high-precision long-range weapons, it should be
remembered --- that the Ukrainian army is not
capable of striking with them, Putin said.
________________________________________
Motorized riflemen under the leadership of
Junior Lieutenant Solovyov captured
the AFU stronghold
October 16th, 10pm
(Izvestia.ru)
A motorized rifle platoon..... under the command of Junior
Lieutenant Yevhen Solovyov stormed a stronghold of the
Armed Forces of Ukraine (AFU) in the area of one of the
settlements in the special operation zone.
Motorized skirmishers.... being under heavy artillery fire and
attacks by FPV drones, reached the positions of the Armed
Forces of Ukraine, including due to the fact that Solovyov
correctly calculated the location of observation posts,
which is why the platoon attacked the stronghold,
while simultaneously identifying additional
reserves advancing in the direction of the
Ukrainian military, after which... the
servicemen of the Armed Forces
of the Russian Federation
joined the battle.
During the assault, the second lieutenant was wounded,
but still continued to lead his subordinates. Under the
onslaught of Russian motorized infantry, fearing
being cut off from the main forces, the
Ukrainian military was forced
to retreat.
Thanks to... the courage, boldness and professionalism of
Belousov congratulatedthe Russian military who liberated Mikhaylovka in the DPR
October 15th, 10:58pm
(RT.ru)
Russian Defense Minister Andrey Belousov sent
a message of congratulations to the Russian
servicemen who liberated the village of
Mikhaylovka in the DPR.
According to the Defense Ministry, Belousov sent
a congratulatory telegram to the command and
personnel of the 15th separate Guards
motorized rifle Brigade..... of the
Alexandrian Order of Suvorov.
The head of the department stressed that today
the military, multiplying the glorious military
traditions of veterans --- are confidently
advancing in the Red Army direction.
"As a result of your professional and decisive actions,
the enemy suffers significant losses and inevitably
retreats," Belousov said.
In addition, it is reported that, for the courage and perseverance shown in performing combat tasks,
6 soldiers of the brigade were awarded the title
Hero of the Russian Federation ---- and over
1.6 thousand soldiers were awarded
state awards.
The Russian military, also liberated
Levadnoye in the Zaporizhia region.
_________________________________________
"Half of the occupied territory has
already been liberated." What is
happening in the Kursk region
by Alexey Permyakov
October 15th, 10:04pm
(Gazeta.ru)
The Russian military has recaptured at least three villages
in the Kursk region that were captured by the Ukrainian
Armed Forces in the summer, The New York
Times writes.
The situation in the region is... not very good, agree the
authors of the Ukrainian public Deep State. President
of Ukraine Volodymyr Zelensky claims that the units
of the Armed Forces of Ukraine.... successfully
counterattacked. And the commander of the
special forces "Akhmat" --- Major General
Apti Alaudinov said that about half of
the territory occupied by the UAF
Forces in the Kursk region has
already been liberated.
The Russian Armed Forces recaptured several villages in the
Kursk region that were captured by Ukrainian units in the
summer, which threatens Kiev's control over the territory,
which it sees as a crucial lever for pushing Russia to
negotiate. This is reported by The New York Times.
In recent days, Russian forces have stepped up efforts to
push Ukrainian forces out of a salient of territory they
captured in Russia's Kursk region, by launching
several armoured vehicle attacks.
''Maps of the battlefield compiled by independent groups
using satellite images and combat surveys - show that
Russian forces drove a wedge into the western edge
of the Ukrainian salient, recapturing at least
three villages," the publication of the US
newspaper says.
"In general, the situation in Kursk -- is not very good",
said the author of the Ukrainian public Deep State.
According to him, the Ukrainian military is
"taking measures to stabilize the
situation, but it is extremely
difficult to regain what
has been lost."
Russian units managed to move "quite far" into the Ukrainian
rear, Emil Kastehelmi, a military analyst at the Finnish
company Black Bird Group, told The New York Times.
However, Ukraine still holds about 300 square miles
of Russian territory, writes The New York Times.
"For the fifth day... the Russians continue trying to break
through our defenses in the Kursk region. The guys are
holding on and counterattacking," former President of
Ukraine, Volodymyr Zelensky, described the situation.
"And that's it, they'll kick us out of there"
The operation of the Ukrainian Armed Forces in the Kursk
region completely failed, said retired colonel of the
Ukrainian Security Service, Oleg Starikov,
on the YouTube channel "PolitExpert".
"I told you that in the end we will occupy a small bridgehead
in the area of Suji, and that's it, and we will be knocked out
from there," he said.
According to Starikov, the attack of the Ukrainian army on
the border region of the Russian Federation... did not give
Kiev any military, political and psychological advantage.
Ukraine has "screwed up" everything, he said.
The Armed Forces of Ukraine should withdraw from the
Kursk region, says Alexey Arestovich, a former
adviser to the office of the former President of
Ukraine Volodymyr Zelensky (listed in the
Russian Federation as a terrorist and
extremist). He stated this in an
interview with the Ukrainian
journalist Vasily Golovanov.
Commenting on reports that nine Ukrainian UAV operators were killed in the region, Arestovich said that there is probably "a complete mess" there.
"Drone operators are - usually - at a depth of 3-5 kilometres from the front line. If they were surrounded - as it is written - the soldiers thought they were on their own territory. This means a complete loss of control," said Arestovich.
300 lost, one surrendered
During the day, the losses of the Armed Forces of Ukraine, in
the Kursk region amounted to more than 300 people (and for
all the time of the fighting — 22,950), the Defense Ministry
said, in its summary of the situation in the region.
About half of the territory of the Kursk region occupied
by the Armed Forces of Ukraine since the beginning
of August has been liberated, said Major General
Apti Alaudinov, Deputy head of the Main Military
-Political Directorate of the Armed Forces of
the Russian Federation, commander of the
special forces "Akhmat".
_____________________________________________
Private Dykin helped evacuate
wounded colleagues
October 15th, 10:02pm
(Izvestia.ru
Private Yevgeny Dykin, as part of an assault platoon
-- performed the task of capturing a stronghold of
Ukrainian militants in an important tactical area.
During the fighting, some Russian attack aircraft
were injured, and Dykin helped to evacuate
wounded colleagues.
The Armed Forces of Ukraine (AFU) used attack drones
and mortars against Russian attack aircraft, as a result
of which, several servicemen were injured in various
degrees of severity and needed to be evacuated.
Private Dykin was given the task of covering the evacuation
group sent to the victims. During the inspection of the
surrounding area, Dykin came across a group of
Ukrainian soldiers moving in the direction of
the location of the Armed Forces of the
Russian Federation.
Dykin instantly got his bearings, took up a firing position and
attacked the enemy. Most of the personnel of the AFU group
was destroyed by targeted fire, the rest were forced to flee.
The Russian evacuation team, thanks to the quick and
courageous actions of a private, was able to
successfully move the wounded to a
safe place for further treatment.
The Ministry of Defense ---- also noted the courage and
dedication of Ivan Tsybuli, Deputy Chief of Staff of
the BARS-16 detachment, who together with his
detachment performed the task of maintaining
the defense in one of the dangerous sections
of the contact line.
The enemy, trying to break through the defense line,
attempted an offensive in the area of responsibility
of the detachment. Having discovered the enemy -
Ivan immediately reported this to the commander,
after which he was the first to attack the
Ukrainian military.
The enemy repeatedly tried to break through the defense,
but a detachment of the Russian Armed Forces inflicted
significant damage to the enemy with small arms fire.
Then the Ukrainian side requested support
for barrel and rocket artillery.
However, these measures did not have any effect:
the detachment - which included Ivan Tsybulya -
continued to hold the defense. Eventually, the
enemy ran out of attacking potential and
was forced to retreat.
The task of the Russian Armed Forces detachment
to hold positions, was successfully completed.
Earlier on October 15th, the Defense Ministry told how Lance
Corporal Pavel Korkin distracted the attention of the Armed
Forces of Ukraine in an important tactical area, as a result
of which his colleagues were able to attack the enemy,
catching him off guard --- and forcing him to retreat.
___________________________________________
Eight people were injuredwhen an
APU drone attacked a bus in the
Belgorod region
October 15th, 6:08pm
(Izvestia.ru)
In the Belgorod region, eight people, including four minors,
were injured as a result of a Ukrainian drone attack on a
regular bus. This was announced on October 15 by the
governor of the region Vyacheslav Gladkov.
A bus with passengers was attacked by a Ukrainian
drone while turning into the village of Oktyabrsky.
Two injured men with shrapnel wounds were hospitalized
in the city hospital No. 2 of Belgorod. Two of the injured
women received first aid, after which... they were
released for outpatient treatment. Four injured
minors were hospitalized in the children's
regional clinical hospital.
"A 17-year-old boy has a mine-explosive injury and shrapnel
wounds to the leg, a 16-year-old girl has a blind shrapnel
wound to the lower leg, a 10-year — old boy has a
closed craniocerebral injury - and barotrauma,
an eight-year-old boy has a mine-explosive
injury and a blind shrapnel wound to the
lower leg," Gladkov said in his
Telegram channel..
As for the bus, after a drone strike by the Armed Forces
of Ukraine (AFU), its body was damaged and its
windows were broken.
Earlier on October the 15th, Gladkov reported that in the
Oktyabrsky district of the Belgorod region -- a man was
injured by an AFU drone strike on a residential building.
He received multiple shrapnel wounds to his torso, arms
and legs. The victim was sent for first aid to the district
hospital, and later he will be transported to the
regional clinical hospital.
On the same day, a truck driver was injured in another
attack on the region. Gladkov noted that the man with
multiple severe shrapnel wounds to both legs... was
transferred - by passing transport to the ambulance
team for further hospitalization, and he is receiving
all the necessary medical care.
Ukrainian militants are trying to strike at Russian territories
against the background of a special operation in the
Donbass, the beginning of which was announced
on February 24, 2022. The decision was made
due to the aggravation of the situation in the
region due to shelling by the
Ukrainian military.
____________________________
Ex-Ambassador of Ukraine announced
the US plan to resolve the conflict
without the victory of Kiev
October 15th, 5:13pm
(Izvestia.ru)
The US authorities have a plan to end the conflict in Ukraine,
which does not imply a victory for Kiev and includes
"territorial compromises". This was announced
on October 15, by former Ukrainian
Ambassador to Washington
Valery Chaly.
"Yes - this plan is not about the victory of Ukraine," the Ukrainian newspaper Country.na quotes him as saying.
According to the diplomat, the United States has thought
through its settlement plans consistently, point by point.
First, they do not want to allow a direct clash between
the West and Russia. Secondly, at the same time,
they intend to prevent Russia from winning
over Ukraine.
The third point suggests a compromise solution:- "so that
Ukraine is preserved, even if not in the territory, but as a
sovereign, independent country," she said.
Earlier on October 15th, an expert of the Polylogue CG,
political consultant, Ruslan Andreev, in an interview
with Izvestia, said that the West was tired of the
conflict in Ukraine and was trying to "gently"
force Kiev to negotiate.
He noted that such signals indicate a rational understanding
of the situation and the search for the best solution for
Ukraine itself. He also noted that Western politicians
are aware that the later Kiev enters into peace
talks, the weaker its position will be.
Before that - on October the 14th - Verkhovna Rada deputy
Alexander Dubinsky, who is in a pre-trial detention centre
in Ukraine on suspicion of treason, said that the conflict
in Ukraine --- must be completed, and if the current
government in the country is not able to do this --
it should be replaced. The MP stressed that his
country helps the United States at too high a
price, giving the lives of its people for this.
In turn, The Wall Street Journal noted on September 28 that
US President Joe Biden reneges on his promises regarding
Ukraine and has his own "victory strategy", which he
does not disclose.
__________________________________________
Rogov: a mercenary from the US
was eliminated in the SVO zone
October 15th, 4:10pm
(Vesti.ru)
A US mercenary --- was eliminated in the special operation
zone. This was announced by Vladimir Rogov, Chairman of
the Commission of the Public Chamber of the Russian
Federation on sovereignty, co-chairman of the
Coordination Council for the integration
of new regions.
The destroyed mercenary is a former Special Forces soldier.
He was eliminated by a Russian drone strike near the
village of Grekovka in the LPR.
Vladimir Rogov, in a conversation with RIA Novosti, drew
attention to the fact that this case is indicative and
instructive for anyone who decides to come to
the Russian land... with weapons.
Earlier it became known about the destruction by the
Russian military of the US infantry fighting vehicle
Stryker, in which there were US soldiers.
__________________________________
US...pushes Ukraine to allow
mobilization from age of 18
— Ukrainian official
October 15th, 2:14pm
(TASS)
Representatives of the Democratic and Republican parties -
demand that Ukraine lower the mobilization age to 18
years, from the current 25 years, said Sergey
Leshchenko, adviser to the chief of staff
of the Ukrainian president's office.
"As long as this information has surfaced, I can confirm:
American politicians from both parties are pressing President Zelensky ....on the question of why
Ukraine does not mobilize people between
the ages of 18 years --- and 25 years. The
partners, have this reasoning: When the
US fought in Vietnam, people were sent
there from the age of 19 years. So, the
Americans say this: Western weapons
alone are not enough. Mobilization
from the age of 18 years --- is
required," he said.
"So far, Zelensky has not given in,"
Leshchenko continued.
Ukraine announced a general mobilization in March 2022.
Initially, it applied to men aged 27 years to 60 years, but
in April 2024 the permitted mobilization age was
reduced to 25 years.
Yet, Ukraine continues to maintain that its military has a
critical shortage of men. In early October, the chairman
of the legislature’s committee for national security,
defense and intelligence, Roman Kostinko,
called for allowing the mobilization of
Ukrainians from the age of 18.
____________________________________
Russia to give military help to North Korea
if it comes under attack -- senior diplomat
October 15th, 12:43pm (TASS)
Russia will provide military assistance to North Korea if the
country comes under attack, as is stipulated by a treaty
between Moscow and Pyongyang, Russian Deputy
Foreign Minister Andrey Rudenko said.
"If an act of aggression is committed against the Democratic
People's Republic of Korea, all necessary measures will be
taken in accordance with our legislation, in accordance
with the DPRK's legislation," he said to a question
from TASS.
Rudenko said clauses to that effect, are contained in the
treaty on comprehensive strategic partnership between
Russia and North Korea that was submitted to the State
Duma for ratification the day before.
"The treaty says it all: article three, article four. The treaty is
signed, so it is public," he said. "It has Article 4, which deals
precisely with the issue of mutual assistance in the case of
aggression, that the sides, in case of aggression against
one of the sides --------- will provide each other with any
necessary assistance, including military assistance."
Russian President Vladimir Putin earlier submitted a treaty
on comprehensive strategic partnership between Russia
and North Korea to the State Duma for ratification. The
treaty was signed in Pyongyang on June 19th, 2024.
The treaty provides... that the sides on a permanent basis
maintain and develop, taking into account their national
legislation and their international obligations, relations
of comprehensive strategic partnership, based on the
principles of mutual respect for state sovereignty &
territorial integrity, non-interference in internal affairs, equality, and other principles of international law relating to friendly relations and cooperation
between countries.
The sides... seek to establish global strategic stability
and a fair multipolar international system, according
to a memo to the treaty.
The treaty states that, in the event of an imminent threat of
an act of armed aggression against one of the sides ---- the
sides shall, at the request of one of the sides, immediately
activate bilateral channels for consultations with a view
to coordinating their positions and agreeing on possible
practical measures to assist each other to help
eliminate the threat.
In the event.. that one of the sides comes under an armed
attack by any country or several countries and thus finds
itself in a state of war, the other side will immediately
provide military and other assistance by all means
at its disposal in accordance with Article 51 of
the UN Charter and in accordance with the
laws of the Russian Federation and
the DPRK.
____________________________________
Residents of Transbaikaliasaw off
the deceased SVO fighter with a
living corridor...... 40 kms long
October 15th, 11:31am
(Vesti.ru)
Residents of the Trans-Baikal Territory lined up in a living
corridor 40 kilometres long ------ to say goodbye to the
participant of the special operation Artem Dambaev,
who saved 150 colleagues at the cost of his life.
In March 2022, at the very beginning of the special
operation, the battalion in which Artem Dambayev
served was ambushed. At the cost of his life, he
covered the withdrawal of a tank column ---
saving 150 of his colleagues, the regional
television channel "Zabaikalie" reports.
The last thing he said was,
"I won't leave the boys."
The soldier's funeral was held in June of the same year. To
pay tribute to the soldier, Russians lined up in a live queue
almost 40 kilometres long, from Petrovsk-Zabaikalsky to
Zugmara. The car with the coffin of the serviceman
was accompanied by a column of 60 cars.
In his native village of Zugmar, Artyom was given a bas-relief
that reads: "Saving his friends, he did not save himself. He
died for the sake of life, to do otherwise.... he could not."
Nearby, residents of the village .....are building a park on
their own, which will bear the name of Artem Dambayev.
__________________________________
Alaudinov: "Akhmat" liquidated
German-speaking mercenaries
in the free zone
October 15th, 11:11am
(Vesti.ru)
The commander of the special forces "Akhmat" Apty
Alaudinov reported the destruction of mercenaries
of the Armed Forces of Ukraine (AFU) who spoke
German in the area of the special operation.
"There was one section directly opposite the special
forces unit "Akhmat", where foreigners appeared —
the Germans were there," he said, on the air of
"Solovyov Live".
Alaudinov stressed that two teams of "Akhmat"
fought with German-speaking mercenaries.
"I'll tell you honestly, there was such a squeal on the air,
and from there, in my opinion, few people left alive," the commander added.
According to Alaudinov, the Ukrainian Armed Forces suffered
heavy losses due to poor training. Earlier, he reported that
soldiers of the elite units of the Ukrainian army are
surrendering to the Russian Armed Forces.
____________________________________
Fighter of the Armed Forces of the Russian
Federation Fanat:APUin the Kursk region
surrender in droves into captivity
October 15th, 11:04am
(Vesti.ru)
The commander of the sniper group of the 155th separate
Guards brigade of the Order of Zhukov of the Marine
Corps of the Pacific Fleet with the call sign Fanat
spoke about the mass surrender of militants of
the Ukrainian army in an exclusive interview
on the air of" 60 Minutes "on the TV
channel "Russia 1".
"They surrender... in droves, in packs.
This is a fact," the serviceman said.
At the same time, as the Fan noted, the soldiers
of the Armed Forces of Ukraine, resemble
inexperienced people from the street.
"They look like a pack from the street, there are also
specialists, but they are no different. They speak
Ukrainian, sometimes they shout something in
Russian," he said.
The fan also stressed that our units in the Kursk region
are moving forward and do not allow the enemy to gain a foothold.
Earlier, the deputy commander of the assault company with
the call sign Topol --- said that the soldiers of the Armed
Forces of Ukraine "do not want to shoot, immediately
lay down their weapons," and the commanders of
the Ukrainian army shoot those who surrender
in the back.
____________________________
North Korea blows up roads
connecting it to the South
October 15th, 10:47am
(PressTV)
Footage released by the S. Korean defense ministry
shows North Korean soldiers blowing up sections
of the deeply symbolic roads connecting it to
the South.
North Korea's military last week vowed to permanently seal
its southern border after spending months laying mines and
building anti-tank barriers in the wake of leader Kim Jong-
un's declaring the South his country's "principal enemy."
(Source: AFP)
__________________________________________
Tula engineersdeliver 4,000
kamikaze drones with
computer vision to
Russian troops
October 15th, 8:24am
(TASS)
Tula engineers have delivered 4,000 Ovod (Gadfly)
innovative kamikaze drones with computer vision,
self-destruct & multi-layered protection systems
to Russian troops in the special military
operation area, the Russian People’s
Front told TASS on Tuesday.
"The drone features a special algorithm that helps capture
contrasting pixels and seeks to clash with them. The
principle is as follows: an operator... sees a target
through goggles, presses a button on the control
panel and the UAV flies to it autonomously. It is
unaffected by outside electronic interference
or radio visibility impairment. Therefore,
a combat mission is carried out more
efficiently," Ovod drone developer
Andrey Ivanov, from the Tula
Region, said.
The drone features a remote detonation function, a self-
destruct system and a payload-loading multi-layered
protection system, the People’s Front specified.
"The People’s Front helps engineers deliver devices to
fighters at the frontline and sent a batch of 4,000
Ovod drones to troops in September," it said.
The Kulibin Club of the People’s Front selects, tests and
supports, serial production of the best innovations by
Russian engineers. This initiative has helped deliver
thousands of hi-tech electronic warfare systems to
the frontline... to counter enemy drones.
Russian troops have also received quadcopters,
self-propelled robotic carts... and
other innovative equipment.
________________________________
UkraineFalling Into Agony
October 14th
(SouthFront)
Amid the ongoing Russian offensive along the entire front,
Kiev intensified the hunt for new soldiers on the streets;
but at this stage of the war, more cannon fodder is
unlikely to change the balance of power and
stop the Russian army.
Over the past week alone, the Russian army advanced
about 150 km2. The largest area of 90 km2 was
liberated in the Russian Kursk region.
In recent days, a new stage of Russian offensive in the Kursk
region began. Russian forces are advancing all around
Sudzha. On the northern flank, Ukrainians sent
reinforcements to counterattack in
Lyubimovka but to no avail.
A large group of Ukrainian fighters is still surrounded in a
cauldron there. The Russian army is already completing
the mop up operations in the settlements nearby.
On the southern outskirts of Sudzha, Russians advanced in
the area of Cherkasskaya Konopelka. Ukrainian groups
are hiding in the forest areas west of the village.
The Armed Forces of Ukraine... lost their offensive potential
and retreated from the Russian territory in the Glushkovsky district. According to preliminary reports, Ukrainians were
repelled from the border village of Novy Put.
In an attempt to distract Russian forces, Ukrainians
continue operations in other border areas. Russian
border guards defeated a Ukrainian group spotted
near Zhuravlevka in the Belgorod region.
Military observers predict a new Russian offensive in the
southern Zaporozhie direction. At the moment, Russian
forces take advantage of Ukrainian mistakes - and
launch local attacks. The front starts moving in
different areas. Most recently, Russian forces
took control of the village of Levadnoe.
Ukrainians cannot stop rapid Russian advances on the
Donbass frontlines. One Ukrainian stronghold is falling
after another in the Pokrovsk & Kurakhovo directions.
Russian flags are already waving around Selidovo.
The battle for Toretsk is coming to its turning point.
Russian fighters are grinding Ukrainian units in the
ruins. The Ukrainian garrison was left without
evacuation, their military supplies and
communications, were disrupted.
Retreating on the frontlines, Ukraine is falling into agony.
The fuse of Ukrainian patriotism, nurtured by flourishing
propaganda of nationalism, is drying up. Losses on the
battlefields have long crossed the critical line and
hunting for cannon fodder on the streets
has intensified.
After the eastern ‘more pro-Russian’ regions, were almost
depopulated, recruiters attacked ‘pure Ukrainians’ in the
west of the country, as well as large cities like the
capital Kiev, after there were no more men left
to capture in small villages.
In recent days, tens of thousands of recruiters went to the
streets, concerts, weddings, funerals etc, causing public
outrage in the country.
Kiev’s methods of mobilization also do not please the West,
which is paying for survival of the grinded army, while
Ukrainians are having fun in the clubs, demotivated
and unwilling to fight.
_______________________________________
US ServicemenDestroyed
In Russian Kursk Region
October 14th
(SouthFront)
The Russian military provided new evidence of servicemen
of NATO states taking part in military operations on the
Russian territory in the border Kursk region.
Russian forces destroyed a Striker armoured personnel
carrier with its crew of eight militants from the US in
the Glushkovsky district in the Kursk region. All the
crew members burned in the Russian forest.
According to the documents found in the vehicle, one
of them was identified as Brandon Sanchez, who
joined the US Army in 2013 - as a cook.
Russian military observers noted --- that there were
mercenaries from the US and other NATO member
states spotted in the battles on Russian territory,
but this is the first recorded case --- of regular
military personnel of the US Army destroyed
in the border Kursk region.
Russian experts supposed that this may be due to the fact
that the Kiev regime allowed foreigners to hold command
officer positions in the Armed Forces of Ukraine. The
decision was made, due to heavy losses suffered by
the Ukrainian military, the lack of qualified service -men and the unwillingness of Ukrainian men to
join the army.
Since it recently became clear that it was the Americans
who were one of the main conductors of the attack by
Ukrainian nationalists on the Kursk region, it was
expected that US servicemen also took part in
the attack, – Russian military sources
commented on the report.
It was recently revealed that in February 2024, the Atlantic
Council held a war game. The details were revealed in the
documents of Michael McFaul, the former US ambassador
to Russia.
It turned out that the game included 2 scenarios of the
further military development in Ukraine. They included
negotiations on Ukraine’s accession to NATO - and
Ukraine’s breakthrough into the territory of the
Russian Federation.
The invasion was supposed to provoke public outrage,
and give rise to a revolutionary movement in Russia -
but it ended in another failure of the Ukrainian and
NATO militaries. Washington definitely played a
wrong card.
______________________________________________
Junior Sergeant of the Russian Armed
Forces Karataev intercepted control
of a Ukrainian UAV
October 14th, 10pm
(Izvestia.ru)
Lance Corporal Pavel Korkin diverted the attention of the
Armed Forces of Ukraine (AFU) militants in an important
tactical area, as a result of which his colleagues were
able to attack the enemy, catching him off guard, and
forcing him to retreat.
The group commander set the task for Korkin to enter from
the flank of the previously explored position of the Armed
Forces of Ukraine. It was necessary to provide fire
support to the assault group.
Corkin moved into position, selected a concealed firing point,
and began surveillance. When an assault group of the Armed
Forces of the Russian Federation started moving towards the
positions of the Armed Forces of Ukraine, the lance corporal
noticed activity at the enemy observation post. Despite the
threat to his life, Korkin opened fire, turning the attention of
the Ukrainian military to himself.
The plan succeeded, and the APU pulled additional forces
from other positions to counter Korkin. At this time, the
assault group of the Russian Armed Forces attacked
the enemy from the least protected side, catching
the enemy off guard. The Ukrainian Armed
Forces were forced to retreat.
The courage and bravery of Lance Corporal
Pavel Korkin allowed the Russian storm-
troopers to seize the stronghold.
The Russian Defense Ministry also noted the experience and
high professionalism of Junior Sergeant Nikita Karataev,
who intercepted the control of an enemy drone --- while
covering the actions of Russian troops with electronic
warfare (EW).
The APU drone, loaded with drop ammunition, was safely
landed on the ground, where Karatayev defused the
explosive device, reprogrammed the drone and
handed it over for use by artillery fire spotters.
Thanks to the experience and skills of Junior Sergeant
Nikita Karataev, the enemy was unable to strike at the
Russian servicemen.
Earlier on October 14, the Russian Defense Ministry said
that Guard private Dmitry Gorbachev promptly restored
radio communications damaged as a result of the
shelling of the Armed Forces of Ukraine.
____________________________________________
Mother.... who hung out the flag of
the Russian Federation in Odessa
spoke about the solidarity of the
people with her act
October 14th, 8:35pm
(Izvestia.ru)
In Ukraine, many people are in solidarity with the act of
Elena Chesakova, who was arrested for trying to hang
the Russian flag in Odessa ...on the pedestal of the
demolished monument to Catherine II... they are
simply afraid and silent. The girl's mother
told RT about this on October 14.
"In Ukraine --- many people think like her,
they are just afraid and silent," she said.
The mother of the arrested woman also said.. that
she could not convince her to make concessions.
"I don't change my opinions. So, as I said,
I will say so," she conveyed the words
of her daughter.
It is reported that -- at the moment -- the girl is
with her son and daughter under house arrest.
Earlier, on October 7th, in Odessa on Catherine Square, a
woman tried to hang the flag of the Russian Federation
on the pedestal of the removed monument to the
Russian Empress Catherine II. It was reported
that some eyewitnesses were outraged by
these actions and prevented her, after
which the woman was detained.
Director of the Institute of New Society, Vasily Koltashov, on
October 14, in a conversation with Izvestia, commenting on
this situation, drew attention to the fact that the Kiev
regime has a fascist nature and the laws do not
protect citizens.
Formally and officially --- all Ukrainians have the right to
express their position, but in reality, tens of thousands
of people in this country have been thrown into prison
for their opinions. Because of this, many residents of
The Russian military destroyed a "very valuable cargo"
delivered by a Panamanian-flagged container ship from Europe for the Ukrainian armed forces with an Iskander missile system strike on the port of Odessa last week.
This is reported by Military Watch Magazine (MWM).
"The strike by the Russian Iskander-M ballistic missile
system was carried out on the Panamanian-flagged
container ship Shui Spirit, which was transporting
weapons from the Romanian port of Constanta
to the Ukrainian city of Odessa. As a result of
the strike, a very valuable cargo was
destroyed," the newspaper writes.
According to Military Watch Magazine, the strike also
destroyed two boats of the Ukrainian border service,
resulting in the death of seven Ukrainian soldiers.
On October 6, the Russian Defense Ministry reported that
the crew of the Iskander-M complex destroyed a ship
with ammunition from Europe in the port of Yuzhny.
The Russian Defense Ministry clarified that the strike
was carried out ....during the unloading of weapons.
Military personnel of the group of troops of the Armed Forces
of the Russian Federation "North" continued their offensive in the Kursk direction.
According to the Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation - during the day - the fighters of the association hit the formations of ten brigades of the Armed Forces of Ukraine.
At the same time, aircraft and artillery hit clusters of
personnel and equipment of 13 AFU brigades in the
areas of 19 border settlements of Kursk region.
Five enemy attacks were also repelled.
9:40pm
Ukrainian media reported explosions in Dnepropetrovsk,
Kryvyi Rih, Pavlograd, Sumy and Kharkiv. Earlier, an
air alert was issued throughout Ukraine.
9:10pm
Employees of the shopping centre together with the police
conducted a raid before the concert of the group "Okean
Elzy" in the Kiev Sports Palace, Ukrainian media write.
It is noted that the men mass checked documents,
some were detained, despite the crowd's protests.
It is also reported that the shopping centre
raided restaurants and night clubs in
Kharkiv and Khmelnitsky.
7:41pm
Four civilians, including two firefighters, were injured on
Friday in the territory of the DPR as a result of attacks
by the Ukrainian Armed Forces, said the head of the
region Denis Pushilin.
"In the Kalininsky district of Gorlovka, as a result of the use
of cluster artillery by the enemy, a guy born in 2008 and a
boiler room watchman received moderate injuries... a
woman born in 1980," Pushilin wrote.
''In the Nikitovsky district of Gorlovka, during the elimination
of a deadwood fire, an attack by a VFU drone occurred —
so two EMERCOM employees of Russia were injured."
____________________________________________
The Russian Defense Ministry reported
on the exploits of the military in the
special operation zone
October 11th, 10pm
(Izvestia.ru)
The Russian Ministry of Defense reports on the exploits
of servicemen of the Armed Forces of the Russian
Federation -- who risk their lives for the sake of
successfully performing combat tasks during
a special
military operation (SVO).
The Ministry noted the actions of the senior assault group,
Lance Corporal Alexander Chernyak, who was able to
destroy three Ukrainian militants while performing a
combat mission to capture the positions of the
Armed Forces of Ukraine (AFU).
Despite the heavy fire and artillery barrage, Lance Corporal
Chernyak's group outflanked the AFU stronghold and,
taking advantage of the surprise, broke into
their positions.
In close combat --- Lance Corporal Chernyak and his
colleagues also used small arms to destroy another
enemy firing point, clear the stronghold and take up
defensive positions to repel counterattacks.
His group was able to hold their positions until the main
forces arrived, despite incessant shelling and dropping
explosive devices from UAVs.
The Ministry of Defense ----- also reported on the feat of
Lieutenant Maxim Grachev. As part of the engineering
and reconnaissance patrol, he performed tasks to
identify engineering obstacles in front of the front
edge of the AFU defense.
Despite constant clashes with various types of explosive
barriers, Lieutenant Grachev's group performed daily
combat missions.
During the operation, Lieutenant Grachev and his colleagues
found and destroyed more than 20 mines of various classes,
including foreign production. his courage and dedication
allowed him to successfully complete tasks on time
and without losses.
____________________________________________
The machine gunner who held back
the onslaught of the Armed Forces
of Ukraine, for more than 13 hours
is awarded the Order of Courage
October 11th, 9:44pm
(Lenta.ru)
A volunteer from Siberia spent more than 13 hours
fighting off attacks by the Ukrainian Armed
Forces in the Kherson region.
The volunteer in the special operation zone in Ukraine ---
Alexey Dmitriev, after the death of the unit commander,
repelled the attacks of the Ukrainian Armed Forces in
the Kherson region for more than 13 hours. For this,
the machine gunner from Irkutsk Bratsk was
awarded the Order of Courage, writes RT.
As noted, the battle took place back in April 2022 at the
turn of the Alexandrovka-Kirovo defense line. As Alexey
himself said, his unit occupied five Ukrainian oporniki.
Later, during one of the battles, the commander and
several colleagues were killed. Then... Dmitriev
decided to take command of the detachment
on himself.
"The fight was the heaviest of all time. Fear mixed with
anger when the commander died in front of my eyes,
then other guys. I had to take command myself,"
the volunteer emphasized.
A few days later, Dmitriev came under fire. He was traveling
with his colleagues in a UAZ truck during the delivery of
medicines. The driver and a field surgeon were killed.
Alexey and his assistant managed to get out on
bullet-riddled wheels.
In addition, in one of the battles, Alexey received two
wounds in the leg. But, despite the received disability
- Dmitriev wants to return to the SVO and become an
instructor in training machine gunners and
drone operators.
In September, it became known that an officer from Yakutia
held back the onslaught of units of the Armed Forces of
Ukraine in the special operation zone for ten hours.
Dmitry Kutsenko was awarded the title Hero of
Russia for the fight. He became the ninth
resident of the republic to receive this
award since the beginning of the SVO.
In August, in St. Petersburg, polling station No. 1592 was
named for the first time in honour of Grigory Chubko, a
soldier of the special military operation in Ukraine.
____________________________________________
A fighter of the Ukrainian Armed Forces
from Odessawas captured near Kursk
and asked not to return him home
October 11th, 9:14pm
(RT.ru)
A Ukrainian soldier from Odessa, who was captured in the
Kursk region, asked not to exchange him or return him to
Ukraine. His remarks were captured on a video taken at
the site of the destruction of other Ukrainian militants
in the Russian region.
The captured Ukrainian was wounded in the leg and head.
His wounds were bandaged. Three of his other comrades
were killed, and two others were captured.
As the Telegram channel Mash wrote earlier, about 1.5
thousand Ukrainian soldiers were surrounded near
the village of Olgovka in the Kursk region.
__________________________________________
Ukraine facing severe
internal turbulence
— commander
October 11th, 1:38pm
(TASS)
Ukraine is on the verge of significant internal upheavals -
due to the depletion of mobilization resources needed to
continue military operations, the Deputy Chief of the
Russian Armed Forces’ Main Military-Political
Department, Akhmat Special Forces
Commander, Major General
Apty Alaudinov said.
"Ukraine is on the brink of significant internal changes.
The Ukrainian people can no longer provide their male
population for this meat grinder to satisfy Zelensky,"
Alaudinov said in an interview with
Komsomolskaya Pravda.
He is also convinced that the special military operation will
be completed - by the end of the year. The commander
attributed this forecast to the upcoming US elections,
developments in the Middle East and the condition of
Ukraine itself. "I am more than confident that we will
complete the special military operation this year,"
he stated.
_________________________________________
A fighter of the Russian Armed Forces
spoke about his decision to go to the
front.... after the death of a friend
in the SVO zone
October 11th, 12:18pm
(Izvestia.ru)
A soldier of the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation with
the call sign Viking decided to go to the front after his friend
was killed in a drone strike by the Armed Forces of Ukraine
(AFU). He told Izvestia about this on Friday, October 11.
Before the start of the special military operation (SVO), the
man was engaged in furniture production in the Krasnodar
Territory, and also trained children, being a candidate for
the master of sports in sambo and judo.
"I first dragged a humanitarian aid kit from my shop together
with a friend in the Luhansk direction. On one of the trips
to the Luhansk direction, when we were driving back, a
kamikaze drone caught up with a friend, he remained
on the Luhansk land," the military said.
The Viking noted that as soon as he learned about the
incident, he immediately packed up his things and
went to Donetsk to the nearest bus station
to look for a military enlistment office.
The man was taken to an armoured group, where he became
a BMP-2 driver-mechanic. The Viking added that almost all
the men in his family served in the military... and he was
instilled with a love for the Motherland from childhood.
Earlier, on October the 8th, servicemen of the Russian Armed
Forces who took part in the liberation of the settlements
of Zhelannoye Vtoroye, Zhelannoye Pervoye and
Verkhnekamenskoye in the Donetsk People's
Republic (DPR) told Izvestia about the
liberation of these territories. They
noted that the settlements were
surrounded and then liberated.
The special operation to protect the Donbass, which Russian
President Vladimir Putin announced on February 24th, 2022,
continues. The decision was made against the background
of the worsening situation in the region.
_________________________________________
More than 40 militants of the Ukrainian
Armed Forces surrendered to the
Russian army in a week
October 11th, 11:57am
(Vesti.ru)
The Russian Defense Ministry reported that 43 soldiers
of the Armed Forces of Ukraine (AFU) surrendered.
The ministry clarifies.... that the militants laid down their
weapons on the contact line between October 5 and 11.
Earlier, a Russian serviceman with the call sign Navigator
said that the AFU militants kill about 80% of their
colleagues who want to surrender.
The fugitives are tracked down by drones,
then the soldiers are opened fire on.
______________________________
Ministry of Defense: Russian Armed
Forces liberated Ostrovskoye
in the DPR
October 11th, 11:41am
(Vesti.ru)
The Russian military liberated the village of
Ostrovskoye in the DPR, the Defense
Ministry said.
The village in the Pokrovsky district was recaptured
from the nationalists by Yuzhnaya group of troops.
According to the 2001 census, it
had a population of 323 people.
As part of the offensive operation, our soldiers inflicted a
fire defeat on the territorial defense brigades and the
National Guard of the Armed Forces of Ukraine.
During the week, the enemy lost up
to 4,790 militants in the direction.
Earlier, the group released the
Coveted Second in the DPR.
________________________________
Mash: about 1,500 soldiers of the
Ukrainian Armed Forces --- were
surrounded in the Kursk region
October 11th, 11:33am
(Vesti.ru)
As a result of the Russian counteroffensive, one and a half
thousand militants of the Kiev regime were surrounded
near the village of Olgovka in the Kursk region.
This is reported by the Telegram channel Mash.
According to the source, during the day, the
Russian Armed Forces knocked out the
enemy from four settlements.
It is reported that in a panic, Ukrainian operators
of FPV drones --- knock out their own equipment.
In addition, the soldiers of the Armed Forces of Ukraine,
having assessed the prospects, leave the village of
Leonidovo in small groups on armoured vehicles.
_________________________________
Drones of the Russian Armed Forces
record the shooting of their soldiers
by APU detachments
October 11th, 11:28
(Vesti.ru)
The Armed Forces of Ukraine (AFU) ---- deploy defensive
detachments behind their troops, which shoot soldiers
retreating from the front line. Such cases were
recorded by the Russian military,
using drones.
This was told to TASS by a serviceman of the Southern
Group of Troops of the Russian Armed Forces with the
call sign Navigator. "They open fire on them with
machine guns, or something heavier," he said.
According to the Navigator, for the same reason, Ukrainian
soldiers are afraid to surrender. "With each assault or
counteroffensive, up to a dozen soldiers of the
Armed Forces of Ukraine are killed,"
the military added.
Earlier, captive of the Armed Forces of Ukraine Yuriy
Marsyuk said that the ranks of the Ukrainian army
accept disabled people who have had their arms
or legs amputated. This is due to the
understaffing of units --- and an
acute shortage of manpower.
________________________________
The Russian military... evacuated the first
group of residents from liberated Ugledar
October 11th, 10:24am
(Vesti.ru)
The first group of civilians was evacuated from
Ugledar, which was liberated by Russian
servicemen on October 3. This is
reported by TASS.
Civilians were taken to a safe place. They received
medical assistance. "At present, they are
completely safe," the agency's
publication says.
__________________________________
Mobilized Ukrainians mysteriously dying
at recruitment centres — underground
October 11th, 10:03am
(TASS)
More and more unexplained deaths of forcibly mobilized
Ukrainians are occurring at military recruitment offices
- representatives of the Dozor underground told TASS.
"Ukrainian law pretty much gives free rein to temporary
recruitment centres to do anything they want, even in
controversial situations, revealing the country's true
politics - depravity. Currently, deaths at temporary
recruitment centres are common," the
representatives pointed out.
They noted that Ukrainians now see the centres'
employees "as something problematic
and malignant."
Due to widespread public anger, many conscientious
employees have left their jobs, only to be replaced
by "total scumbags" ...with criminal records.
"Meanwhile ---- most of them have never even
seen combat themselves," the underground
group emphasized.
It noted that the Kiev authorities find it easy
to control these employees, due to their
lack of education.
__________________________________________
Belousov instructed the Rubicon Centre
to assemble five more detachments
for the SVO zone
October 11th, 10:01am
(Vesti.ru)
Russian Defense Minister Andrey Belousov inspected
the new Rubicon Centre for Advanced Unmanned
Technologies and gave instructions to form
five more detachments for all groups of
the Russian Armed Forces in the
special operation zone... the
military department reports.
"Instructions were given to form and equip
five more detachments," the report says.
In addition, Belousov instructed to train specialists of
combat crews and support units as soon as possible.
In the special operation zone, Rubicon detachments
destroy enemy equipment and weapons, and UAV
crews work around the clock. Combat teams
include engineers, technicians,
communications specialists,
medics, analysts, and
intelligence officers.
The centre also develops and tests
advanced systems of robotic
complexes ...and trains
operators for them.
____________________________________
Russian forces push Ukrainian troops
beyond LPR administrative border
October 11th, 9:08am
(TASS)
Russian forces have pushed Ukrainian troops out of their
positions near the settlement of Myasozharovka and
advanced by 1.5 km - to reach the administrative
border of the Lugansk People’s Republic (LPR),
military expert Andrey Marochko told TASS
on Friday.
"Our troops have managed...... to push the enemy out of its
positions southwest of the settlement of Myasozharovka
in active combat operations. This has enabled Russian
forces to advance by 1.5 km and reach the LPR's
administrative border," he said.
With the advance near Myasozharovka, Russian troops have
also begun to deliver "more precise fire" at enemy units
stationed in the area of the community of Lozovaya,
he said.
Russia’s Defense Ministry reported on September 29 that
Battlegroup West units had liberated the settlement
of Makeyevka as a result of successful offensive
operations. As Marochko pointed out --- the
Ukrainian army controlled less than 1%
of LPR territory after Russian troops
liberated Makeyevka.
___________________________________________
Russian drones destroyed the AFU's
Starlink antennas on the right bank
of the Dnieper River
October 11th, 4:33am
(Vesti.ru)
Satellite communications antennas of the Kiev
regime's army became the prey of Russian
drones in the Kakhovka area of a
special military operation.
"During the flight over the right bank of the Dnieper River,
the UAV operator discovered masked Starlink antennas.
It was decided to destroy them with the help of
kamikaze drones," TASS reports, citing
information from the Russian
Defense Ministry.
It is noted that an accurate hit of drones on the target
and the defeat of satellite dishes, as well as
repeaters of the Kiev regime's army,
was recorded.
As explained, the calculation of the UAV consists of two
people. One of them prepares the drone for a combat
mission, the other monitors the target and
corrects the drone's flight.
_________________________________________
Alaudinov spoke aboutthe panic of the Armed Forces of Ukraine in the Kursk region
October 10th, 10:14pm
(Lenta.ru)
Soldiers of the Armed Forces ofUkraine (AFU) in the Kursk
direction panicked amid losses. This was stated by the
commander of the special forces "Akhmat", deputy
head of the main military-political department of
the Ministry of Defense of the Russian
Federation, Major General Apti
Alaudinov on the air of the
TV channel"Russia-1".
According to him, the military personnel are confused
because of the current situation. "Indeed, he is
panicking, and we are recording this",
said Alaudinov.
__________________________________________
The Ministry of Defense of the Russian
Federation reported on the exploits of
the military in the free defense zone
October 10th, 10pm
(Izvestia.ru)
The Ministry of Defense noted the feat of Senior Lieutenant
Valery Yurin. During the offensive operations, the group
- under his leadership - conducted engineering
reconnaissance of the route of movement
of assault groups at one of the sites in the SVO zone.
After advancing to the line of combat contact, the group led
by Yurin defused mine-explosive barriers installed by the
enemy secretly from the drones of the Armed Forces of
Ukraine (AFU).
Before the start of the movement of the Russian assault
groups, Ukrainian militants used several unmanned
aerial vehicles (UAVs) to re-mine directly on the
route of the groups' movement.
Then Valery Yurin waited until the end of the enemy
drones, warned the commander of the attack aircraft by means of communication and moved to the newly mined area.....
after which... he successfully
neutralized five mines, then
transmitted information on
the passage made, to the
assault group, allowing
them to continue their
offensive operations.
Thanks to the actions of the senior lieutenant, the
Russian soldiers reached the positions of the
Ukrainian Armed Forces without losses and
managed to occupy an important
enemy stronghold.
The Ministry of Defense also reported on the feat of the
Guard of Junior Lieutenant Roman Sedov. In the area
of one of the settlements, a column of armoured
vehicles was attacked by anti-tank guided
missiles, FPV drones and cluster
munitions fired by the Armed F
orces of Ukraine.
Sedov, realizing that the further advance of the column
would lead to even greater losses, ordered to hide
the equipment in the nearest forest belt.
Also, the guard junior lieutenant pulled two seriously
wounded soldiers to safety and gave them first aid,
and then organized the evacuation, despite his
own severe concussion and injury.
After the shelling by Ukrainian militants, the convoy
continued to move and arrived in the designated
area in a timely manner.
_________________________________________
Ukrainian media reported explosions
in the Odessa and Sumy regions
October 10th, 9:45pm
(Izvestia.ru)
Explosions occurred in Odessa and Belopolye,
in the Sumy region of Ukraine. This was
reported on October 10th --- in the
Ukrainian edition "Сountry.ua".
"Strong explosions in Odessa near the port are
reported by the local public. Explosions are
reported in Belopolye, Sumy region," the
publication said in its Telegram channel.
Odessa Mayor Gennady Trukhanov confirmed
the information about explosions in the city.
According to the online map of the Ukrainian Ministry
of Digital Transformation an air alert has been issued in the Sumy, Odessa and Mykolaiv regions.
The Russian Defense Ministry did not
comment on reports of explosions.
Earlier in the day, explosions were reported in
Kryvyi Rih, Dnipropetrovsk region. An air
alert was issued in the region.
In October 2022, Russian troops began attacking military
installations and related energy and communications
facilities in Ukraine. As Russian President Vladimir
Putin explained, this was a response to the
terrorist actions of the Kiev regime.
The special operation to protect the Donbass, which Russian
President Vladimir Putin announced on February 24, 2022,
continues. The decision was made against the
background of the worsening situation in
the region.
__________________________________________
Alaudinov spoke about the fate of Zelensky
after the collapse of the Armed Forces
of Ukraine
October 10th, 9:23pm
(Lenta.ru)
The Ukrainian front has fallen - in at least ten areas, Major
General Apti Alaudinov, commander of the Akhmat special
forces and deputy head of the main military and political
Directorate of the Russian Defense Ministry, said on the
Rossiya 1 TV channel.
In his opinion, after the collapse of the Armed Forces
of Ukraine (APU), President Vladimir Zelensky is
"unlikely to be left alive" by curators from
the West.
"Now he, [Zelensky], as far as I understand, is in agony.
We will soon see, probably, what will happen to him: it
is unlikely that they will want to keep him alive, since
he is a witness to a very large number of crimes
committed," Alaudinov said.
As the commander of the special forces "Akhmat" pointed out, even the "closest friends" of the
Ukrainian president are starting to openly
recognize the impossibility of Kiev
winning over Russia.
Earlier, Alaudinov said that a large group of Ukrainian
Armed Forces soldiers had escaped from the Kursk
region in vehicles. At the same time, according to
him, during the flight, Ukrainian servicemen lost
part of their tanks — they were destroyed by
Russian soldiers.
___________________________________________
Parents of Dadin, who fought for
the Armed Forces of Ukraine -
announced the zombification
of their son in Ukraine
October 10th, 7:15pm
(Izvestia.ru)
Ildus Dadin, the father of Ildar Dadin, a radical activist of the
LGBT movement (banned in the Russian Federation, the
organization's activities are recognized as extremist),
who fought for the Armed Forces of Ukraine (AFU),
called his son's decision to fight against Russia
a tragedy.
When asked how his parents reacted to his son's decision to
join the Armed Forces of Ukraine, the father expressed
regret that he "lived to see that day." According to
him, after Ildar defected to the Ukrainian
Armed Forces, his brothers stopped
communicating with him.
"This is the biggest tragedy. It is good that my
grandfather did not live to see this day,"
said his father.
According to Ildus, he tried to persuade his son
not to fight for Ukraine, but "a wall appeared
between them" and nothing happened.
The parents added that their son
constantly communicated with
the Ukrainian side and could
be zombified in this way.
Earlier in the day, it became known that Dadin was destroyed
in the SVO zone. The head of Vorkuta, a participant in the
special operation, Yaroslav Shaposhnikov --- said that
Russia has always stood on patriarchal foundations
and those people who betrayed their Homeland
always ended up badly.
Ildar Dadin became the first person convicted under the
article "Repeated violation of the rules for organizing
or holding rallies, demonstrations and picketing".
In December 2015, the activist was found guilty and
sentenced to three years in prison. Later, this
period was reduced to 2.5 years.
In February 2017, the Supreme Court of Russia overturned
the sentence of Ildar Dadin under Article 212.1 of the
Slovak Prime Minister Robert Fico on Monday, October 7,
criticized European politicians who support the idea of
allowing Ukraine to launch long-range missile strikes
on the territory of Russia.. and suggested attacking
the Belgian capital Brussels with such a projectile.
"We suddenly hear some members of the EU Parliament
talking about medium-range missiles and long-range
missiles with the ease of a spring breeze. Well,
figuratively speaking. Maybe..... such a single
rocket could break the fountain in Brussels,
so that they understand what everyone is
talking about," Fico said at a ceremony
marking the 80th anniversary of the
Carpathian-Duklin operation.
The head of the Slovak government shared that he was
sorry that there was a "perverse fashion" in Europe to
applaud and enthusiastically welcome decisions that
support armed conflicts..... instead of stopping
sabre rattling.
Fico recalled that during the Second World War, many
peoples — Russians, Ukrainians, Slovaks, Czechs and
others - fought shoulder to shoulder without
disagreement against a common enemy.
On the evening of October 6th, Fico ruled out Slovakia's
consent to Ukraine's accession to NATO. The Head of
Government reminded that the membership of any
state in the alliance must be ratified by all its
member countries.
Before that, on August 30th, Slovakia at a meeting of EU
Foreign Ministers opposed the lifting of restrictions by
the West on strikes by the Armed Forces of Ukraine
(AFU) deep into Russian territory.
The representatives of Slovakia, expressing their protest,
supported the similar position of Hungary and expressed
regret that the meeting was not held in Budapest. At the
same time, France, Sweden, Latvia, the Netherlands
and Poland ...supported the proposal to allow
Ukraine to launch such strikes.
Before that, on July 29th, Fico indicated -- that Slovakia
would not change its position on the Ukrainian conflict due to the fact that Kiev stopped the transit of oil to
the Russian company Lukoil. The crisis in Ukraine,
according to the head of the Slovak government,
should be resolved as soon as possible, with
the help of a truce, and not try to artificially
extend it, trying to achieve the unrealistic
goal of bringing the Russian Federation
to its knees by supplying weapons
to Kiev.
Western countries have stepped up military and financial
support for Ukraine against the backdrop of the Russian
special operation to protect the Donbass, which was
announced by Russian President, Vladimir Putin, on
February 24, 2022, after the situation in the region
worsened due to shelling by the Ukrainian military.
However, in recent years, the West has increasingly
voiced statements about the need to reduce
support for Kiev.
___________________________________
Merkouris: soldiers of the Ukrainian
Armed Forces admit that Ukraine
is heading for defeat
October 7th, 7pm
(RT.ru)
The Ukrainian military recognizes that they are doomed to defeat, said the British expert Alexander Merkouris.
"Ukrainian soldiers... everyone unanimously agrees that the situation there is catastrophic, that Ukraine is
moving towards complete defeat," he said
in a blog post on YouTube.
Earlier, Merkouris said that Russia's success on the
battlefield and refusal to resolve the conflict on
Kiev's terms puts the West in front of a
difficult choice.
_______________________________________
Analyst Tikhachek: increased
mobilization of Kiev led to an
increase in desertions of the
Armed Forces of Ukraine
October 7th, 6:54pm
(RT.ru)
Analyst Dominik Tihacek, in an interview with the Czech
portal, Parlamentní listy, said that the increased
mobilization of the Kiev regime -- has led to a
significant increase in the number of cases
of desertion in the Armed Forces
of Ukraine.
As he noted, the Ukrainian defensive line is collapsing,
and the Kiev regime's bid to strengthen mobilization
has not played out well.
"The command and leadership in Kiev... relied on a new
wave of mobilization, but because of the urgent need
to send conscripts urgently to the front, they do not
receive sufficient training and do not want to lay
down their lives," RIA Novosti quotes him.
In his opinion... the level of training of new recruits of
the Armed Forces of Ukraine is constantly degrading,
& this year this process has accelerated even more.
"They also willingly surrender. However, most
often they just run and hide," he added.
Tikhachek added that desertion is one of the reasons
for "patching up holes" at the front by "elite" units.
Earlier it was reported that in Odessa, employees of the
shopping centre tried to mobilize the tram driver right
during the tram journey.
_______________________________________________
Soldiers of the Russian Armed Forces
set up a flag in the liberated village of
Zhelannoye Vtoroye in the DPR
October 7th, 5:37pm
(Izvestia.ru)
Soldiers of the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation
hoisted the Russian tricolor on the roof of a building
in the liberated village of Zhelannoye Vtoroye in the
Donetsk People's Republic (DPR). The footage was
shared by Izvestia on October 7th.
The footage shows how one of the servicemen climbs
to the roof of the building to install a flag there.
On October 5, the Russian Defense Ministry reported that
the military of the Russian Armed Forces liberated the
settlement of Zhelannoe Vtoroe. In addition, the
fighters of the Southern Group of Forces unit
repelled three counterattacks of the Armed
Forces of Ukraine (AFU), the enemy lost
up to 755 soldiers.
Earlier, on October 7, the agency reported that a unit of
the Center group of troops liberated the settlement of
Grodovka in the DPR. The fighters also defeated the
personnel and equipment of the mechanized and
amphibious brigades of the Armed Forces of
Ukraine in the areas of Dzerzhinsk,
Aleksandro-Kalinovo, Sukhaya
Balka, Dmitrov, Lysovka,
Selidovo, Tsukurino and
Krasnoe in the DPR, as
well as in Raipol in the
Dnipropetrovsk region.
On October 3rd, the Ministry of Defense reported that
Russian servicemen liberated the village of Ugledar
in the DPR. Russian troops broke through
simultaneously from two flanks - near
the settlements of Vodiane and
Prechistovka. During the
operation, 44 Ukrainian
soldiers surrendered.
The special operation to protect the Donbass, which
Russian President Vladimir Putin announced on
February 24, 2022, continues. The decision
was made against the background of the
worsening situation in the region.
________________________________________________
Complex "Iskander": The Russian Defense Ministry
announced the defeat of the point of temporary
deployment of the 72nd brigade of the Armed
Forces of Ukraine
by Roman Shimaev
October 7th, 2:25pm
(RT.ru)
The Russian military at night struck using an
operational-tactical complex "Iskander" on
the territory of an industrial enterprise in
Pavlograd (Dnipropetrovsk region).
As noted by the Ministry of Defense of the Russian
Federation --- there was a temporary deployment
point of the 72nd separate mechanized brigade
of the Armed Forces of Ukraine.
2:35pm
The Russian Armed Forces launched a missile attack on
the ammunition depot of the 80th separate assault
Brigade of the Armed Forces of Ukraine in the
area of Osoyevka (Sumy region).
2:24pm
The Crimean Bridge remains a priority target for attacks
by the Armed Forces of Ukraine with the help of British
Storm Shadow missiles, head of the Russian Foreign
Intelligence Service Sergey Naryshkin said at the
55th meeting of the Council of Heads of Security
Agencies and Special Services of the CIS
member states.
2:05pm
The head of the Novotroitskoye department of the Main
Directorate of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia
in the Kherson region received a mine-explosive injury
as a result of the detonation of an explosive device
that was placed under the bottom of his car in the
urban-type settlement of Novotroitskoye.
"The victim was taken to a medical facility with injuries
of varying severity. He is receiving the necessary
assistance, " the regional Investigative
Committee said.
A criminal case has been opened
on attempted murder.
2:03pm
The head of the Liberal Democratic Party Leonid Slutsky
commented on RT data from the Russian Defense
Ministry - about the upcoming provocation of
Kiev with the use of chemical weapons.
"Ukraine is a terrorist state, the United States is a state
sponsor of terrorism. In all spheres, up to the nuclear
one," he said.
1:41pm
The Russian Armed Forces attacked with an Iskander tactical missile, the temporary location of the 72nd separate mechanized brigade of the Armed Forces of Ukraine.
1:34pm
A US M777 howitzer along with ammunition
was destroyed in the Sumy region by the
Pacer attack UAV crew.
1:11pm
At about 12: 20 Moscow time, air defense systems
destroyed two Ukrainian unmanned aerial
vehicles over the territory of the
Belgorod region.
12:57pm
The plan of a terrorist attack on the Kursk region
included the seizure and mining of the Kursk
nuclear power plant, said the head of the
SVR, Sergey Naryshkin.
12:50pm
US intelligence has been transmitting information to
the Kiev regime for strikes on Russian civilian
infrastructure since the beginning of its
operation, said Sergey Naryshkin,
head of the Russian Foreign
Intelligence Service.
According to him, Washington, together with NATO,
actively condones the criminal line of Kiev and
bears no less responsibility for the death of
the population and the destruction of
Russian infrastructure.
12:42pm
The losses of the Armed Forces of Ukraine during the fighting in the Kursk direction exceeded 21 thousand servicemen, the Russian Defense Ministry said.
14:34
The Russian Armed Forces advanced in the Stepnogorsk
direction in Kamenskoye village and took positions
across the Yanchekrak River, Chairman of the
Commission on Sovereignty, patriotic
projects and support for veterans
...of the Public Chamber of the
Russian Federation, Vladimir
Rogov said in a conversation
with TASS.
_______________________________
President of Republika Srpska
calls Putin"a man of peace"
October 7th, 12:53pm
(Izvestia.ru)
Russian President Vladimir Putin is a "man of peace" and
is forced to defend his country from the expansion of the
West. This was stated by the President of the Republika
Srpska, which is part of Bosnia and Herzegovina,
Milorad Dodik.
"Despite all the hysteria that starts in the West at the
mention of Putin's name, I still consider him a man of
peace. Putin is forced to defend Russia from the
expansion of Western countries - especially in
Ukraine, because of its proximity to Moscow,"
he said in an interview with Roger Keppel,
editor-in-chief of the Swiss newspaper
Die Weltwoche on October 5.
The politician expressed the opinion that at the moment
the Ukrainian conflict is increasingly turning into a
conflict between Russia and the West, in which
Ukraine will become a "collateral loss"
for Western capitals.
The United States deliberately draws European countries
into this situation so that they cannot maintain
partnership relations with the Russian
Federation, Dodik added.
He condemned what is happening and noted that in this
way Europe has lost an important energy partner and
retained only a shadow of its former power.
According to the politician, Putin sees all attempts by the
West to draw Russia into a conflict with NATO countries,
in the event of which Russia will win an obvious victory.
At the same time, he called the discussion of supplying
Kiev with Western long-range missiles for strikes deep
into Russian territory - a deliberate escalation.
The President of Republika Srpska noted that it would be
more profitable for Germany and the EU as a whole to develop a strategic partnership with Moscow.
At the same time, experience shows that European
countries, rather, need subordinate peoples and
elites, Dodik concluded.
Earlier, on September 30th, Putin recalled that Russia
was trying to resolve the conflict in Ukraine, in a
peaceful way. These attempts ended in forgery
and deception on the part of Western elites,
who turned Ukrainian territory into a
military base, planted radical
nationalism in this country
and armed it.
Further events have shown that a special military
operation is necessary, justified - and has a truly
liberating character, the head of state stressed.
Western countries have stepped up military and financial
support for Kiev... against the backdrop of the Russian
special operation to protect the Donbass.. which was
announced on February 24, 2022, after the situation
in the region worsene,d due to shelling by the
Ukrainian military. However, in recent years,
the West has - increasingly - voiced
statements... about the need to
reduce support for Ukraine.
________________________________________
Lavrov: Russia will continue its military
operation until the threats posed by
Ukraine are eliminated
October 7th, 11:23am
(RT.ru)
The special military operation will continue - until the
threats from Ukraine are eliminated. This was stated
by Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov.
According to him, in an interview with the US magazine
Newsweek, Russian President Vladimir Putin on June
14 called a number of prerequisites for a settlement
in Ukraine, but Kiev "reacted to this statement with
an armed invasion of the Kursk region on August 6."
Lavrov noted that Ukraine's patrons in the face of the
United States and other NATO member countries
want to inflict a "strategic defeat"on Russia.
"In these circumstances, we have no choice but to
continue the special military operation - until the
threats emanating from Ukraine are eliminated,"
the minister said on the website of the
foreign Ministry.
Earlier, Lavrov explained to the Foreign Ministers of
Abkhazia and South Ossetia, Sergey Shamba and
Akhsar Dzhioev, Putin's initiatives on Ukraine.
_______________________________________________
Russian Defence Ministry reports
on the progress of the special
military operation
October 7th, 10:30pm
The Armed Forces of the Russian Federation
continue the special military operation.
The Sever Group of Forces in Liptsy and Volchansk
directions, engaged the units of the 57th Motorised
Infantry Brigade, 71st Jaeger Brigade and 92nd Air
Assault Brigade of the Armed Forces of Ukraine,
the 113th Territorial Defence Brigade in Malye
Prokhody, Liptsy, Verkhnyaya Pisarevka,
Volchansk, and Khripuny
(Kharkov region).
The AFU lost up to 95 troops, two armoured fighting
vehicles, two pickup trucks, and one 152-mm
Akatsiya self-propelled artillery system.
The Zapad Group's units have taken more advantageous
lines and positions. Russian troops hit personnel and
materiel of the 30th, 44th, 63rd, 66th mechanised
brigades, 3rd Assault Brigade of the Armed
forces of Ukraine, 114th Territorial Defence
Brigade, and 1st National Guard Brigade
close to Kupyansk, Petropavlovka,
Novoosinovo, Kruglyakovka...
Lozovaya & Druzhelyubovka
(Kharkov region) & Torskoye
(Donetsk People's Republic).
Four counter-attacks launched by assault detachments
of the 14th and 116th mechanised brigades of the AFU
were repelled.
The enemy losses amounted to more than 410 troops,
two infantry fighting vehicles, six motor vehicles, one
155-mm Braveheart self-propelled artillery system, a
UK-made 105-mm L-119 gun, two 122-mm D-30
howitzers; and one M113 armoured personnel
carrier, one MaxxPro armoured fighting
vehicle, and one 155-mm M198
howitzer made by the USA.
One Anklav-N electronic warfare station and two
field ammunition depots were destroyed.
The Yug Group of Forces ----- continued advancing to the
depth of enemy defences. The Group engaged the units
of the 22nd, 30th, 54th, 93rd mechanised brigades, 56th
Similarly to the ABM Treaty, the US unilaterally pulled
out of the INF Treaty in 2019. However, instead of
simply stating it wished to develop weapons
beyond the treaty’s limitations, the Trump
administration accused Moscow of
violating the treaty by lying about
the range of its 9M728/9M729
missiles used by Iskander
missile systems.
Nonetheless, within 2 weeks of the US’ formal
departure from the treaty, in August 2019, it
began testing the first of multiple missiles
that violated the treaty’s limitations.
The origins of the INF Treaty lay in a dramatic
showdown, across Europe, in late 1983,
triggered by Washington’s deployment
of ITS Pershing-II intermediate-range
ballistic missiles (IRBM) to Europe.
With a 900-mile range, a flight apogee of just 60 miles,
and a maneuverable, radar-guided reentry vehicle,
the missile could put an 80-kiloton nuclear war-
head on Moscow in between 6 and 11 minutes
...according to Pentagon leaders. Such a fast
strike time gave the Soviets just minutes to
identify, analyze and respond to the threat,
greatly increasing the risk of them mis-
reading a situation and launching a
mistaken nuclear return volley,
believing it to be their
only chance.
In addition, tensions in Europe had already been
ramped up by years of psychological operations
designed to increase Soviet anxieties, such as
US bombers charging Soviet borders and
turning away at the last second
That’s why, when NATO began the vast, ultra-realistic
“Able Archer-83” war games, simulating an all-out
attack on the Soviet Union, in November 1983, it put Soviet fears through the roof.
However, it wasn’t until after the war games had
concluded, several days later, that NATO
commanders discovered key signs: the
Soviets had loaded hundreds of strike
aircraft in East Germany and Poland
with nuclear bombs, and orders to
strike “front-line targets” at a
moment’s notice.
The INF Treaty eliminated missiles like the Pershing-II,
banning land-based missiles with ranges of between
500 klms and 5,500 klms. This significantly cooled
tensions in Europe... although the treaty was only
between the US and Soviet Union -- now Russia --
which left other countries, such as China, free to
develop their own intermediate-range missiles.
The INF’s absence now is especially poignant,
considering the long-standing Russian fears
over a NATO Aegis Ashore missile system,
built on a land base in Deveselu, Romania.
While the US claimed the system was purely
defensive, Moscow noted... that Aegis can
also be used to launch offensive missiles.
Among the missiles tested after the INF Treaty lapsed
was a land-based Tomahawk missile with a range of
1,600 kilometres - a cruise missile US Aegis
cruisers have fired at sea for years.
1992 Treaty on Open Skies
The Open Skies treaty... was an attempt to increase
transparency and put to rest fears of an impending
attack by the other side. The deal allowed 35
partner nations to perform reconnaissance
overflights over other nations... using
specialized aircraft with specialized
equipment. However, flights could
not interfere with other military
activities and could be refused
by the overflown nation, for a
variety of reasons.
The US sent signs it was interested in leaving the
treaty as early as 2019, claiming it was caused
by Russia refusing US Open Skies aircraft
access to several areas almost a decade
earlier - denials Moscow insisted were
within its rights under the treaty.
The US finally made the move on May 21ST 2020,
meaning the six-month cooldown time had the
US leaving the treaty, after the November 2020 elections, that Trump lost.
The decision sparked an outcry across Europe, with Ukraine being one of the loudest critics;
that nation having long used Open Skies to perform overflights in western Russia, to calm its nerves about troops and
installations there.
Indeed, the Open Skies Treaty was drafted precisely to
avoid the type of anxious confrontation... unfolding on
the Russia-Ukraine border, over the last two months.
The Democrats publicly attacked Trump’s withdrawal
as illegal then... although much of their criticism
focused on his refusal to notify Congress before
pulling out. However, in March 2021, a leaked
message --- sent to concerned “international
partners” by the Biden administration said
it was afraid that doing so “would send
the wrong message to Russia and
undermine our position... on the
broader arms control agenda.”
Istanbul, Astana Declarations
The Organization for Security and Cooperation in
Europe (OSCE) has its origins in the November
1972 multilateral talks in Espoo, Finland
...intended to further the peaceful
cooperation of the Detente era.
Today, the OSCE has 57 members and 11 observers
and continues to serve as a regional forum for
resolving international issues.
Two of its most important declarations of principles
came at summits in Istanbul, Turkey, in 1999 and in
Astana (now Nur-Sultan), Kazakhstan, in 2010,
which, among other topics, affirmed each
nation’s right to its own security in the
context of an international community.
"The security of each participating State... is
inseparably linked to that of all others. Each
participating State, has an equal right to
security. We reaffirm the inherent right
of each and every participating State
...to be free to choose or change its
security arrangements, including
treaties of alliance, as they evolve.''
''Each State also has the right to neutrality. Each
participating State will respect the rights of all others in these regards. They will not
strengthen their security ...at the
expense of... the security of
other States.'' the Astana
declaration states.
While the OSCE met in Vienna, Austria, 2 weeks ago,
the talks yielded no major breakthrough. Earlier this
week -- when the US and NATO delivered separate
written responses to Russia’s December security
proposal -- the US response was considerably
more intransigent, while NATO’s, sent from
Brussels and speaking for 30 member
states, acknowledged the Russian
security concerns and proposed
mutual briefings in the NATO-
Russia Council and the re-
establishment of their
respective envoys in
Moscow & Brussels.
However, neither reply gave deference to Russia’s
central concern --- the eastward expansion of
NATO and the impact that has on Russian
security, especially since now, the US
explicitly regards Russia as a
challenger to its position ...as leader of the post- Cold War global order.
Speaking on Thursday, about the US response,
in particular, Russia's Foreign Minister, Sergey
Lavrov said "The principle that one should not strengthen one's security -- at the expense of
the security of others is deliberately avoided.
Neither the Istanbul or Astana declarations are mentioned by our Western partners in the discussions on European
security that are currently
taking place. We cannot
accept this.”
Morgan Artyukhina is a writer and news editor at
Sputnik’s Washington, DC, bureau... focusing on
international & breaking news. Born in southern Maryland, she studied Russian, Central, and
East European Studies, at the University of
Glasgow and is a former history professor.
At Sputnik, she covers military technology,
the expanding neoliberal police state, and
the ongoing struggles against it in the US
and around the globe.
Paul Larudee: Zionist Dream
Turning into Nightmare
November 25th, 5:26pm (FNA)
Paul Larudee, political activist and commentator,
says Zionists have come to this understating
- that Zionism is now nearing its predestined
self-annihilation.
Speaking in an interview with FNA, Larudee
said, “Zionism planted the seeds of its own
destruction the moment they created a
plan for a Jewish state in someone
else's homeland. It is increasingly
becoming an international pariah
...contributing to the wars and
conflicts in West Asia, South
America, Africa, and other
parts of the world. It only
creates more enemies
for them.”
Paul Larudee is an - Iranian-born - American political
activist who is a major figure in the pro-Palestinian
movement. Based in the San Francisco Bay area,
he is involved with the International Solidarity
Movement, & was a founder of the Free Gaza
Movement & the Free Palestine Movement.
Larudee was a member of the US delegation
aboard the 2010 Gaza Freedom Flotilla,
which was attacked by Israeli forces.
Below is the full text of the interview:
Q: Yaakov Sharett says “Israel and the Zionist
enterprise were born in sin.” What do we
learn about the nature of Israel?
A: Such words from a Zionist leader's son may help to
gradually sink doubts into the minds of other Zionists,
but we must not forget that many Jews were opposed
to Zionism for decades before 1948. It is unfortunate
that as Zionism became more successful in its
genocidal project, it also became more
acceptable to more Jews. But that is
now being reversed. As Zionism
becomes more racist, violent,
and aggressive, it is starting
to lose Jews who cannot
stomach such behaviour.
Q: Such a significant assertion was made by the son
of a signatory to the Israeli declaration in 1948. Do
you believe settlers will learn a lesson to end their
occupation of the Palestinians’ land?
A: There are two kinds of settlers that are being used
to colonize the West Bank and Jerusalem. The most
aggressive and violent are the ideological settlers,
who think of themselves as conquering soldiers,
much like the Europeans who took the land from
the native peoples in the western hemisphere.
They want to expel all Palestinians by any means
necessary, and take their land. They do not need
Israel to paint a rosy picture. They are ready to
endure hardship, although Israel actually
helps and enables them. The other type
are the opportunists. Israel builds
subsidized housing and industrial
parks on Palestinian land... and
makes it attractive for settlers
to move there. Israel creates
many advantages for them...
so as to increase the Jewish
population in the occupied
territories and push the
Palestinians out.
Q: Yaakov Sharett predicts a dark future for Israel
and asks settlers to immigrate from Israel; like-
wise, Lawrence Wilkerson, former Israeli State
Department aide, said Israel will be gone in
some 20 years. How do you assess
these statements?
A: Clearly, Sharett is being a realist in this case.
Despite Israel's influence, propaganda, bribes
and manipulations of other governments, it is
increasingly becoming an international pariah,
contributing to the wars and conflicts in West
Asia, South America, Africa and other parts of
the world. They believe that this makes them
strong, but it only creates more enemies for
them. Sharett seems to understand that the
Zionist dream is proving to be unsustainable.
It can only be realized by committing greater
and greater crimes, but even many Zionists
consider this too high a price for their dream,
and their dream is turning into a nightmare.
Zionism planted the seeds of its own destruction
the moment they created a plan for a Jewish
state on someone else's homeland.
UN Must Prevent Normalization of
Israeli Violation of Human Rights:
Iran Envoy
November 20th, 11am (al Manar)
Iran’s ambassador to the UN office in Geneva
put the onus on the United Nations: to take
action: against the normalization of the
systematic violation of human rights
and humanitarian laws, by the
Zionist regime.
In an address to a meeting between ambassadors
of the member states of the Organization of
Islamic Cooperation, residing in Geneva,
and to members of the Commission of Inquiry of the UN Council on Human
Rights, held on Friday, Esmaeil
Baqaei Hamaneh called for the
clarification of true and false
narratives, referring to the
stories... that equate the
victims of Israeli crimes
with the perpetrators
of the heinous acts.
“It is the duty of all of us to clarify the true and false
narratives, the narrative that equates the victims
of Israeli crimes, with their killers, which is
humanly shocking, legally unfounded,
and morally shameful,” the Iranian
envoy stressed.
He added that the inquiry commission has an historic
responsibility --- to prevent the normalization of
systematic human rights violations by the
Israeli regime.
The Iranian diplomat invited all the participants in the
meeting to call for justice; and not allow war crimes,
crimes against humanity, and blatant violations of
human rights, to become normal, Press
TV reported.
In May, the UN Human Rights Council agreed to initiate
an international probe into “systematic” human rights
abuses committed during the asymmetrical war
between ‘Israel’ and Palestinian resistance
groups in the besieged Gaza Strip.
The 47-member forum adopted a resolution presented
by Pakistan on behalf of the OIC and the Palestinian
delegation to the UN, by a vote of 24 states in favour, 9 against, and 14 abstentions.
The UN rights body agreed to establish “an ongoing
independent, international commission of inquiry”
into the war to probe the “underlying root causes
of recurrent tensions and instability, including
the systematic discrimination and repression
based on group identity.”
Israeli troops have, on numerous occasions, been
caught on camera, brutally killing Palestinians...
with the videos going viral online and sparking
international condemnation.
The Tel Aviv regime has been criticized for its extensive
use of lethal force against, and extrajudicial killing of,
Palestinians... who do not pose an immediate threat
to the occupation forces, or to the Israeli settlers.
In a statement released on Tuesday, the Palestinian
Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Expatriates, called
on the International Criminal Court to launch an
immediate investigation into the Tel Aviv
regime’s crimes, in the occupied
Palestinian territories --- after
the Israeli forces shot dead a
young man, in the northern
part of the West Bank.
Source: Iranian Agencies
Syria..to resume negotiations with the opposition... on constitutional reform. The question is, why?
by John Wight
October 20th, 11:26am (PressTV)
On a facile level the news that another round of UN-mandated
negotiations on the drafting of a new Syrian constitution... is
about to get underway in Geneva, between representatives
of the government and opposition groups... provides hope
that at long last an end to the inordinate suffering of the
Syrian people may be in sight. We are, after all, talking
about the most brutal and devastating conflict of
modern times, one that has resulted in 500,000
dead, the wholesale destruction of large parts
of the country, 13 million in need of
humanitarian assistance, half the
population displaced, and an
economy in ruins.
“You must be ready to burn yourself in your own flame;
how could you rise anew if you have not first become
ashes?” Thus writes the 19th-century German
philosopher Friedrich Nietzsche.
When applied to Syria the first part of Nietzsche’s admonition
formulation -- can be readily dismissed. Syria and the Syrian
people were, most assuredly, not ready to burn themselves
in their own flame. This horrific fate was thrust upon them
by internal and external agents, using regional upheaval
to advance a sectarian agenda, when it came to the
former, and an imperialist one, with respect to
the latter.
As for rising from the ashes, when applied to a country and
people that have endured and suffered to the extent that
Syria and its people have, the challenge in this regard is
monumental. Here, it shouldn’t be forgotten that Syria
remains under foreign occupation - by Turkish forces
in the north and northwest of the country, and by US
forces in the Kurdish-controlled east and northeast -
and that the Syrian opposition has been sponsored
by those very Western countries that have worked
tirelessly to ‘destroy Syria in order to save it’ over
the past decade.
Democracy, in a given state, or country, can only ever
flourish on the foundations of security and economic
stability. Try to establish a democratic system
absent of these non-negotiable pillars, and the end result is Afghanistan.
The Syrian people... have been engaged in a protracted
struggle to return security and stability to the country
with the indispensable aid of its Iranian, Lebanese
and Russian allies for over a decade now - and at
a huge cost. The idea, then, that those who
remained in Syria and endured so much...
should acquiesce in the role of a foreign
-based opposition when it comes to the
country’s future... will be a bitter pill
to swallow.
The key stumbling block to previous negotiations between
the government and opposition has been the status of
Bashar al-Assad. His removal from power has long
been a non-negotiable condition of the opposition
and its Western sponsors and backers, which is
precisely why there has been zero progress up
to this point, when it comes to achieving a
negotiated settlement.
The hard truth is that without external support the Syrian
opposition would be a marginal force at best. And, too,
an opposition willing to trade sovereignty for power is
a proxy, rather than a serious government in waiting,
especially given the scale of the struggle waged by
Syrian government forces, its allies and people, for
so long.
Regionally, meanwhile, Assad’s tenacity has begun to bear
fruit. In a recent Newsweek piece, Tom O’Connor confirms
that “the Syrian president has not only survived, but
appears poised to make a stunning comeback on
the world stage.” O’Connor elaborates:
“Recognizing reality, many of the countries that cut him
[Assad] off 10 years ago have begun to welcome him
back - despite ongoing US opposition to his rule.
Telltale signs: Just last month Jordan reopened
its border with Syria, and the Arab League is
widely expected to reinstate its
membership shortly.”
In some respects, then, the question needs to be asked:
What does the Assad government stand to gain... from
going into negotiations on constitutional reform with
a weak opposition at this particular juncture?
Much of the answer lies with the role of Putin in pushing
Assad to be more flexible and open to inclusiveness
when it comes to the opposition. Though Moscow
has played a major role in the conflict in Syria
since the end of September 2015, its support
has come at a price ----- one which suggests
that its status has been less that of an ally -
and more that of putative imperial overlord.
With this in mind, consider the words of former Russian
diplomat, Alexander Aksenyonok, as quoted in a May
2020 article by veteran Middle East correspondent
Martin Jay from May: “If Assad refuses to accept
a new constitution, the Syrian regime will put
itself at great risk.”
There is no doubting the fact that Syria has reached an
historic fork in the road after a decade of unremitting
conflict. The ocean of blood that has been shed, in
the course of the struggle for the country’s future
makes the tentative steps towards a negotiated
settlement a challenge for Assad's government
that will be well aware of the danger of
snatching defeat from the jaws
of victory.
Whatever the outcome of this new round of negotiations
with the opposition on constitutional reform, the over-
riding priority of the Syrian government remains
security, stability and putting food on the table
of its people. After all, in the last analysis,
you can’t eat a constitution.
End.
John Wight is an author and political
commentator based in Scotland.
(The views expressed in this article... do
not necessarily reflect those of Press TV.)
China is no threat
to people in the US; Wall Street,CIA & the Pentagon are
-- Analyst
October 16th, 3:14pm (PressTV)
US political analyst and activist Bill Dores says
China is no threat to the people in the US., but
Wall Street, the CIA, and the Pentagon, are.
Dores, a writer for Struggle/La Lucha and a longtime
antiwar activist, made the remarks in an interview
with Press TV on Saturday, after the CIA launched
a new mission centre to address what it calls “the most important geopolitical threat” posed... by China.
CIA Director William Burns said in a statement last week
that the new unit, called the China Mission Centre, will
“further strengthen our collective work on the most
important geopolitical threat we face in the 21st
century, an increasingly adversarial Chinese
government.”
Burns said that his agency will still focus on other threats
as well, including those emanating from Russia, North
Korea and Iran.
The CIA’s renewed attention to China is the latest evidence
of the Biden administration’s focus on Beijing as its main
foreign policy target.
Since taking charge of the White House earlier this year,
the Biden administration has been directing resources
toward countering China.
Why is the CIA targeting China?
“The CIA is grabbing more tax money --- to start a ‘mission
centre’ aimed at China, which it calls the ‘most important
geopolitical threat we face.’ This is ominous news
- considering the agency’s history of 'fabricating'
evidence to start wars, e.g. Iraq’s nonexistent
‘weapons of mass destruction,’” Dores
commented to Press TV.
“US troops have left Afghanistan. But not a dime has been
slashed from the bloated US military budget. Indeed, it’s
being increased to $778 billion from $753 billion to face
the alleged ‘Chinese threat.’ That’s more than the
combined military budgets of China, India,
Russia, Britain, Saudi Arabia, Germany,
France, Japan, South Korea, Italy
and Australia,” he added.
“It’s also been revealed that US Special Forces have been
operating secretly on Taiwan for two years. Meanwhile...
the US Congress will not pass the Build Back Better Act
to modestly extend our social safety net,” he added.
“The People’s Republic of China... has five times the population of the United States. But it spends only
$258 billion on its military. China’s forces are
deployed in - or around - the borders and
coasts of China. By no stretch of the
imagination is China threatening
he US militarily. Why would it?
For what gain?” he asked.
“So, what the Sam Hill is a ‘geopolitical threat.’ It’s a
twisted concept based on the twisted premise that
the United States, with 4 percent of the world’s
population, should dominate the world
politically & economically. And that
really means the billionaires and
millionaires, that Occupy Wall
Street protesters called the
‘One Percent,’” he stated.
China’s economic ‘threat’ to US
“China’s real ‘threat,’ in the minds of the US corporate
ruling class, is economic. China produces more than
the United States, and its economy is growing much faster,” the analyst said.
“It has achieved this, not by destroying the economies of
other countries with war and sanctions, but by growth,
and trade. China’s Belt and Road Initiative has greatly
weakened the stranglehold Wall Street banks once
held on the world economy. An article in the US
magazine Foreign Policy whined: that China is
‘whittling away’ at the murderous ‘sanctions
regime’ the US and West Europe use -- to
‘punish’ countries that defy their
dictates,” he explained.
“US corporations do, of course, invest in China. They make
a lot of money there. But they cannot dictate to China's
government the way US oil companies dictated to the
Shah of Iran before the 1979 Islamic Revolution. Or
the way they dictate to their paid servants in the
White House and the Capitol today,”
he observed.
“Politicians and news media tell working-class people in
the US that China’s growth is, somehow, a threat to our
well-being. They conceal the fact: that China’s dynamic
growth is the biggest single factor staving off a global
economic collapse,” he said.
“Yet it is their own Wall Street masters who have shut
down plants all over this country and foreclosed on
millions of homes. It is they who used the techno-
logical revolution as a weapon, to drive down
wages and destroy millions of jobs,”
Dores said.
Washington’s ‘hate China’ campaign
“Washington raises several phony issues in its ‘hate
China’ campaign. One is the alleged persecution of
the Uighur people in Xinjiang Province. There’s
nothing but hypocrisy here,” the analyst said.
“If this claim were true - and I’ve seen no reliable evidence
that it is - Washington would be the last to care. The US
leads the world in mass incarceration and murder
by police,” he noted.
“According to the Equal Justice Initiative... ‘Millions of
Americans are incarcerated in overcrowded, violent,
and inhumane jails and prisons.. that do not provide
treatment, education, or rehabilitation.' A majority
are from the oppressed Black, Latin and Native
nations... targeted by the police,” he said.
“Among the incarcerated are dozens of political
prisoners, such as Mumia Abu Jamal, Leonard
Peltier and Jamil Abdullah Al Amin, who have
spent decades behind bars on framed-up
charges,” he stated.
“Last year’s Black Lives Matter uprising..... highlighted
the extent of racist police murder in the US. Between
1980 and 2018, the US police killed more than 30,000
people. Half of those killings were misclassified,
according to a study published in the Lancet
medical journal,” he said.
US supports ‘ethnic cleansing and
murder of Palestinian people’
“We also can't forget that Washington not only supports
but subsidizes --- the ethnic cleansing and murder of
Palestinian people --- by the racist state of Israel,
including the mass imprisonment of 2 million
people in the giant concentration camp
called the Gaza Strip. The US also has
no problem with the oppression of
the majority Muslim people of
Kashmir, by the Indian state,” Dores noted.
“The US accuses China of stealing ‘intellectual property,’
a twisted concept indeed. Perhaps the West should pay
China for inventing paper, iron smelting, the seed drill,
the compass, rockets, gunpowder and other
innovations... that made its economic
development possible,” he said.
“There is the accusation of currency manipulation. But
Washington... has flooded the world with devalued
dollars ever since the Nixon administration took
the dollar off the gold standard in the 1970s.
The US has long used the dollar as an
instrument of financial warfare,”
he said.
Why is the US Navy in the South China Sea?
“And there is the issue of ‘free navigation’ in the South
China Sea. Which raises the question, what is the US
Seventh Fleet doing in the South China Sea anyway?
For that matter, why is the US Fifth Fleet off the
coast of Iran and the US Fourth Fleet off the
coast of Venezuela,” Dores said.
“Every year, ships carry $3.4 trillion worth of goods
through the South China Sea. Most of that is
bound to and from China,” he said.
“The PRC has no interest in stopping that commerce.
It does have an interest in keeping US warships
away from its coast and ports,” he said.
“For the past seven years, the US Navy has helped Saudi
Arabia impose a naval blockade that is starving the
children of Yemen. US sanctions, backed by the
US Navy, are the main obstacle to commerce
between nations in the world today,”
he said.
“Instead of new CIA mission centres, military bases and
fleets of warships and warplanes all over the world, the
US should do what China does: Invest in schools,
health care, housing, railroads and renewable
energy. Bring all the ships, planes, troops
and spies home. The world would be a
much better and safer place,”
he concluded.
Iran won’t let US, Turkey, Israel
create crisis in Caucasus
Sunday, October 3rd, 11:51am (PressTV)
by Sa’dollah Zarei
The fact of the matter is, that if there is no more time for
preventing a conspiracy from taking shape... there is
still time to thwart the conspiracy that has formed.
Here are some points with regards to this issue:
1) What the US, the Zionist regime, the governments of
Turkey and Azerbaijan, and the West in general, are
pursuing in the regions north of Iran is, firstly, a reaction to the great achievements of the
Islamic Republic and the resistance front.
When the criminal Zionist regime refers to the Republic of
Azerbaijan as “Lebanon of Israel,” it means that there is
a “Lebanon of resistance” that has foiled any Israeli
conspiracy over the past forty years and turned
into a major crisis for the occupying regime.
Why is a front led by the US, Zionist regime, Turkey and
Azerbaijan, talking about launching a pan-Turan move
-ment here? Because a powerful religious movement
has, for more than 40 years, disrupted the plots of
colonialists and criminals. So, it is quite clear that the enemy, although very hardworking, is in a state of “passivity.”
Here is another important question: will this evil conspiracy
ever yield any result? The answer is that there is a serious
antidote to prevent the realization of this tension-making
scheme, and if it enters the scene, it will definitely
thwart the plan, as it has happened so far.
2) Some people make a mistake here and say that the Syunik
agreement with North Karabakh... is a matter that concerns
the governments of Azerbaijan and Armenia and that Iran’s
objection to it is not a matter of concern. They argue that
the implementation of the agreement is to the detriment
of Iran’s regional situation, but it is a natural
consequence and thus does not create a
right for Iran to legitimize its opposition.
The answer is clear; This is not an agreement between the
two countries on a disputed region, but one on creating a
region meant to undermine the security, political and
economic position of a third country.
While acknowledging their military and political failure, in
Afghanistan, the Americans explicitly speak of pursuing
a proxy war model to make up for their defeat. Shortly
afterwards, it becomes known that they had sent a
signal to Azerbaijan to launch and attack and a
signal to Armenia to, in turn, show tolerance
and accept the post-war reality, and at the
same time, following the end of a recent
44-day Karabakh war, the US stated
that they 'support' the agreements
reached between Azerbaijan and
Armenia. All this suggests that
the US has been standing behind this war and the situation that ensued.
Simultaneously, the Azerbaijani government announced
the widespread use of Israeli attack drones in the war,
and the Armenian army called the UAVs the main
reason for its heavy casualties in the war. This
means that it was an American-Israeli war.
Everyone knows, that the administration of Armenian
Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan is a Christian govern-
ment dependent on the West, but it's interesting that
in this war, the United States and Israel destroyed the forces and facilities belonging to a pro-West
Christian administration, and supported a
Muslim government instead! Isn’t that
a telltale sign?
The question is, what kind of “proxy war” US officials
were talking about in the course of their withdrawal
from Afghanistan? Was it possible for the US to
start such a war in Afghanistan? Which forces
could be used by the US to launch a proxy war
in Afghanistan? Could the US bring the Taliban
- which was taking power - into a proxy war?
Proxy war with whom? The answer is no.
Was the Afghan army able to enter a proxy war? The
answer's clear. Was the army that was not even able
to defend Kabul for an hour, against the Taliban —
which took control of the capital without firing a
single shot — ready to enter a proxy war?
Could the old mujahedeen forces.. serve
as the proxies of the American war? The
answer is clear. The old forces, besides
having an anti-American spirit... have
currently no military capability. Could
the USA... create a ''proxy force'' in
Afghanistan, in the medium term,
with the Taliban et al present on the scene? The answer to this
question is also, no. This is
because... for at least the
next 50 years... US crimes
will be in front of the eyes
of the Afghan people, and
the prospect for any kind
of Afghan-American,
cooperation...
is bleak.
So, what did the Americans mean by a proxy war? In fact,
the Americans wanted a proxy war where there was a
fertile ground... and the required strength. From the
American point of view, the “ethnicity” factor must
be emphasized and turned into a winning weapon
against anti-American revolutionary uprisings.
The Americans have long focused on the
model of racism and pan-Turanism... in
the case of this region, and considered
them as “a possible solution,” or more
accurately, the last “remaining arrow,”
and pinned their hopes on it.
Therefore, the prominent role of this tendency, in the
developments in the north, and its overlapping in the
Caucasus, besides the intention to highlight the anti
Iranian and anti-Islamic edges in the rhetoric of the
officials of these countries, tell us that we are
facing a “semi-hard” proxy war.
When Azeri President Ilham Aliyev speaks openly in an
interview about the widespread presence of Israeli
forces and equipment in the Caucasus, and the
resolution of the Nagorno-Karabakh crisis, he
is, in fact, blowing the lid off a proxy war.
3) Saudi Arabia’s measures are yet another issue that is indicative of the proxy war in the developments
unfolding in Iran’s northwestern frontiers, on
the one side, and its scale, on the other. The
Saudis have explicitly said that they are
working to launch a 24-hour television
network for the Turkish region of the
Caucasus called “Turk national.”
Why is the Saudi regime in the Caucasus trying to launch
such a TV network? The people in this region are neither
Arabs nor Sunnis in order for them to be the audience of
a Sunni Arab country. At the same time, it is obvious that this decision cannot be implemented without the consent and cooperation of the governments in the region.
4) Naturally, on this front, Iran can't remain silent and turn
a blind eye to the dimensions and consequences of the
action that being along its borders; therefore, it has to
react, but what is the due reaction? There is no doubt
that military conflict & dragging Iran into the military
arena is a well-known policy of the American front.
On the other hand... we know that what is intended for the Caucasus region is not even a full-fledged military
war, let alone a regional and multilateral war. We
are thus not talking about a war in the sense
that it is perceived. We are talking about
actions that disturb the peace of this
region and the interests of the
powers around it.
Isn’t it true... that the Azerbaijani government says Israeli
drones and forces have been involved in the recent war
between the Republic of Azerbaijan, and the Republic of
Armenia? Isn’t it true that the Israelis explicitly referred
to the Republic of Azerbaijan... as “Lebanon of Israel”?
Since there are talks about the formation of a definite
security threat against the Islamic Republic, Iran has
the right to dismantle and confront the centre of
conspiracy against itself, without coordination
with any place or individual.
This type of Iranian confrontation is not so incomprehensible
to Zionists. Interestingly, an Israeli institution wrote a few
days ago: “Iran may want to retaliate against Israeli attacks
in Syria in Azerbaijan.” The regime is attacking areas in
Syria under the false pretext that Syria has become a
base for the presence of Iranian military personnel.
The Israeli institute asks what problem would arise
if Iran attacked a base in Azerbaijan, where Israeli
force are possibly present?
Of course, Iran knows very well how to use developments
to the detriment of its enemies. The Islamic Republic will
naturally begin with negotiations, to fraternally resolve
the issue between neighbours on Iran’s northwestern
border. Over the past 2 decades, the United States,
Turkey, and the Zionist regime have faced ultimate
defeat in any sedition that they incited and gotten
out of the situation while fraught with humiliation.
They are inciting sedition while they do not have
the power to tolerate and manage the war. If
these acts of sedition are not put aside, they
will face defeat, thanks to Iran’s measures.
(The views expressed in this article.... do
not necessarily reflect those of Press TV.)
It’s time for NATO to leave Kosovo
before it does any more damage
October 2nd, 10:36am (RT)
By Boris Malagurski, a Serbian Canadian documentary
film director, known for “The Weight of Chains”,
enlisted in the catalogue of the Library of
Congress, whose work has been show- cased on international festivals...
including Raindance in London.
Follow Boris on Twitter @malagurski
Just as it all ended badly for the West’s military interventions
in Vietnam and Afghanistan, so it will in Kosovo. NATO has
overstepped its mandate, overplayed its hand, and
overstayed its welcome.
As the last US military helicopters were leaving Kabul,
Afghanistan, many, including myself, emphasized the
similarities with America’s embarrassment in Saigon,
South Vietnam – but one parallel that few dared to
draw, was with Kosovo.
When I merely asked “Is Kosovo next?” on Twitter, it
sent Albanian media outlets into a frenzy. Kosovo’s
Albanian majority celebrates the NATO troops as
saviours – NATO bombed Serbia, to take away
control of its Southern province of Kosovo in
1999. Since then, NATO has been sponsoring
a nation-building project... that seemed to have culminated in 2008, when Kosovo’s
provisional authorities declared
independence from Serbia.
It wasn’t an ‘end of history’ moment. Serbia and much of
the world didn’t recognize Kosovo as an independent
country, and Kosovo itself remained heavily
dependent on Western aid... and military
support. Most Albanian politicians are
aware of this and they are highly
obedient with regards to NATO,
whose KFOR troops are
‘keeping the peace’
in Kosovo.
However, NATO has overstepped its mandate. UN Security
Council Resolution 1244, which put an end to NATO’s war
with Yugoslavia, guarantees Serbia’s sovereignty over
Kosovo, while NATO has pushed for an independent
Kosovo from day one of their occupation. The
resolution also called for... the return of an
agreed number of Yugoslav and Serbian
personnel to maintain a presence at
significant sites and key border
crossings.... NATO has never
allowed this to happen. The
last Serbian prime minister
who called for this agree-
ment to be honored, was
assassinated in 2003, a little over a month
after his request.
On the other hand, what are the results of NATO’s nation
building in Kosovo? Close to a 30% unemployment rate.
One of the poorest areas of Europe... with as much as
45% of the population living below the official poverty
line, and 17% being extremely poor. Former Kosovo
Liberation Army terrorists, some accused of
trafficking weapons and human organs,
replaced their military uniforms with
politicians’ suits and are governing
the entity. The previous president
of Kosovo, nicknamed ‘The Snake’
...is currently being tried for war
crimes, and crimes against
humanity, at The Hague.
He’s the one who unveiled the Bill Clinton statue in
Kosovo’s capital. Bill then came to celebrate with
‘The Snake’.
Kosovo’s recent license plate row with Serbia was just
the latest example of a leadership in Kosovo incapable
of dealing with real issues, but rather... going into
conflict... to cover its incompetence. Instead of
negotiating with Belgrade, Kosovo unilaterally
used force --- to implement the removal of
Serbian license plates. And all that NATO
was willing to contribute to deescalate
the tensions... was to offer its KFOR
troops, to replace Kosovo’s special
unit, without even trying to resolve
the essence of the dispute. What
is NATO still doing in Kosovo?
Probably the same thing it was doing in Afghanistan.
Hoping a bad decision to go in, will eventually pay
off somehow. But it won’t. It didn’t in Vietnam, it
didn’t in Afghanistan, and it won’t in Kosovo.
So it’s time for NATO to start packing
its bags.
The statements, views and opinions expressed
in this column, are solely those of the author,
& don't, necessarily, represent those of RT.
“Normalization":Betrayal of Palestineby Arab despots no easy road
by Iqbal Jassat
October 1st, 11am (PressTV)
Pinning Palestinians down while applying harsh
measures of violent repression -- accompanied
by a fanatical settler movement of arch-racists
given free reign to attack and plunder -- is a
notorious game Israel has elevated to a
daily ritual.
In fact the routine of inflicting war crimes has all
the hallmarks of a rogue regime entirely caught
up in a misplaced belief --- that to engage in ethnic cleansing, is a religious obligation.
Conflating Judaism with a racist political ideology
of Zionism has been part of a strategy designed
to deceive, distort and divert. It has its roots in
the first Zionist congress held on the eve of
the 19th century.
That this is well documented and widely known is
not in dispute. Indeed... awareness of Zionism's
goal to dismember and dislodge Palestinians
from their centuries old homeland and
forcibly impose thereon a foreign
entity known as Israel, has
always been a bedrock
for resistance.
Israel has thus always been considered an enemy
thrust upon a native population through the most
horrific forms of terrorism. The memories of Deir
Yassin remind the world of bloody massacres
committed by Zionist terrorists which didn't
spare hundreds of villages... to
colonize Palestine.
That more than seven decades later the expansionist
goals of Zionism are still being pursued at great
human cost to successive generations of the
indigenous Palestinian population, is
reflected in daily atrocities.
None of these facts, as attested to by historians, as
well as organs of the United Nations, are contested.
Though of course Israel and supporters of it seek
to distort and malign commentators who speak
truth to power, as anti-Semitic.
Yet against this background of terrorism and current
conditions siege, occupation, killings and mass
imprisonment - recorded and broadcast via
mainstream media for all the world to
witness - it is bizarre that a handful
of Arab regimes, have broken rank
with Palestine's freedom struggle.
And at a time when even Haaretz describes
the atrocities by Israel, as a pogrom:
"Residents of the Palestinian communities in the south-
eastern West Bank have experience of settler attacks
- when they graze their flocks, work their fields, or
even have a picnic on their own land.... But they
cannot recall an attack like the one experienced
Tuesday -- by the small communities of Khirbat
al-Mufkara, al-Rakiz and al-Tuwani. On Simhat
Torah, dozens of young Jews, most of them
masked, conducted what can only be
described as a pogrom."
The treachery associated with what has become known
as "normalization" is an outrageous manifestation of
betrayal and collaboration. Limited to the UAE,
Bahrain, Sudan and Morocco,.. these regimes
have in effect confessed that the protection
of their shaky thrones... counts for more...
than legitimate rights of the Palestinians.
As unelected self-imposed despots fearful of democratic
values, they have bargained that "normalization" with
the usurper of Palestine will "guarantee" safety and
protection for them. In other words, just as Egypt
has done, these oligarchs have outsourced their
intelligence networks and security apparatus to Israel, knowing full well that in doing so, they have abandoned Palestine.
Though the abnormality of the implicit recognition of an
illegal colonial enterprise, has been in sharp contrast
to countless Arab League resolutions... the deal of
"normalization" pushed by Trump and vigorously
backed by the Biden administration... has exposed these leaders - as surrogates of western imperialism.
The case of Bahrain's role in the "Abraham Accords"
reveals the soft underbelly of Arab dictatorships.
Besides being financially dependent on its
neighbours especially the UAE and Saudi
Arabia, Bahrain’s alliance with Israel is
designed to entrench its power and
crush any resistance to author-
itarianism or efforts towards
freedom and democracy.
In 2011, during the onset of the Arab Spring uprisings,
Saudi Arabia sent troops to Bahrain to suppress anti
-government protests. This trend continues today
by Israel --- equally committed to maintaining the
status quo, and preventing the success of any
popular uprisings.
In this context, one may justifiably condemn Bahrain’s gross insensitivity and abject abdication of Palestine's freedom struggle... as treacherous.
Showcasing Israeli war criminal Lapid’s visit to Manama
where he is set to open the embassy flying Israel's flag
is utterly outrageous. This follows the opening of a
Zionist embassy in Abu Dhabi, and will likely be
establishing one in Rabat. Sudan thus far has
reportedly said that it has no plans yet to
open an embassy in Khartoum.
Not surprising therefore that the Arab street across these
capitals have vowed to end "normalization". The iron-
fisted grip held by Arab despots notwithstanding,
human rights movements (many banned and
leaders exiled) have declared their outright
rejection of America's much-vaunted
Abraham Accords.
Stirrings in Sudan are becoming more vocal despite
Khartoum's attempts to silence critics. In Bahrain
the main opposition group, al-Wefaq National
Islamic Society declared Lapid’s trip as a
"threat", saying, "This is provocative
news and this trip is completely
rejected, and he (Lapid) should
not set foot on Bahraini soil."
Their message is clear: "Any (Israeli) presence on Bahraini soil --- means incitement."
Iqbal Jassat is an executive at the Johannesburg-
based Media Review Network (MRN), a socio-
political advocacy group, that concerns
itself with media and political analysis.
(The views expressed in this article do
not necessarily reflect those of Press TV.)
Greece And FranceTake First Step
Towards European Independence
Following AUKUS Debacle
September 28th (South Front)
by Paul Antonopoulos,
independent geopolitical analyst
Signing of Franco-Greek Agreement is the
beginning of supplanting NATO in Europe.
Of the 30 NATO member states, Greece is one of the few
to spend well over 2% of its GDP on defense, as agreed
upon by NATO Defence Ministers, in 2006. However,
Greece’s high spending (relative to GDP), is not
because it is positioning itself as a buffed-up
military state opposed to Russia, as per the
aims of NATO, but rather, to defend itself
against the threats of another NATO
member, Turkey.
With NATO consistently downplaying Turkish aggression
against Greece and the new AUKUS pact creating
distrust between the Anglosphere and the
Europeans... Greece has ensured new
extra security assurances against
its long-time enemy.
Greece’s strengthened partnership with France highlights
that the immediate consequences of the AUKUS alliance
are already being felt, as the two countries are making
the first serious steps towards a Europe independent
of Washington.
Alexis Papahelas, one of Greece’s top journalists, explained
that the Franco-Greek security pact is Macron’s “revenge”
against the Americans as it will strengthen European
autonomy. He also confirmed persistent rumours
that a defensive pact between France and
Greece was almost reached last year,
but ultimately broke down at the
last minute for “unknown
reasons.”
To put the situation in context, Greece for a year and a half-
received bids from six countries, including France, the U.S.
and UK for brand new navy frigates. The finalization of a
deal was continuously delayed... due to Greece’s
insistence, that a frigate purchase must include a defense agreement.
Greece signed its 12-month Mutual Defense Cooperation
Agreement (MDCA) with the US last year, but ultimately
did not decide on which frigate bid to accept. With
negotiations for a Franco-Greek defence pact
last year stalling, Athens ultimately decided
to sign the MDCA... with Washington. This
was rumored to be partially motivated
as part of 'negotiations' to pressure
the French to accept Greek terms.
However, with the sudden emergence of AUKUS, European
trust in the Anglosphere quickly diminished, and thus
galvanized Franco-Greek discussions on European
independence. And finally, a deal to purchase
three brand-new French Belharra-class
frigates, was stricken.
For his part, Mitsotakis said on Tuesday morning at the
signing of the agreement that:- “It is an historic day for Greece and France. Today’s development is an
initiative that responds to the demands of the
times on our continent. It paves the way for
an autonomous and strong Europe of the
future. Whether there is a timetable for
creating a European army: the debate
on European military autonomy,
evolves. Options such as this
corporate defense partner-
ship, move to this central
strategic choice.”
Effectively, Greece and France are advocating for a pan-
European military that would likely drive out NATO, as
the premier defensive pact in Europe.
Another demonstration that this pact is aimed at
supplanting NATO... is its careful wording.
Although Turkey was not mentioned
explicitly, there is little doubt that
part of the motivation for the
Franco-Greek defense pact
was Turkey’s unilateral
aggression in the
Mediterranean.
Even just minutes after the signing of the Franco-Greek
agreement, former Dutch diplomat Fons Stoelinga
tweeted: “EU autonomy in security and defense.
NATO still does not address the problem of
NATO-member Turkey destabilizing the
whole Eastern Mediterranean region.
France and Greece now react and
signed a security bilateral pact.”
The mutual defense assistance clause of the agreement
ensures that if Greece or France is attacked on its
territory, the other will come to assist, even if the
attacking country is part of other alliances.....
including NATO. This is an obvious message
directed towards Turkey, a NATO member
that on a daily basis violates Greek air-
space and threatens to invade its
Aegean islands.
These violations and threats receive no repercussions from
NATO as individual members are unwilling to risk their
economic relations with the country, whilst many
NATO leaders still believe that Turkey is a
bulwark against Russia.
France for most of its modern history, but especially
galvanized under President Emmanuel Macron.. had
an ambition of creating a more independent Europe.
The European experience under former U.S.
President, Donald Trump, and the recent
snub from President Joe Biden, with the
AUKUS debacle... has only increased the urgency of achieving European
independence from Washington.
Despite this ambition, as well as warning Europe that it will
become secondary in world affairs, if it does not become
independent, it appears that France can finally kickstart
its project alongside Greece.
Achieving EU unity is a difficult prospect, because minnow
states like Lithuania prioritize the interests of Washington
rather than the continent, but as Paris and Athens have
shown --- they will move ahead, in changing the geo-
political balance in the Mediterranean and will not
wait, while member states continuously bicker
amongst themselves on foreign policy issues.
If France and Greece can create strong foundations for an
independent Europe, it will only be inevitable before more
EU member states become interested in also being
integrated into a continental structure that is
independent of transatlantic alliances.
Why did the Taliban win against
the Americans in Afghanistan?
by Eric Zuesse
August 21st, 2021
Why did the communists win
against the Americans in Vietnam?
Why did the communists win
against the capitalists in the
Russian Revolution?
Why did the American Revolutionists
win against the British Empire?
I shall here propose an answer to all of them, because that answer applies to all such cases, as I'll explain:
When an imperialistic society is as corrupt as Britain has been since the creation of the British East India Company in 1600, and as America has been since the end of World War II in 1945, with its takeover and control by the MIC (military-industrial complex), which has inevitably produced the cancerous growth of America’s permanent-warfare state, what, then, is the reason to continue living by staying merely as a colonist or a vassal-regime (or even as the imperialist regime itself), which means, when the imposed regime is so profoundly corrupt --- as any
imperialist power necessarily is --- to accept such corruption, as this?
There’s something that is worse than dying... and it is to continue
living under a regime that one utterly despises. That’s a dragged
-out death, instead of a quick death. A regime which is as
corrupt as any imperialistic regime inevitably is, will be
intolerable for a significant number of the residents in
any one of its vassal-nations or “colonies.” Death, for
them, isn’t such a bad choice, if it means that they'll
go down fighting to overthrow it. They are driven by
the motivation, “Give me liberty, or give me death!”
This is a motivation that few, if any, of the imperialistic regime’s hired
soldiers (regardless of whether conscripted or not) can match. And
when they are foreigners who are fighting on a foreign soil (instead
of locals who are defending their land’s own locally determined
rulers), they especially and certainly cannot match such
motivation, because only the locals can be fighting with
a patriotic spirit. This is an intrinsic weakness in any
empire. And imperialist leaders tend to ignore it,
because they don’t want to understand how
repulsive they are, to virtually anyone but
their own boot-lickers.
Ultimately, the demoralization of a hired soldier’s continuing to place
his very existence in jeopardy so as to continue the war to enslave
and control the resisting local subject-population will mount high
enough to produce self-contempt, desertion, and sometimes
even suicide, in the oppressing power’s forces, especially if that’s a foreign power.
No longer will the rationalizations(that “We are protecting the residents here”) be able to continue fooling the invading-force’s soldier, and the imposed stooge- regime’s soldier. They both (the foreign regime, and its imposed local stooge-government or colony) are there really, to control the local subject-population; and, ultimately, enough of the oppressor’s forces will know this to cause the imposed stooge-government, to be conquered by those indigenous residents there - people who will be recalled as heroes, by the other
residents in that land.
This is an advantage that any revolutionists
have, against the imposed regime.
This is the real meaning of “martyrs,” in the deeper sense than
merely of a religious type — it is instead of the patriotic type; it
concerns the land -- and not necessarily any religion -- such as
Christianity, Islam, or Marxism. Their loyalty is to Afghanistan;
or it is to Vietnam; or it is to Russia; or it is to China; or (before
America became imperialistic) it was to America. And so forth.
It is to the local land, not to any dictators. It is to the country
that the foreign invader’s forces are occupying. The
invader’s forces and their imposed stooge-regimes
can’t match this motivation.
Similarly, when the American invaders were conquered by the
residents of Vietnam, the winners were the Vietnamese, not
really the communists; and, in fact, the Marxist philosophy
(or ‘religion’) subsequently has waned there. America, in
Vietnam, as in Afghanistan, was the invader, in a land
which had not invaded their own.
That similar situation exists in Afghanistan. The Sauds had invaded
America on 9/11, with the assistance of G.W. Bush, Condoleezza
Rice, and perhaps others in the Administration. And so, the U.S.
-imposed soldiers in Afghanistan couldn’t even possibly have
been fighting against Afghanistan for any authentically
patriotic real (factually true) reason, at all. Therefore,
lies were constantly needed by the U.S. regime, not
only against Iraq, but even against Afghanistan.
(Furthermore, if Bush’s objective had really been to identify whom
and how was actually behind the 9/11 attacks, then he would have
pursued that at the U.N. Security Council and would have gotten
unanimous backing for it, which would quickly have isolated
and led to the destruction of Al Qaeda. It could all have been
done without any war between nations, and also fully in
accord with international law. To the extent that 9/11 was state-sponsored terrorism, it was actually being
sponsored by the Governments of the U.S. and
Saudi Arabia.
George W. Bush, who was buddy-close with the Sauds, used 9/11 as
an excuse to trash both the U.S. Constitution and international law
so as to hoist yet higher his own tyranny, his own power - not only internationally but also.. in his own nation. An imperialist would,
of course, like to trash both, and to hoist his personal power as
high as possible. And GWB had the boldness to do it, and -
because America has been imperialistic ever since 1945
(i.e., international aggressions... have been America’s
culture since 1945) — he has been able to enjoy the
success of getting away with doing it. However,
everyone else, and especially outside America’s MIC, suffers from it.
What have the mere soldiers of invading and occupying
imperialist powers actually earned by having placed
their own lives at risk? Maybe a tombstone back
home, in the country that had invaded and
occupied that colony.
By contrast, even if a defending soldier has died as a
hero among the locals in a failed revolution against
the imperialist power, any tombstone will be
unnecessary to be that person’s memorial,
because the true memorial is in the heart,
and in the mind, of the locals there, not
in anything that is in the land of the
invading foreign power.
And, so, I propose that the answer, to the question here, is that,
whereas America’s Founders were waging war as heroes
(because their war was just), today’s Americans are
waging war as villains (because our wars are unjust
- imperialistic aggressions, instead of heroic
defenses against an aggressor). Between
America’s founding and the present time,
America has switched from doing war
against military occupiers, to doing
war as military occupiers.
And this, I maintain, is the reason why: “The Taliban’s 80,000
troops have retaken Afghanistan with cities falling like
dominos while the 300,000-strong government forces,
better equipped and trained, mostly melted and
surrendered with no will to fight.”
What today’s Taliban are to today’s Afghanistan is therefore what
the 1776 American Revolutionists were to the America of that era.
It’s not the ideology; it is the love of that land there, which has
motivated the residents’ forces to victory, against the forces
of the invading-and-occupying foreign power. This can
happen in any land, at any time.
America went into Vietnam focused on the “body counts.” That’s
how stupid America’s imperialistic leaders were, back then. The
only motivation they really understood was fear: “body counts.”
They’ve evidently learned nothing since. That is how corrupt
America is.
Right now in America, the ‘debate’ about Afghanistan is about Joe
Biden, who is basically irrelevant. He wanted to end America’s
military occupation there, just as Trump did, and just as
Obama did. He acted on it, whereas they did not — they
didn’t want to be accused by their political opponents
of having ‘lost Afghanistan on their watch’, but Biden
was evidently willing to risk it.
His only failure in the matter is that he kept lying to the American
people (and probably also to himself) about how chaotic the
evacuation would inevitably be, and about how collapsed
Afghanistan is, and has been, ever since the Soviets
invaded there in 1979.
Throughout America’s imperialistic era, the U.S. Government has
routinely been lying to the American people. Imperialism isn’t as
bad for the imperialistic nation’s public as it is for the conquered
land’s people, but it is very bad, even for them. The only people
who benefit from it are the billionaires, who control companies
such as Lockheed Martin, and ExxonMobil, and Amazon.
Those are the people (the owners), who hire the leading
politicians, including the members of Congress, and the
Presidents, to spread their empire, and their control.
They also hire the ‘journalists’ who shape their nation’s public
to support these invasions and military occupations. The
Government officials of an imperialistic regime represent
not the nation’s public - but its aristocracy - who hire and
appoint millions of the rest, the many agents (employees,
etc.) of the few billionaires. The billionaires really control
their country. After all: America is a thoroughly corrupt
country, just as any imperialistic country is. (All
imperialistic countries, are controlled by their
aristocracy. And every aristocracy is corrupt.)
The public in Afghanistan have long known this fact about America -
that it is corrupt. And this is the main reason why the Taliban now
rule that country. They represent that land. Not this land. It’s a
different culture, and a different place. To most Afghans,
America represents only corruption. There is nothing
unique about what is now happening in Afghanistan.
It has been happening for thousands of years, and
it’s just replaying an ancient script, but in that
particular location.
However, instead, the U.S.-and-allied media are focusing on Biden’s
bit part (which was always in a supporting role) in America’s
invasion and occupation of Afghanistan. So, probably
nothing will be learned from America’s invasion and
occupation of Afghanistan, just as nothing was
learned from America’s invasion & occupation
of Iraq, and from America’s invasion and
occupation of Vietnam, and from the
many other such post-WW-II
American foreign disasters.
For America’s billionaires, these have all been great successes
(very profitable); and, so, probably nothing that’s useful to the
American people will be learned from history; and, instead,
the myths will continue that have caused “The Military” to
be either the highest-respected or the second-highest-
respected of all of the 19 named institutions in America - the world’s permanent- warfare state.
The American military wastes the most money and the most blood
of any institution in America, but Americans nonetheless respect it
enormously. That, too, is a mark of an imperialistic country. The
way to control a public is to sustain the myths. U.S.-and-allied
billionaires make sure that it is done - however much it costs.
As regards the future of Afghanistan itself: On August the 19th,
the most reliable geostrategic reporter and analyst, Alexander
Mercouris, headlined at The Duran, “US Freezes Afghanistan
Reserves, Threatens Economic Crisis. Russia Works to
Establish New Government”, and he explained why the
Taliban will either cooperate with Russia, China, and
Iran, or else will degenerate yet further into a failed
state, especially because the U.S. and its allies will
do everything possible to strangle the fully looted
Government of Afghanistan — the new Islamic
Emirate of Afghanistan. So: even after the US
and its allies have all left that land, the war
against the people there will continue, in
full force, from the same people, though
with different methods.
PS: The philosopher Zizek headlined at RT on August 20th, “The
true enemy for Islamists is not the West’s neocolonialism or
military aggression, but our ‘immoral’ culture”, and he said
“it was not neocons who boosted Islamic fundamentalism,
this fundamentalism grew up in a reaction to the influence
of Western liberal secularism and individualism.”
He did not understand that though religious fundamentalists
(including the Taliban) focus especially on sexual and gender
issues, a person didn’t have to be at all religious in order to
consider the financial and economic corruption of the
imperialists and of their stooges to be disgusting.
Americans didn’t invade & occupy Afghanistan, in order to
spread “liberal secularism and individualism,” but in order
for US-and-allied billionaires to expand their wealth, their
empire, and their global control. Even if the Taliban and
other religious persons might object only (or even just
mainly) to the sexual and gender issues... a broader
segment of the Afghan population were repelled by
the rampant financial and economic corruption of
the imperialists, and of their stooge-rulers.
This was not a defeat for “secularism and individualism.”
It was a rejection of imperialism: a rejection of it even by people who don’t understand what “imperialism” means.
(Source: Strategic Culture Foundation)
Israel is committed to
aggressively pursuing
'Zionist colonialism',
says analyst
August 14th, 9:38am (PressTV)
A political commentator says Israel is relentlessly
following its "Zionist colonialism" in the occupied
Palestinian territories, and the evacuation orders
handed out to indigenous Palestinian families in the West Bank and Jerusalem al-Quds, are in line with the regime’s land
expropriation policies: to build more illegal settler homes.
“Israel aggressively pursues Zionist colonialism, which
has been the bedrock of the regime’s illegal ethnic-
cleansing agenda for the last seventy or more
years,” Iqbal Jassat, an executive member
of Johannesburg-based Media Review
Network, told Press TV, in an
exclusive interview
on Saturday.
He lambasted the Tel Aviv regime’s systematic theft of
Palestinian property as “a reprehensible disregard
for the inalienable rights of indigenous
Palestinians to their own lands
and homes.”
“The racist practice of evacuation, is a misleading
interpretation of forced expulsion, illegal under
the international law. It is also indicative of
the Group Areas Act [of 1950], under the
former apartheid regime of South
Africa,” Jassat noted.
The South African analyst also criticized the United Nations
and the International Criminal Court (ICC), for their
“impotence” ...to prevent Israel's unjust and
blatant violations of international
conventions and principles.
“It also raises serious questions about the inherent biases
existing within these institutions. These biases prevent
the exercise of law --- to halt land grabs, home demolitions, expulsions and incremental genocide,” he pointed out.
Jassat went on to say that Western countries’ decades-long
guilty conscience has prevented these states from
criticizing Israel, for its barbaric and brutal
practices, as such denunciations would
be treated as anti-Semitic.
“The US and its allies in NATO view Israel as a bulwark of
their interests in the heart of the Muslim world. They,
therefore, place their so-called security goals
above injustices against Palestinians,”
the analyst said.
“Moreover, the Arab world is mainly made up of unelected
despots, from Egypt to Saudi Arabia, the United Arab
Emirates and Bahrain. Their collective view, pivots
on the false notion... that their security is tied
to Israel. That explains the close proximity
between their notorious intelligence
services and Israel's Mossad
and Shin Bet.”
Jassat further noted that the controversial normalization
agreements that several Arab states have struck with Israel, have stifled opposition to the Tel Aviv regime’s colonialist and expansionist policies.
He said the unacceptable betrayal of the Palestinians'
struggle for liberation from the Israeli occupation,
has even resulted in the regime being granted
observer status, at the African Union.
Peak hypocrisy: US is ''concerned'' aboutChina's nukes
by Daniel Patrick Welch
August 7th, 11:45am
US Secretary of State Antony Blinken warns of
China's nukes, on the anniversary of his own
country dropping the only one ever.
The US empire never disappoints in its endless quest
to project the behavior of a true sociopath. As with
Goebbels’ Big Lie (which he stole from the US's
Bernays anyway), the tried-and-true strategy,
is to attack others, for actions it has itself
performed on a regular basis.
Hence the whole Russiagate charade about foreign
interference in sacred elections by a country other
than the US —reigning and uncontested champion
of regime change campaigns. Now comes Blinken,
the US talking head du jour on the world stage, to
warn Asia about China’s nuclear weapons. Huh?
If irony wasn’t dead, Blinken and crew (Winken, Nod
et al) would track it down and strangle it with their
bare hands. On August 6th, the State Department
announced Blinken’s warning... to China’s
neighbours: THE ANNIVERSARY OF HIS
OWN COUNTRY’S DROPPING OF A
NUCLEAR BOMB on Hiroshima.
I would say “not to put to fine a point on it,” but it just
can’t possibly be sharpened any further. Run that
back, with the reverse tape noise and all.
The ONLY country EVER to drop a nuclear bomb on another,
the United States, chooses the very anniversary of the first of those two genocidal crimes against humanity, to express grave concern about China’s nuclear
arsenal. I guess you could just drop the mic
here — there really is so little left to say.
What comes after tragedy and farce?
Even Old Man Marx didn’t mention
a third, though I might venture
Cynicism Made Flesh?
Of course, Blinken--I just can’t stop saying the name… it’s like
DICK Cheney and COLIN Powell, or that library cop Bookman
from Seinfeld—Blinken isn’t to blame for the blasphemy of
rewriting history. He and his cohorts have a generational
head start on stupid. Seventy-five years of relentless
assault on Americans’ knowledge of history and
political consciousness, has left a populace
with a Hollywood understanding of WWII
that has almost no relation to reality.
Even Eisenhower knew (and said) that the bombings were of no
military use. Lost to Americans’ history—but importantly, not
the world’s—is the cold truth that Truman knew as well and
didn’t care. Perhaps the meanest, and most small-minded
of US presidents, he offed a hundred thousand Japanese
in one fell swoop, just to scare the Russkies. And by his
own admission, never lost a night’s sleep. Brrrrrrrr.
But Back to the Future: Blinken’s degenerate idiocy also further
exposes the infantile disorder of the Lesser Evilists and the rest
of the Harm Reduction menagerie. He is himself, of course, no
more than a cardboard clown, or more likely made entirely of
wood, spouting vituperations like a useful ventriloquist’s
dummy while sitting on the knee of whoever plays Edgar
Bergen in this cynical farce. The masters who pay
Blinken, Biden, (O)Bama, Bush and Bacchus
keep them on a short leash. The sociopaths
in charge make the real decisions.
The notion that “getting back to normal” would yield anything other
than a smooth return to the endless killing machine was not just
wishful thinking, but deliberate self-delusion, a lazy and selfish
need to play pretend and self-soothe while the world burns.
Unforgiveable, really. From Iran to Venezuela, Russia, China and
beyond, and with clockwork precision, the Enemies of Humanity
are ramping up war fever, concocting lies & manipulating truth
and fear like never before. The New York Times’ perversion of
the Tokyo medal counts, to pretend the US won, is more than
instructive: it is the stock in trade and lifeblood of the
predator class, honing its exceptionalist rhetoric to
wield when needed. Dark days ahead.
Daniel Patrick Welch is a writer of political commentary and
analysis. Also a singer and songwriter, he lives and writes
in Salem, Salem, Massachusetts with his wife. Together
they run The Greenhouse School. He has traveled
widely, speaks five languages and studied Russian
History and Literature at Harvard University.
Welch has also appeared as a guest on several TV and radio
channels to speak on topics of foreign affairs and political
analysis--around his day job. He can be available for
interview requests as time and scheduling permit.
Despite the price of being outspoken against US foreign policy
and military adventurism -- which can be steep, in today's
circumstances -- he believes firmly, as did Rosa
Luxemburg, that "It will always be the most
revolutionary act, to tell the truth out loud."
Welch wrote this commentary for the Press TV website.
Russia-Chinathe Endgame
by Finian Cunningham
July 3rd, 1:41pm (Sputnik)
The consolidation of the Russia-China alliance this week
spells the endgame for Western imperialism and the
never-ending wars that it spawns.
Russia’s President Vladimir Putin and China’s leader Xi
Jinping celebrated the 20th anniversary of the Sino-
Russian Treaty of Friendship, first signed in July
2001. The hallmark of that historic accord is a
mutual commitment to peace, prosperity
and global stability.
As Putin commented, the alliance between Russia and China
is a vital source of “stability at a time of increasing geo-
political turbulence”. The latter remark is an oblique
reference to the US-led Western states which are
driven by ratcheting up antagonism and
tensions with Moscow and Beijing,
using all sorts of spurious
complaints.
The attempt by Washington (whether Republican or Democrat)
and its Western minions to make trouble with Russia and
China has become almost frenetic. Step back from the
daily headlines in Western media and it is glaring just
how much the agenda has become irrationally
hostile towards Moscow and Beijing.
Week after week there are unfounded allegations about
Covid-19, & so on. It’s like a mad cacophony to wind
up tensions. Nevertheless, the deranged attitude of
Western ruling cliques is but the death throes of a
world order that has reached its expiration.
Russia and China’s partnership has hugely transformative
geopolitical significance. Both these giant nations straddle
the continents of Asia and Europe, connecting the Pacific
with the Atlantic, ranging from the Arctic to the
Mediterranean. Both are committed to a vision
of a multipolar world where nations cooperate
for mutual development.
China’s Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) linking Eurasia with
Africa and the Americas is the vision of the future, and
Russia is a key partner in implementing that
ambitious win-win project for global peace
and prosperity.
This vision stands in stark contrast to the prevailing Western
capitalist paradigm which operates through dominance,
control and exploitation for American and European
profiteering. That kind of centuries-old system
necessarily involves imperialist conduct ...
whereby the natural resources of foreign
nations are commandeered by brute
military force, conflict, subjugation,
subterfuge, skulduggery and
other machinations.
The multipolar vision of global relations advocated by Russia
and China is the nemesis of the Western imperialist system.
And that explains why the Americans and their European
vassals make every effort to demonize and distort
Russia and China.
But the geopolitical potential of Russia and China is
unstoppable. There is a force of natural justice that
all nations will inevitably subscribe to as the only
reasonable, feasible & sustainable way forward.
It’s about people-centered development ...
versus profit-driven disorder.
Moreover, the partnership between Russia and China is a
geographer’s wonder study. Russia is the world’s largest
national territory by landmass. With over 17 million sq.
kilometres, it covers 11 time zones out of the world’s
total of 24. The abundance of natural resources that
Russia possesses is astounding, from reserves of
natural gas, oil, metals and minerals, to forestry,
agriculture and fisheries. It also can boast of
highly advanced technology in multiple
sectors. And... it shares a long land
border with China, for easing trade.
Meanwhile, China has a population of 1.4 billion people, ten
times that of Russia. With highly advanced technology and
manufacturing, China is not only a vast market for Russian
resources, it is also a gateway to the world economy.
China has already become the world’s biggest
economy over the United States, according
to some measures.
The US and Europe are post-industrial economies that are
also post-peak of their prime. Their “prime” was always
based on an extractive predatory relationship with the
rest of the world that was predicated on inflicting
conflict and poverty on others.
As China and Russia build on their strategic partnership for
mutual prosperity and peace the upshot will inevitably
entail the endgame for Western imperial powers,
which are atrophying from massive inequality,
indebtedness, moral decadence and
social decay.
Fortunately, too, and this is crucial, Russia and China have
military defenses from new generations of hypersonic
weaponry that make them impregnable against any
warmongering notions by the United States. A
failing empire like the US and its Western
satellites is always a dangerous time, as
it tries to prevent the inevitable collapse,
but starting a war with Russia & China
...is not an option.
The views & opinions expressed in the article
do not - necessarily - reflect those of Sputnik.
Barry Grossman:US, Israel
Adopting Bullying Tactics
for ICC War Crimes
Investigation in
Palestine
June 30th (FNA)
Barry Grossman is an international lawyer and political
commentator focused on human rights related issues.
He has been extensively published, on various legal
subjects and is a frequent commentator on political
affairs. He has taught law at the University of
Melbourne’s Faculty of Law and Monash
University’s Faculty of Law.
Below is the full text of the interview:
Q: How do you see the ICC ruling and the
issue of anti-Semitism raised by Israel?
A: To be sure, Benjamin Netanyahu has himself said that
“when the ICC investigates Israel for fake war crimes,
this is pure antisemitism”.
There can of course be no doubt that antisemitism is real;
indeed, every bit as real as Islam-phobia. But the long
standing ruse of conflating antisemitism with any and
all criticism of Zionism or Israel, is no longer taken
seriously, by a growing and very substantial
minority of people in the wider population.
Meanwhile the tactic of tarring everyone who resists Zionism
or criticises Israel with the antisemitism brush is having the
unfortunate, though not necessarily unintended
consequence of discrediting even the most
genuine efforts to draw attention to those
people whose speech is, indeed,
motivated by little more than
hatred for Jews.
Q: There are huge media attacks towards ICC’s probe to
Israeli war crimes in Palestine. Do you believe the ICC
can make a correct ruling under this media hegemony?
A: Propaganda about the ICC case published by the
Atlantic World’s Corporate Media Cartel is of course
preceded by pressure and instructions from think-
tanks, as well as the security/policy making
apparatus, which are, of course, fully
infiltrated by individuals promoting
Zionist agendas.
In that regard, both the US and Israel have openly declared
their hostile intentions towards the ICC and there is already
clear evidence that they're deploying all their usual tactics,
including intimidation, extortion, bribery and garden variety
corruption, to get politicians around the world, lawyers
involved in making Palestine’s case, and members of
the ICC to fall into line.
That said, if the myriad jurisdiction related technicalities
raised by Israel can be overcome, I am quite sure the
ICC is capable of reaching what many of us consider
the correct position regarding ubiquitous war crimes
and other violations of international law, perpetrated
by the occupation.
The real problem is that the ICC is quite limited in its ability
to enforce any ruling against responsible individuals and
Israeli organizations, so long as the key Atlantic World
nations continue to provide unqualified support for
the occupation, or, at the very least, to remain
neutral, in the face of clear evidence of the
occupation’s crimes.
A second very significant strategic issue arises from a
prevailing political reality which dictates that, in order
to make a reasonable finding about the occupation’s
crimes, the ICC will also have to use its authority to
investigate violations of international law alleged
against Hamas and other Palestinian groups ---
bearing in mind that the law of armed conflict
does not concern itself with the order in
which things played out and any finding
against Palestinian groups will certainly
receive far more traction, both in the
international community as well as
in occupied Palestine, than any
finding of culpability on the
part of the occupation.
Indeed, from where I sit, I do not see Palestine as
having much to gain from this process, but it
does stand to lose no small part of the
standing in public opinion, which it
has taken decades to develop, at
the cost of thousands of
Palestinian lives.
Q: Is it hypocrisy that Israel says Palestine is not
a sovereign state to have a delegation at ICC?
A: Hypocrisy hardly even begins to cover it. No nation
is in a position to dictate that Palestine is not a
sovereign nation-state, even if the UN has not
yet extended Palestine’s observer nation
status to full membership --- the way it
quickly recognized Israel’s existence
as a full member, in 1949.
It is also worth remembering that
31 UN member nations still do
not recognize Israel.
Of course, none of this is relevant to the Palestinian
delegation’s participation in ICC proceedings
investigating allegations of war crimes and
other violations of international law
committed against Palestinians by
Israeli nationals & organizations,
even though Israel is not, itself,
a party to the ICC treaty.
On the other hand, the Palestinian Authority (PA),
whose statehood and sovereignty has been
subject to intense dispute across the
international community... is a
signatory to the Rome Statute
(that is, the ICC Treaty), so it
would be bizarre, if it was
not permitted to have a
delegation present, at
the ICC proceedings.
Fearful of Yemen’s victory,
US resorts to direct
intervention in war
June 22nd, 6:36pm (PressTV)
by Jafari
(Jafari is an independent journalist and blogger.)
Battle rages on fiercely in Ma’rib and the other fronts of
the war in Yemen. After the Saudi mercenaries’ defeat
in recapturing the strategic al-Khanjar base in Khabb
wa ash-Sha'af District of al-Jawf Province, which
incurred very heavy casualties on them, it looks
like the continued expansion of the clashes
serves to indicate the frustration... of the
Omani side’s idea for the establishment
of a ceasefire. It is said that more than
200 of the attackers were either killed,
injured or captured, during the assault
on the base, most of the deaths being
caused by Saudi warplanes’ strikes
on fleeing mercenaries.
The Americans consider the war in Yemen... especially in
Ma’rib, to be part of their grand project for their regional
and international competitions. The American side’s
insistence on a cessation of the war and its ploys of
ending its military support for the invading Saudi-
led coalition could not, however, cover up this
grand strategy, and Yemen’s significance
within this strategy. In fact, these days,
the Yemenis are officially fighting a
coalition of Arab and Western
countries... at the same time.
The Omanis have effectively faced defeat in their mission
--- since Saudi Arabia has not made good on its verbal
pledges to them of leaving the humanitarian matters
(such as reopening Sana’a airport for travel towards certain destinations.. & allowing commodities & oil products into al-Hudaydah port) out of other issues.
It had been agreed, for the process of preparing and writing an agreement, to start... upon the return to Muscat.
Riyadh has, however, bottled out of its commitments &
mooted some conditions --- the most important among
which, is an end to all attacks in Ma’rib. According to al-Akhbar paper, the emergence of such a condition,
indicates that Washington has been more insistent
on imposing it on Sana’a, than Riyadh, during the
recent negotiations --- so it can stem Yemen’s
geopolitical role in the region and the world.
Expounding on this significant issue, the paper has unveiled
a portion of this grand strategy. Al-Akhbar’s report reads:
“Washington leaves no stone unturned to ensure the
simultaneous realization of a batch of its interests;
the Israeli interests in the Red Sea, and the Bab-el
Mandeb Strait as well as the American interests
in the Makran waters, and in the Indian Ocean,
pertaining to the US’s ongoing competition
with China. The US and China’s war over
various straits, maritime commercial
corridors, and vital islands, have
compounded the difficult pre-
dicaments. that concern the
Yemeni & Saudi sides, and
the tough political conditions that they set.”
“Yemen has turned into the main battlefield
in this war, due to its special geographical
position.”
The United States is going through fire and water
to prevent Yemen from exploiting its strategic
position --- and to stop Sana’a from gaining
control over the city of Ma’rib, and Ma’rib
Province’s oil facilities. Washington... is
taking all political & military measures
it has at its disposal, to get in the way of such a prospect.
It believes that Ma’rib’s potential liberation, would allow
Yemen to draw broad benefits from its strategic position.
It is of the opinion that, on Ma’rib Province’s recapture,
the Yemeni army & Popular Committees would set out
to liberate the western areas that overlook Bab-el-
Mandeb. Because of this, the battle in Ma’rib has
come to constitute the focal point of American
diplomacy, and risen to the top of American
Yemen envoy, Tim Lenderking’s, agenda.
The American envoy had realized that no one attaches any
importance to the superpower’s emissary in Sana’a!! He
then resorted to threats, strongly warning, during one
stage in the talks, that Washington would change its
tone... if the battle in Ma’rib did not end.
Elsewhere in its report, the Lebanese paper points to
Washington and London’s direct exertion of influence
toward an attainment of the goal. It notes that along -side the Saudi forces, a number of US and British
officers spearhead the Saudi-Emirati coalition’s
aerial operations targeting Yemen --- directly
managing the military operations in Yemen
and supervising the plans and tactics.
Under the new US administration, no new aerial operation
has been recorded against al-Qaeda terrorist organization
in Yemen. Daesh and al-Qaeda’s elements, who had fled to
al-Bayda Province, have been allowed to wage war along-
side the forces of the former Yemeni government of Abd
Rabbuh Mansur Hadi. The terrorists have also been
armed and assigned the responsibility of a number
of [battleground] axes too.
In fact, in addition to battling the Saudi & Emirati armies,
Hadi’s mercenaries, al-Qaeda & Daesh, the Yemeni army
and Popular Committees are directly fighting Britain and
the US. Direct participation in the war by US drones and
warplanes, signal the [US’s sensing a] necessity for a
change in the standing equations.
The US’s concern about the Yemeni army and Popular
Committees’ success may consist of only one aspect
of this issue, while Washington’s direct intervention
indicates that the Saudi army and its Sudanese and
Yemeni mercenaries, are far from capable of stop-
ping the Yemeni fighters. What Yemen stopped
short of achieving in the coastal area of the
mountainous Kahboub area in 2017 as a
result of direct Emirati intervention, could be easily regained.
Now, the American side is fearful that Yemeni fighters may
reach the rough terrain and restore their command on the
Bab-el-Mandeb Strait. This matter is of such importance
that a US army drone squad has deployed to the King
Khaled Airbase in Khamis Mashit, to directly gather
information about the axes of confrontation.
The recent crash of two drones in less than four days
bespeaks the extent of this intervention. On the one
hand, the American strategy of trying to push back
against the Yemeni army and Popular Committees
belies the new US administration’s allegation of
non-intervention in Yemen & attempts at ending
war in the country. On the other... it indicates
that the Saudis have suffered an ignominious
defeat... in the mission they have been assigned.
As stated above, the US’s policy of trying to keep the
Yemeni army and the Popular Committees away from
Ma’rib, takes pride of place in the US envoy’s mission in Yemen. Lenderking’s main problem, however... is that he lacks the necessary vehicles of exerting political & economic pressure on the Yemenis --- since these vehicles, have already been exhausted.
The only means that remain at the US’s disposal is military
intervention, which, in turn, would provoke the Yemenis’
have turned into major issues for the American side.
Because, with the American intervention rising to the fore
(as seen in the case of the ScanEagle drones’ crashes),
the Yemeni fighters’ retaliatory strength... would win
more credibility too. For the same reason, the US’s
positions in Djibouti, Saudi, inside Yemen itself,
and even the Persian Gulf region’s states...
could start coming under missile & drone attacks. This is something that Yemen’s drone and missile units offered a peek into, over Saturday and Sunday.
A Western-backed war
couldn’t destroy Syria,
now sanctions are
starving its people
by Eva Bartlett
June 16th, 5:39pm (RT)
Eva Bartlett is a Canadian independent journalist
and activist. She has spent years on the ground
covering conflict zones in the Middle East,
especially in Syria and Palestine (where
she lived for nearly four years). Follow
her on Twitter @EvaKBartlett
A little over a decade ago, Syrians lived in safety and financial
security. After ten years of war on Syria, while safety has
largely returned, Syrians are struggling to exist under
increasingly crippling Western sanctions.
As Syrian analyst Kevork Almassian noted, “Were it not for the
CIA regime change war, arming & training tens of thousands
of multinational terrorists, draconian sanctions, foreign
occupation of North & East, looting the oil & burning
the wheat, Syria would've now a brilliant economy
& high standard of living.”
When I first visited Syria in 2014, and in the years following,
mortars and missiles fired from terrorist groups occupying
eastern Ghouta pummeled Damascus on a daily basis.
Likewise in government-controlled areas of Aleppo,
and elsewhere around Syria.
Parents never knew if their children would return from school,
or be shelled while at school. Untold numbers of Syrian
civilians have been maimed over the past decade by
such shelling, untold numbers more killed.
So one might expect that in 2021, with most of the terrorism
in Syria eradicated, Syrians would have begun returning to
the normal lives they had ten years prior. But the brutal
sanctions have truly wrought hell on Syrians over the
years, and under the latest ones, life has gotten
exponentially worse.
Last year, I was in Syria for half of the year, after the borders
closed due to Covid confusion. With ample time on hand,
I walked for hours around Damascus, daily. One after-
noon, wanting to get a good view of the city, I walked
along narrow lanes going up the side of Qasioun
mountain, encountering locals who spoke of
community and supporting one another
in hard times.
I had stopped to take a photo of the vista when a young girl's
voice called out to me. Shortly after, I was seated in her
family's humble sitting room, drinking cold water and
talking with the family.
Only by chance did I learn that the father was ill with prostate
cancer and suffering greatly for a want of affordable
medications, increasingly difficult to get a hold of
due to the sanctions. And that was in April,
before the sadistically-named Caesar
Syria Civilian Protection Act came
into effect, months later.
I say sadistically, because these sanctions, while ostensibly
intended to target the Syrian government and its allies, in
order to punish and discourage supposed “war crimes”
against civilians, in reality inflict endless misery on
those same Syrian civilians. This is, as I wrote,
something former US envoy for Syria, James
Jeffrey, boasted about, reportedly saying
that the sanctions “contributed to the
collapse of the value of the
Syrian pound.”
US sanctions are part of a multi-front war on Syria,
and its long-suffering civilians are the main target.
It’s a pattern we’ve already seen with Western sanctions
– in Venezuela, they have not only made people’s lives
hell, but, as I also wrote, have killed up to 40,000
Venezuelans in the span of one year, according
to the Center for Economic & Policy Research.
A recent guest article in the Financial Times addressed
with particular attention to the sanctions, noting
that 60% of Syrians are suffering from
food insecurity.
That number might actually be significantly higher, as in
a July 2020 article detailing the illegality of the sanctions,
the author cited 83% of the population living below the
poverty line. That article noted, because of the
Caesar sanctions:
“Unlike the pre-existing sanctions, they apply to transactions
anywhere in the world that engage the Syrian Government or
certain sectors of the Syrian economy, even when those
transactions have no connection to the United States.
“Such sanctions cripple a state’s economy; disrupt the
availability of food, medicines, drinking water, and
sanitation supplies; interfere with the functioning
of health and education systems; and undermine
people’s ability to work.”
These are not unintended effects – they are the whole idea.
The FT article notes that after the Caesar Act came into effect,
the Syrian pound, “lost almost 70% of its value against the
dollar in the following months. This spurred an inflationary
spiral affecting food prices, which more than tripled
in 2020.”
And, in contrast to how the US pretends to “protect” Syrians
with these sanctions, the Caesar Act is, “severely affecting
the local economy especially in the construction, energy,
and financial sectors, blocking any possibility of
reconstruction in this phase of lower-
intensity conflict.”
Although I continued to follow events in Syria after leaving in
late September 2020, when I returned in the last week of May
this year, even I was surprised at the skyrocketed cost of
basic things. About half a kilo of hummus that was 400
Syrian pounds last year is 2,200 now. At the current
official exchange rate of 2,500 that’s slightly less
than a dollar – but the average salary in Syria is
around 50-60,000 Syrian pounds/month.
The FT article noted a kilogram of beef “costs about a
quarter of a public employee’s average monthly salary.
For perspective, in Italy this translates as €700 per kg.
In the UK? £300 per lb.”
I chatted with a friend who has just one child. He described
spending 15,000 (about $6) on vegetables, that would last
several days. That's a quarter of his salary gone, and
many expenses still to pay.
In the Midan district of Damascus—an area usually brimming
with shoppers coming for the famous sweet shops there, but
not crowded the day I went—a cigarette vendor I spoke with
described how he struggles to provide food for his wife and
two sons. Like the majority of Syrians, selling cigarettes is a
second job for him. Some are working three jobs, morning
to late evening, and still can't make ends meet.
He spoke of the self-sufficiency Syria had prior to the war,
how everyone had work, but now, people are suffocating.
“We are rationing! I used to buy a kilo of meat every month,
but now I buy 200 grams. My salary is 55,000, and if I can
earn 50,000 from this second work, I will have 100,000
Syrian pounds. But, this amount is still not enough.”
“Yesterday, I bought some yogurt, cheese, a box of mortadella
(meat), and a box of tissues. I paid 11,000 Syrian pounds. This
is for one day, and just breakfast.”
He said a dearth of fertilizers and insecticides, due to
sanctions, is directly impacting the agricultural sector.
While in Damascus, I also met with French humanitarian,
Pierre Le Corf, who has lived in Syria for six years, most
of that time in Aleppo. Le Corf, working and living with
some of the poorest and most affected Syrians in
Aleppo, spoke of how the sanctions are designed
to kill hope, in addition to killing civilians.
“You might not see people starving in the street, but that's
not what suffering is. People are suffering in silence. More
and more, the youth are leaving the country, not because
they want to leave Syria or feel oppressed, but because
they feel that they have no hope anymore.
The currency went from 50 Syrian pounds [for a dollar,
before the war] to 4,000 Syrian pounds. People work
from morning to night, and at the end of the day,
their kids might ask for a banana. One kilogram
of bananas is 5,000 Syrian pounds. When you
earn 60,000 a month...”
He spoke of the pressure the US puts on every company
and person who deals with Syria, that they can be
imprisoned, fined. “They are forcing companies
to not work with Syria,” to isolate Syria.
“I know families for who I'm trying to figure out how to bring
them medicines that they can't find any more. A week ago, I
went to bury a guy who we had been bringing medicine,
because we couldn't find it any more. It became 90,000
pounds a box, he needed four boxes a month. He
needed more medicine and better treatment - that
we can't have, because it’s forbidden. Forbidden
why? Because they pretend it's 'double use',
maybe it could be used for the army. The
people are paying the price, no
one else.”
In an interview on Syria Insider, British journalist
Vanessa Beeley condemned on the sanctions
against Syria, saying:
“Western governments are starving the Syrian people.
They are depriving them of their right to return home,
because the rebuilding process is being delayed.
They are punishing the Syrian people for the
resistance of the Syrian people against what
they want to impose upon them. It's nothing t
o do with the Syrian government or
President Assad.”
Sanctions are never ever non-lethal practises. They are
almost the most lethal of all weapons used in the hybrid
war against the people of a targeted nation.
“At the same time as the sanctions are in place, the West
is stealing the oil, burning the food resources, selling the
food resources outside of Syria, all to deprive the Syrian
people of their own resources, of the abundance of their
own country.”
In a recent, detailed, presentation focussing on the
sanctions, Beeley highlighted their effects not only
on incomes, food, medicines, but also on fuel,
industry, agriculture, health care and
hospitals, electricity and water.
She aptly noted: “One could argue that the US Coalition
is responsible for genocide in Syria, under Genocide
Convention article II (e) – deliberately inflicting on
the group, conditions of life calculated to bring
about its physical destruction in whole or
in part.”
In US President Joe Biden’s meeting with Russia’s Vladimir
Putin today, perhaps among the scripted talking points
there was tut tutting of Syria and Russia's alleged
preventing of humanitarian aid, a tired old trope
debunked but still trumpeted by hypocrites in
the West.
And while such integrity-devoid Western representatives
launch accusation after accusation at Syria and Russia,
it is abundantly clear that the suffering of Syrians is a
product of the illegal war on Syria and the deadly,
criminal, sanctions against the Syrian people.
The statements, views and opinions expressed in this
column are solely those of the author and do
not necessarily represent those of RT.
US Encirclement of China:
A 'Progress' Report
by Brian Berletic
May 22nd (The Saker)
We post this long-read article in full -
as the New Eastern Outlook site has
been down for a number of days.
Tensions between Washington and Beijing are not merely
the recent results of former US President Donald Trump’s
time in office – but rather, just the latest chapter in US
efforts to contain China, that stretch back decades.
Indeed, US foreign policy has, for decades, admittedly aimed at encircling and containing China’s rise, and maintaining primacy over the Indo-Pacific region.
The “Pentagon Papers” leaked in 1969 would admit in
regards to the ongoing US war against Vietnam that:
…the February decision to bomb North Vietnam and the
July approval of Phase I deployments make sense only
if they are in support of a long-run United States policy
to contain China.
The papers also admitted that China, “looms as a major
power threatening to undercut [American] importance
and effectiveness in the world and, more remotely but
more menacingly, to organize all of Asia against
[America].
The papers also made it clear that there were (and still are),
“three fronts to a long-run effort to contain China: (a) the
Japan-Korea front; (b) the India-Pakistan front; and (c)
the Southeast Asia front.”
Since then, it is clear that from the continued US military
presence in both Japan and South Korea, the now two
decades-long US occupation of Afghanistan on both
Pakistan’s and China’s borders, and the emergence
of the so-called “Milk Tea Alliance” aimed at over-
throwing Southeast Asian governments friendly
with China and replacing them with US-backed
client regimes – this policy to contain China
endures up to today.
Assessing US activity along these three fronts reveals
the progress and setbacks Washington faces -- and
the various dangers to global peace and stability
Washington’s continued belligerence poses.
The Japan-Korea Front
Military.com in their article, “Here’s What It Costs to
Keep US Troops in Japan and South Korea,” reports:
In all, more than 80,000 US troops are deployed to Japan
and South Korea. In Japan alone, the US maintains more
than 55,000 deployed troops — the largest forward-
deployed US force anywhere in the world.
The article notes that according to the US Government
Accountability Office (GAO), the US spent “$34 billion
to maintain military presences in Japan and South
Korea between 2016 and 2019.”
The article cites the GAO providing an explanation as to
why this massive US military presence is maintained in
East Asia:
“…US forces help strengthen alliances, promote a free
and open Indo-Pacific region, provide quick response
to emergencies and are essential for US national
security.”
“Alliances” that are “strengthened” by the physical
presence of what are -- essentially, -- occupying US
forces, suggests the “alliance” is hardly voluntary and claims of promoting a “free and open Indo- Pacific region” is highly subjective – begging the question of, to whom, is the Indo-Pacific “free and open”.
And as US power wanes both regionally in the Indo-
Pacific as well as globally, Washington has placed
increasing pressures on both Japan and South
Korea to not only help shoulder this financial
burden, but to also become more proactive
within Washington’s containment strategy
toward China.
Japan is one of three other nations (the US itself,
Australia, and India) drafted into the US-led
Quadrilateral Security Dialogue – also
known as the “Quad.”
Rather than the US solely depending on its own military
forces based within Japanese territory or supported by
its Japan-based forces, Japan’s military along with
India’s and Australia’s are also being recruited to
take part in military exercises and operations
in and around the South China Sea.
India’s inclusion in the Quad also fits well into the US
3-front strategy that made up Washington’s contain-
ment policy toward China as early as the 1960s.
The India-Pakistan Front
In addition to recruiting India into the Quad alliance, the
US helps encourage escalation through political
support and media campaigning of India’s
various territorial disputes with China.
The US also targets Pakistan’s close and ongoing
relationship with China – including the support of
armed insurgents in Pakistan’s Baluchistan
province.
Recently, a bombing at a hotel in Quetta, Baluchistan
appears to have targeted China’s ambassador to
Pakistan, Ambassador Nong Rong.
The BBC in its article, “Pakistan hotel bomb:
Deadly blast hits luxury venue in Quetta,”
would claim:
Initial reports had suggested the target
was China’s ambassador.
Ambassador Nong Rong is understood to be in Quetta
but was not present at the hotel at the time of the
attack on Wednesday.
The article also noted:
Balochistan province, near the Afghan border,
is home to several armed groups, including
separatists.
Separatists in the region want independence from the
rest of Pakistan and accuse the government and
China of exploiting Balochistan, one of
Pakistan’s poorest provinces, for its
gas and mineral wealth.
Absent from the BBC’s reporting is the extensive and
open support the US government has provided these
separatists over the years and how – clearly – this is
more than just a local uprising against perceived
injustice, but yet another example of armed
conflict-by-proxy waged by Washington
against China.
As far back as 2011 publications like The National
Interest in articles like, “Free Baluchistan” would
openly advocate expanding US support for
separatism in Pakistan’s Baluchistan
province.
The article was written by the late Selig Harrison
--- who was a senior fellow at the US-based
(corporate-financier funded) Centre for
International Policy --- & would claim:
Pakistan has given China a base at Gwadar in the
heart of Baluch territory. So an independent
Baluchistan... would serve US strategic
interests, in addition to the immediate
goal, of countering Islamist forces.
Of course, “Islamist forces”... is a euphemism for US-
Persian Gulf state sponsored militants used to both
fight Western proxy wars, as well as serve as a
pretext for Western intervention. Citing
“Islamist forces” in Baluchistan,
Pakistan - clearly - serves as an example of the latter.
In addition to op-eds published by influential policy
think tanks, US legislators like US Representative
Dana Rohrabacher, had proposed resolutions
such as (emphasis added),
“US House of Representatives Concurrent Resolution
104 (112th): Expressing the sense of Congress that
the people of Baluchistan, currently divided
between Pakistan, Iran, and Afghanistan,
have the right to self-determination and
to their own sovereign country.”
There is also funding provided to adjacent, political
groups supporting separatism in Baluchistan,
Pakistan, as listed by the US government’s
own National Endowment for Democracy
(NED) website under “Pakistan.”
Organizations like the “Association for Integrated
Development Balochistan” are funded by the US government and used to mobilize people
politically, constituting clear interference
by the US, in Pakistan’s internal
political affairs.
The Gwadar Port project is a key juncture within China’s
growing global network of infrastructure projects, as
part of its One Belt, One Road initiative. The US
clearly opposes China’s rise & has articulated robust strategies to counter it; everything up to and including, open war, as seen in the Pentagon Papers, regarding the Vietnam War.
The recent bombing in Baluchistan, Pakistan demonstrates
that this strategy continues, in regards to utilizing local
militants to target Chinese-Pakistani co-operation, and
is one part of the much wider, region-wide strategy:
of encircling and containing China.
The Southeast Asia Front
Of course the US war against Vietnam was part of a wider
effort to reassert Western primacy over Southeast Asia
...and deny the region from fueling China’s inevitable rise.
The US having lost the war and almost completely retreating
from the Southeast Asia region saw Southeast Asia itself
repair relations amongst themselves and with China.
Today, the nations of Southeast Asia count China as their
largest trade partner, investor, a ''key partner'' in infra-
structure development, a key supplier for the region’s
armed forces, as well as providing the majority of
tourism arrivals throughout the region. For
countries like Thailand, more tourists
arrive from China, than from all
Western nations combined.
Because existing governments in Southeast Asia have
nothing to benefit from by participating in American
belligerence toward China, the US has found it
necessary to cultivate and attempt to install
into power various client regimes. This has
been an ongoing process, since the
Vietnam War.
The US has targeted each nation individually for years.
In 2009 & 2010, US-backed opposition leader-in-exile,
Thaksin Shinawatra, deployed his “red shirt” rioters
in back-to-back riots - the latter of which included
some 300 armed militants and culminated in city-
wide arson across Bangkok, and the death of
over 90 police, soldiers, protesters, and
bystanders.
In 2018, US-backed opposition groups took power in
Malaysia after the US poured millions of dollars, for
over a decade, in building up the opposition.
Daniel Twining of the US National Endowment for Democracy subsidiary – the International
Republican Institute – admitted, during a talk by the Center for Strategic & International Studies, that same year, that:
…for 15 years working with NED resources, we worked
to strengthen Malaysian opposition parties -- and guess
what happened 2 months ago after 61 years? They won.
He would elaborate on how the NED’s network played a
direct role in placing US-backed opposition figures into
power, within the Malaysian government, stating:
I visited and I was sitting there with many of the leaders
the new leaders of this government, many of whom
were just our partners we had been working with
for 15 years and one of the most senior of them
who’s now one of the people running the
government said to me, ‘gosh IRI you
never gave up on us even when we
were ready to give up
on ourselves.’
Far from “promoting freedom” in Malaysia ---- Twining
would make clear the ultimate objective of interfering
in Malaysia’s internal political affairs, was to serve
US interests, not only in regards to Malaysia, but
in regards to the entire region and specifically
toward encircling and containing China.
Twining would boast:
…guess what one of the first steps the
new government took? It froze Chinese
infrastructure investments.
And that:
[Malaysia] is not a hugely pro-American country. It is
probably never going to be an actual US ally, but this
is going to redound to our benefit, and and that’s
an example of the long game.
It is a pattern that has repeated itself in Myanmar over
the decades --- with NED money building a parallel
political system within the nation and eventually
leading to Aung San Suu Kyi and her US-backed
National League for Democracy (NLD) party
taking power in 2016.
For Myanmar, so deep and extensive is US backing for
opposition groups there, that the elections virtually
guarantee US-backed candidates win.. every single
time. The US National Endowment for Democracy’s
own website alone... lists over 80 programs and
organizations receiving US government money
- for everything from election polling, and
building up political parties - to funding
media networks and “environmental”
groups used to block any Chinese-
initiated infrastructure projects.
The move by Myanmar’s military in February this year,
ousting Aung Sang Suu Kyi and the NLD, was meant to correct this.
However, in addition to backing political groups
protesting in the streets, the US has – for many
decades – backed and armed ethnic rebels
across the country. These rebels have now
linked up with the US-backed NLD and are
repeating the US-backed regime change
tactics used against the Arab World in 2011 --- in nations like Libya, Yemen,
and Syria – including explicit calls
for “international intervention.”
A US-Engineered “Asia Spring”
Just as the US did during the 2011 “Arab Spring” – the US
State Department, in a bid to create synergies across
its various regime change campaigns in Asia, has
introduced the “Milk Tea Alliance” to transform
individual US-backed regime change efforts in Asia, into a region-wide crisis.
The BBC itself admits in articles like, “Milk Tea
Alliance: Twitter creates emoji for pro-
democracy activists,” and that:
The alliance has brought together anti-Beijing protesters, in Hong Kong and Taiwan, with pro-democracy campaigners in Thailand and Myanmar.
Omitted from the BBC’s coverage of the “Milk Tea Alliance”
(intentionally) is the actual common denominators that
unite it – US funding through fronts like the National
Endowment for Democracy and a unifying hatred
of China - based exclusively on talking points
pushed by the US State Department itself.
Circling back to the Pentagon Papers and recalling the
coordinated, regional campaign the US sought to
encircle China with – we can then look at more
recent US government policy papers like the
“Indo-Pacific Framework” published in the
White House archives from the Trump
administration.
The policy paper’s first bullet point asks:
How to maintain US strategic primacy in the Indo-Pacific
region, and promote a liberal economic order, while
preventing China from establishing new, illiberal
spheres of influence, and cultivating areas of
cooperation to promote regional peace
and prosperity?
The paper also discusses information campaigns designed
to “educate” the world about “China’s coercive behaviour
and to influence operations around the globe.” These
campaigns have materialized in a propaganda war
fabricating accusations of “Chinese genocide” in
Xinjiang, China, claims that Chinese telecom
company Huawei is a global security threat,
and that China – not the US – is the single
largest threat to global peace and
stability today.
In reality US policy aimed at encircling China -- is
predicated upon Washington’s desire to continue
its own decades-long impunity upon the global
stage, and the continuation of all the wars,
humanitarian crises, and abuses, that
have stemmed from it.
Understanding the full scope of Washington’s
“competition” with China... helps unlock the
confusion surrounding unfolding individual
crises like the trade war; the ongoing
violence and turmoil in Myanmar;
bombings in southwest Pakistan;
students mobs in Thailand; riots
in Hong Kong; and attempts by
the US to transform the South
China Sea, into an inter- national conflict.
Understanding that these events are all connected - then
assessing the success or failure of US efforts - gives us a clearer picture of the overall success of Washington in encircling China. It also gives governments and
regional blocs a clearer picture of how to manage policy, in protecting against US subversion: that threatens national, regional, and global peace
and stability.
Brian Berletic, is a Bangkok-based geopolitical researcher and writer, especially for the online magazine “New Eastern Outlook”.
Australians should be ashamed that they have a regime propped up to serve US racist agendas!
How Exceptional America Is
by Eric Zuesse
September 30th, 2020
America is becoming exceptionally exceptional. In some votes
at the UN General Assembly - the Assembly of nations - only
Israel, or one or two other U.S. allies, vote along with it, and
all others either vote against it, or else abstain in order to
prevent U.S. retaliation against their own nation. No other
nation is anything like that. In fact, on many occasions,
the U.S. arm-twists other delegations -- in order to get
them to abstain from voting so as to make less stark,
and less embarrassing, America’s international
isolation. But America is also extraordinarily
exceptional in other ways, which have
nothing to do with the UN.
America is truly an exceptional nation. As the
Republican Party magazine National Review
stated, on September 15th, “Last week,
the US and Israel were the only states to vote against a General Assembly resolution on the coronavirus response. Some have seized upon that vote to paint the
USt as a bad faith actor that stands alone in the world.”
However, this vote wasn’t about only “the global
coronavirus response.” It was — perhaps even
more importantly - about U.S. sanctions against
Iran, Venezuela, Syria, Russia, China, and other
countries that the U.S. regime considers to be
its enemies. (None of these countries ever
invaded or even threatened to invade
the USA; all of those sanctions are
100% U.S. aggression.
They are target-countries that America’s aristocracy
wants to take over. (The world’s U.S.-sanctioned
countries are marked in red -- on the map of the
world below.) Israel strongly supports sanctions
against both Syria and Venezuela, and routinely
invades and bombs Syria just for good measure.
So, it joined America’s position on that.
That UN General Assembly vote was held on September
11th. America’s Associated Press bannered the next day,
“UN assembly approves pandemic resolution; US, Israel
object”, and reported that, “The 193-member world body
adopted the resolution by a vote of 169-2, with Ukraine
and Hungary abstaining. It was a strong show of unity
by the UN’s most representative body, though many
countries had hoped for adoption by consensus.”
The AP further stated:
It calls on governments and international financial institutions
“to provide more liquidity in the financial system, especially
in all developing countries.” It supports recovery plans that
“drive transformative change towards more inclusive and
just societies, including by empowering and engaging all
women and girls.”
And it urges UN member nations “to adopt a climate- and
environment-responsive approach to COVID-19 recovery
efforts”, including by aligning investments and domestic
policies with the UN goals & the 2015 Paris agreement
to combat climate change. …
By a vote of 132-3, the assembly amended the resolution to
urge all countries “to refrain from promulgating and applying
any unilateral economic, financial or trade measures not in
accordance with international law and the Charter of the
United Nations that impedes the full achievement of
economic and social development, particularly in
developing countries.”
The United States was then overwhelmingly defeated in
attempts to remove 2 paragraphs from the resolution,
one referring to women’s rights to “sexual and
reproductive health” --- and the other --- to
“promoting global sustainable transport.”
In addition to arguing against the language on sanctions,
the United States opposed all references to the World
Health Organization, which the US administration had
stopped funding, accusing the UN agency of failing
to do enough to stop the virus from spreading
when it first surfaced in China.
Nowhere in the AP’s article was any mention made that
in the “vote of 169-2,” the two nations which had voted
against the Resolution were the US and Israel, but only
that there had been “objections from the United States
and Israel,” regarding attachment, to the Resolution, of
the Amendment that added the anti-sanctions provision
to it. This omission was not an error. It is a type of
omission that is common in propaganda. America
was more isolated than that ‘news’-report
made clear.
This vote was about only a “Resolution,” a statement of
the various nations’ values, to work toward, not about
any nation’s policy, but the U.S. and Israel don’t share
those goals — not even rhetorically. This opposition
to that Resolution’s goals, was truly exceptional.
In particular, nothing is more abhorrent to the US regime
--- than to stop or impede its sanctions. These sanctions
include, for example, punishments against any company
or government that will, in any way, assist in Russia’s 96%
completed NordStream 2 natural gas pipeline to Germany,
for the EU to buy Russia’s pipelined natural gas instead of
America’s fracked, canned, shipped, natural gas. The U.S.
regime insists that EU nations buy the far costlier trans-
Atlantic-shipped fracked US liquefied natural gas (LNG).
That insistence upon the EU’s wasting money, in order to
prop-up America’s fracking industry, is, indeed, exceptional,
because European nations haven’t customarily been treated
as being mere colonies of other powers. America is treating
purchasers from, or cooperators with, that competitor (Russia),
as being its enemies. The way the U.S. Representative stated
this (after a lengthy diatribe which blamed China for Covid-19
and said that the U.S. had quit the World Health Organization
because WHO lacked “independence from the Chinese
Communist Party”) was: “Economic sanctions are a
legitimate means to achieve foreign policy, security,
and other national and international objectives, and
the United States is not alone in that view or in that
practice.” (That exact same sentence had, earlier,
been stated by the US regarding a different matter,
on 18 November 2019.) Actually, the U.S. regime is
very “alone” on it. Furthermore, the other part was
also a lie: the U.S. regime asserts that coercing
corporations and countries to not buy from the
lowest-cost supplier, is within its sovereign
right to do.
However, as Professor Alfred de Zayas, who until recently was
the UN’s top expert on this topic, explained in depth on 27th
June 2019, that assertion is blatantly false, on many clear
grounds concerning international law. It is a blatant lie, no
matter how many times the U.S. regime asserts it (and
asserts that the US regime isn’t “alone” in asserting it).
Even back when Barack Obama (the man who repeatedly
claimed that “The United States is and remains, the one
indispensable nation”) was America’s President, the US
was exceptional at the United Nations. For example, on
24th November 2014, I headlined “U.S. Among Only 3
Countries Officially Backing Nazism & Holocaust-
Denial”, and reported that - “In a UN vote, on
November 21st, only 3 countries - the US, Ukraine, and Canada — voted against a resolution to condemn racist fascism,
or nazism, and to condemn denial of Germany’s World War II Holocaust against, primarily, Jews.''
This measure passed the General Assembly, on a vote of 115
in favour, 3 against, & 55 abstentions (the abstentions were
in order not to offend U.S. President Obama, who was
opposed to the resolution).” Then, on 21 June 2015,
I headlined “America’s UN Ambassador Continues
Standing Up for Nazis” and noted that, again,
Obama’s UN Ambassador, Samantha Power,
had stood up for nazism; she had just
delivered an address -- in Ukraine --
rallying that country’s supporters
of nazism to war against Russia.
Then, on 21 November 2017, I headlined “Trump
Continues Obama’s Support of Nazism”, and
reported that:
On November 16th, US President Donald Trump, acting
through an agent of his agent, UN Ambassador Nikki
Haley, voted at the UN against a resolution that
condemns bigotry, and especially condemns
nazism & all forms of racism. He thus, yet
again, continues in the tradition from his
predecessors, Presidents Obama, and
Bush, each year, placing this nation in
the company of only one or two U.S.
allies throughout the world who join
with the US in refusing to commit to
opposing and doing everything to
reduce, not just political Nazism
(which, of course, is past), but
ideological nazism, racist
fascism - institutionalized
bigotry (which, sadly, is
not past).
But, be that as it may, the U.S. is also exceptional in
many other ways. I listed some of those on July 13th.
There are two main reasons why the U.S. regime is able
to coerce other nations to not violate its will. One is that
although publicly available reports allege it spends
approximately 37% of the entire world’s military
expenditures, the U.S. regime actually - spends
around 50% of the entire world’s military costs,
and therefore, it possesses an extraordinary
physical capacity to impose its will, if and
when merely economically blockading an
‘enemy’ country (via sanctions) fails to do the job of getting it to comply.
And the other main reason is that, since the US government
is at least as corrupt as the average “third-world” country is,
but is instead one of the world’s richest countries, arranging
pay-offs to other world leaders, in order to obtain their
cooperation, is easily affordable... (These payoffs are
being paid by all US.taxpayers, not by only America’s
billionaires, who reap all of the profits from the
empire that is imposed.)
American exceptionalism is real. It’s not the type of
exceptionalism that the regime’s propaganda claims
to be the case, but, nonetheless, it is real.
(Strategic Culture Foundation)
Please watch the video above... We have never existed in such peril, and yet almost no-one is able to act.
Nuclear words: Putin's FINAL warning:
(People DO need reminding -- unless US, UK and French policy changes, and stops being so 'exceptional' -- that is, outside the UN legal Charter and thus, criminal --- there will be a reaping.)
BREAKING: Russia's State TV Advising Russian Citizens on how to survive a World War ! WAKE UP NOW - AND STOP THE WAR ON CHINA/RUSSIA !
The Doomsday clock of the Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists website now has the final singular moment that will bring civilization to final nuclear annihilation, at 90 seconds to midnight.
This is the closest it has ever been. Scott Ritter says it should be 2 seconds
President Assad drives to E. Goutha - in a Honda!
Syrians support Assad, but BBC won't report it, British baroness tells RT after fact-finding trip April 24th, at 4:36pm
Most Syrians support their president and military, but the BBC presents Britons with a different, one-sided story, a British baroness and member of the House of Lords told RT, after returning from a trip to the war-torn country.
Caroline Cox, a baroness and Life Peer in the House of Lords, recently returned from a tour of several Syrian cities, during which she spoke with a "wide range of people," including government officials, opposition leaders, artists, writers, intellectuals and ordinary Syrians walking in the park.
According to Baroness Cox, despite claims from western governments and media outlets, the vast majority of Syrians are thankful to President Bashar Assad and the Syrian and Russian militaries for fighting Islamic State (IS, formerly ISIL) and jihadist groups.
The Syrian people "are very grateful to the Syrian Army, to Assad and, I may say, for Russian help in getting rid of the terrorists. They are the perpetrators of the most appalling atrocities and killings."
However, British media like the BBC have done a poor job of accurately conveying this public attitude, Baroness Cox told RT.
"People are very keen to hear the point of view from people inside Syria. It's widely felt and widely reported, that BBC reporting is very biased and very one-sided, and so they really want a bigger picture."
She also dismissed accusations that her trip to Syria was in any way inappropriate or was somehow staged for propaganda purposes.
The baroness explained how she spoke freely with random people she met in the park, "something that couldn't have been 'arranged' by the government."
"I talked to two delightful Muslim ladies, in one of the parks in Aleppo, and that wasn't pre-arranged, and I asked them what they felt about the situation, and what they said was entirely consistent with what we'd hear in the formal meetings," she said.
According to Cox, her message to the British people – and to the entire world – is very simple: "Please, may we leave the Syrian people the freedom to decide their own future."
Why Can’t US Wage War on Syria? by Mohammad Salami April 12th, 2018, at 3:50pm
Since the beginning of the crisis in Syria in 2011, the United States of America has been supporting the terrorist groups to fight the Syrian army, government and people, in order to destroy the entire country and impose partition across its territories.
Syria, which functions as the centre of the axis of resistance in the region, has been facing heavy international pressures to change its strategic political position in the area. After facing heavy political & diplomatic pressures, Syria had to confront a ferocious takfiri war & intermittent Israeli air raids on various targets in the country. Finally, the manager and the leader of the international wars on Syria and the whole axis of resistance, the U.S., decided to directly interfere in the ongoing battle in Syria.
Playing the same ‘chemical game’ which covered up the US war on Iraq in 2003, President Donald Trump decided, on behalf of the whole world, to strike Syria due to what he claimed were “chemical attacks” launched by the Syrian government troops in Eastern Gouta.
Regardless of the unfounded chemical allegations, the US administration faces a number of obstacles, which block its military aspirations in Syria & the entire Middle East.
First, the US military bases in the Middle East will be under direct intensive attacks from the opposing forces. Second, the allied Arab regimes would face unstable conditions in case a largescale war erupted in the region. Third, the Zionist entity would pay the heaviest price for any American adventure against Syria and the axis of resistance.
Considering the key obstacles mentioned above, as well as many others, the US administration finds itself unable to deal any blow to Syria in the context of a major war, as the consequences would be destructive with respect to the US strategic interests in the Middle East.
In case the United States is mulling limited air raids on certain targets in Syria, such actions have not proved to be fruitful and game changing. In April, 2017, the US warplanes struck Shoairat military airport in Homs in Syria, yet the blow failed to achieve any political or field result.
In politics, surprises are always expected; however, the available political and military conditions do not allow the United States to take any reckless measure against Syria and the whole region.
World Will Not Survive the US' Neocons' Doctrine of US World Hegemony - Paul Graig Roberts Wednesday, February 7th, 2018
"The government of the United States is clearly in demonic hands. We are overflowing with proof", writes American well known analytist and ex- official Paul Graig Roberts in his website.
Take today (2-2-18) for example. A report from the House Intelligence Committee was released that is proof that the Federal Bureau of Investigation, the Department of Justice --- and the Democrat National Committee, are now in a conspiracy against American democracy and the President of the United States, with the full support of the presstitute media.
As if that is not enough, also released today, is the Pentagon’s new Nuclear Posture Review. A nuclear posture review specifies a country’s attitude to nuclear weapons and their use. In past posture reviews, nuclear weapons were regarded as unusable except in retaliation for a nuclear attack. The assumption was that no one would use them. There was always the chance that false warnings of incoming ICBMs would result in a nuclear button being pushed - setting off Armageddon.
There were many false warnings during the Cold War
President Ronald Reagan, was very concerned about a false warning, ending in mass death & destruction.
This is why his principal goal was to end the Cold War, which he succeeded in doing. It did not take successor governments long, to resurrect the Cold War.
The new US nuclear posture is a reckless, irresponsible, and destabilizing departure from the previous attitude toward nuclear weapons. The use of even a small part of the existing arsenal of the United States would be sufficient to destroy life on earth. Yet, the posture review calls for more weapons, speaks of nuclear weapons as “usable,” and justifies their use in First Strikes, even against countries that do not have nuclear weapons.
This is an insane escalation. It tells every country that the US government, believes in the first use of nuclear weapons against any & every country. Nuclear powers such as Russia & China must see this to be a massive increase in the threat level from the US.
Those responsible for this document should be committed to insane aslyums, not left in policy positions where they can put it into action.
The neoconservatives are a small group of conspirators. Most neoconservatives are Jews allied with Israel. Some are dual-citizens. They created an ideology of US world hegemony, specifying that the chief goal of US foreign policy, is to prevent the rise of any other power that could serve as a constraint on US unilateralism.
As neoconservatives control US foreign policy, this explains US hostility toward Russia and China and also the neo-conservatives’ use of the US military to remove governments in the Middle East, seen by Israel as obstacles to Israeli expansion. For two decades --- the US has been fighting wars for Israel in the Middle East. This fact proves the power and influence of the insane neo- conservatives. It is certain, that people as insane as the neoconservatives, would launch a nuclear attack on Russiaand China.
The Russian and Chinese governments seem to be completely unaware of the threat that the neo- conservatives pose to them. I have never experienced in interviews with Russians and Chinese, any awareness of the neo- conservative ideology. Possibly, it is too insane for them to grasp.
Ideologues such as the neoconservatives are not fact-based
They are chasing their dream of world hegemony. Russia & China are in the way of this hegemony. Having learned the limits of conventional military power—after 20 years the US “superpower” has been unable to defeat a few thousand lightly armed Taliban in Afghanistan—the neo-conservatives know: conventional invasions of Russia or China, would lead to the total defeat of US forces.
Therefore, the neoconservatives have elevated nuclear weapons to a First Strike, usable, arsenal that in the neoconservative dream of world hegemony can be used to destroy Russia and China.
Ideologues who divorce themselves from the facts create a virtual world for themselves. Their belief in their ideology blinds them to the risks for them- selves and others that they impose on the world.
Thanks to the American liberal/progressive/left, the entirety of the world is faced with a far more likely nuclear demise than ever threatened us during the Cold War with the Soviet Union.
By its collaboration with the military/security complex & the corrupt Hillary DNC, the liberal/progressive/left has forever discredited itself. It is now seen by every thinking person worldwide as an insane propaganda ministry --- for the neoconservatives’ plan to use nuclear weapons to eliminate constraints on US unilateralism.
The liberal/progressive/left has endorsed “hegemony or death.”
They will get death. For all of us.
(Source - DONi News Agency)
According to: PaulGraigRoberts.org
_______________________________________ Syrian Girl - The Truth About The Kurds In Syria
Full Text: Official Declaration of the Malorossiyan Federation
Zakharchenko announces a new federal state, Malorossiya, (means ''Little Russia'') as the legal successor of Ukraine. DONi News Agency
On 18.7.2017 the Head of the Donetsk People's Republic, Alexander Zakharchenko, declared the creation of a new federal state, Malorossiya, which will become the legal successor of 'Ukraine'. The new state formation, will consist of 19 regions of the former Ukraine with the capital in Donetsk city. Kiev remains a historical and cultural centre, without the status of capital city.
Here is the full English translation of the declaration:
Political Declaration
The project of the state of "Ukraine", formulated 150 years ago and implemented in different versions during the 20th century, has reached its logical conclusion --- and led to the country's disintegration, civil war and the death of tens of thousands of people, including children, women, and elderly people.
And this process is irreversible. An attempt to turn the story back will result in "balkanization" of the conflict, expansion of chaos, escalation of civil war and even bigger numbers of casualties.
To stop the civil war and avoid new victims, we representatives of the majority of the regions of former "Ukraine" assembled in Donetsk on July 18, 2017, discussed the current situation and came to the following conclusions:
- the state of "Ukraine" has revealed itself as a failed state and demonstrated its being incapable of granting its inhabitants a peaceful and prosperous present and future;
- the current authorities – elected in Kiev, after the coup d'etat, against the backdrop of political terror and the absence of elections in the Crimea and Donbass, are illegitimate;
- the state of "Ukraine" is on the brink of economic catastrophe and depopulation;
- an ultranationalist coup is brewing in Kiev, as a result of which outright neo-Nazis will come to power insteadof "Banderites with a European face";
- the Ukrainian nationalistic project (the Galician one) has discredited itself, by the shedding of civilians' blood in the country;
- the ideology of "Ukrainism" has proved to be misanthropic, mixed with xenophobia (Russophobia, anti-Semitism, Polonophobia) and neo-Nazism (the ideology of national exclusivity and superiority);
- resulting from historical development and due to the Maidan, the word "Ukraine" is forever associated with the names of the Nazi accomplices, Bandera and Shukhevich, with the tragedies of the Baby Yar, the Volyn massacre & Khatyn, and, nowadays, with the mass murder of people on the Maidan, in the Trade Unions' House in Odessa, and Genocide of the Donbass people.
On the basis of the above, we believe that the state of "Ukraine", in the form it was established, after the collapse of the USSR, is UNSERVICEABLE.
We, representatives of the regions of the former "Ukraine", propose to re-establish the state and to proclaim the state of MALOROSSIYA, under an historical background, out of the former "Ukraine". In this case, it is of fundamental importance to rename the country, since "Ukraine" as a state, is guilty of war crimes, mass terror and the genocide of its own people.
In turn, the new name of the country, based on historical traditions, will enable us to reunify those pieces of the former "Ukraine" that seemed to have parted ways forever, including because of participation in the civil war, on different sides of the front line.
We must turn the page of our people's history, which is flooded with the blood of our brothers and sisters.
Malorossiya is an INDEPENDENT, SOVEREIGN state, with a new name, a new flag, a new constitution, a new state structure, new principles of social and economic development, and new historical prospectives.
But this is NOT A REVOLUTION ! This is a return to history. This is a novelty that restores, not destroys.
In view of the economic plight of the country, the chaos & disintegration potential, and regarding the possibility of launching a "war of all against all", we consider it necessary to declare a state of emergency for the transition period – up to 3 years. During this time, the process of adoption of the new Constitution and the establishment of the rule of law, should be completed.
Under a state of emergency, a ban on the activities of political parties and foreign funds is to be introduced, & penalties for criminal offenses, especially against the person, are to be increased. The fight against corruption will be toughened, as well as the penalties for it.The shadow arms market is to be eliminated, including by registering weapons in accordance with the new law.
In the same period an investigation is to be carried out, with the involvement of foreign specialists –- from Russia, Belarus & the European Union –- into the crimes committed by the Maidan Kiev regime: the murders on the Maidan, the murder of Odessa citizens in the Trade Unions' House on May 2nd, 2014, and the war crimes in Donbass, in the so-called ATO.
In the same period, the People's Tribunal is to be prepared to charge the state criminals who have led the country into disintegration and civil war: V.F. Yanukovich (with a request to Russia for his extradition), P.A. Poroshenko and his clique: Turchinov, Yatsenyuk, Kolomoisky, Paruby, Nalivaichenko and others.
We are sure that, having recovered from the criminal neo-Nazi ideology of "Ukrainism", we will be able to build a new society on the basis of friendship and mutual assistance -- but not hatred and envy. The creative genius of our people will manage to bring Malorossiya to the forefront of global civilization and play a role in history. The role of Good, and Truth.
Official translation by the DONi Donbass News Agency, 07/18/2017
(Source - Russia Insider)
_____________________________________________
Nato – A Dangerous Alliance May 24th
As Nato ends its summit in Brussels, Rae Street explains why the military alliance remains a threat to world peace
When the Warsaw Pact ended, after the collapse of communism, some optimists might have expected Nato to be broken up too. After all, the Labour Party in Britain had been opposed to Nato in the mid-1980s. But that was not to be. The US, which had always dominated Nato, quickly began to reinvent Nato and furthermore, to expand it.
Following the end of the Warsaw Pact many central and east European governments wanted to join Nato. This, of course, was music to the ears of the US military manufacturers. Indeed, the chair of the expand Nato committee, Bruce Jackson, was technical director of Lockheed Martin, the largest military manufacturer in the world. So, for the new Nato members because of the policy on “interoperability,” that is Nato personnel being able to use the same military equipment, it was out with the old Soviet military hard- ware and in with sales of, for example, Lockheed’s military aircraft ,costing millions of dollars.
This continues to this day in countries which can ill afford it, with struggling economies. The latter includes Greece. Think of the situation in Greece today.
Expanding Nato up to the borders with Russia, was a provocative policy. The dangers were pointed out but the military industrial complex and the “hawks” in the West, took no notice.
To this day, this helps President Vladimir Putin: more and more of the Russian people believe that “the West” is against them.
Decades later, we read: “British troops have arrived in Estonia, as part of a major Nato mission in the Baltic states, to deter Russian aggression.”
From the start, Nato has always held a nuclear armed policy. It continues to claim that nuclear weapons “preserve peace.” Manifestly, nuclear weapons do not deter conflict.
Governments, including Britain’s, now analyse the main threats to security as cyber warfare and terrorism. Remember September 11th 2001, when New York was attacked by terrorists in planes, brandishing knives?
The US then had and still has, 13 nuclear armed Trident submarines, of which several will be roaming the seas fully operational. Britain has four, with one constantly on alert at sea.
Were these any use in the madman’s attack on Westminster, or in any terrorist attacks?
Trident is “integrated” into Nato. Even worse, Nato still has a policy of “first use of nuclear weapons.”
When the then minister of defence, Geoff Hoon, was asked in Parliament why Britain has a policy of “first use,” he replied: “Because of our obligations to Nato.”
Under the direction of the US administration, with its policy of global domination, Nato has established a string of nuclear-armed bases across Europe, in Belgium, Germany, Italy, the Netherlands and Turkey, at Incirlik.
The latter is now causing deep problems as relations between President Recep Tayyip Erdogan and the US, become more and more fractious.
There is now a real problem for Nato, as Erdogan is a repressive dictator — how can Turkey remain in Nato?
Nato states are supposed to uphold principles of human rights and democracy, notably lacking in Turkey today.
The nuclear-armed bases come under Nato’s “nuclear sharing policy” — in effect a violation of the nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty.
Nato continues to expand. The policy of not acting “out of area” was dropped long ago. “North Atlantic” simply means, a domination of policies by the US.
Nato claims in its “strategic concept” that “the promotion of Euro-Atlantic security is best assured through a wide network of partner relationships with countries and organisations around the globe.”
In 1994 Nato established the Partnerships for Peace across Europe, extending as far as Uzbekistan.
Nato surrounds Russia from the west and east. These Partnerships for Peace (note the language again) now include 22 states, including “neutral” Ireland.
Then there is the ''Mediterranean Dialogue,'' with ''arrangements'' with countries in the Middle East. Few people realise that Nato carries out military exercises with Israel.
Nato has also established bilateral relations — named individual partnerships — with Afghanistan, Australia, Iraq, Japan, the Republic of Korea, Mongolia, New Zealand and Pakistan.
In this part of the globe, where Nato carried out a military exercise in 2014 with Japan, named Ocean Shield, they are surrounding and menacing China, as the enemy.
Then there was the statement by Nato that “co-operation between Nato and the United Nations continues to make a substantial contribution to security in operations round the world.
“The alliance aims to deepen political dialogue and practical co-operation with the UN, as set out in the Nato/UN declaration, signed in 2008.”
This seems like Nato bidding to be the UN's military arm.
This hardly accords with the UN Charter. It was the Organisation for Security & Co-operation in Europe, set up under Chapter 8, of the UN Charter, to prevent and resolve conflict by non-military means and to promote co-operation in humanitarian and other fields.
The 54 member states stretch from Iceland to Kyrgyzstan and include Russia. Alas, how many times do you read of their work in the press, compared with the times you hear about Nato?
Nato is sold to us as a peace-making body. After all, the US is home to the finest PR companies in the world.
To summarise, Nato is pursuing yet more militarism and war:
- All Nato states are required to increase their military budgets to 2 per cent of GDP. That means stealing more money from social needs. Readers of the Morning Star know those all too well: the NHS, education, adult social services; the list is endless.
- Nato member states will have to spend 20 per cent of defence budgets on military equipment: warships, war planes, drones, bombs. By fuelling the arms race, Nato makes a mockery of moves for conflict resolution.
- Nato and its member states multiply interventions outside their territory and increase their presence through world- wide partnerships and “coalitions of the willing.”
- Nato extends its nuclear policies as a supreme “guarantee for the allies’ security,” notwithstanding that the majority of countries in the world are negotiating a treaty to ban nuclear weapons. In the meantime, nuclear weapons in Europe — under the guise of Nato — and elsewhere, are being modernised at a cost of many tens of billions of dollars and pounds. Think of Trident at a cost of £205 billion.
The Nato summit will be held and activists will beholding a “counter-summit” with protesters organising workshops and a demonstration.
CND activists will be there from the UK, but -- we also need people to raise the issues with their MPs, write letters to the press and raise awareness on social media.
Let’s put pressure on the government to invest in social welfare, not Nato, not war.
(Source - Morning Star)
Legendary memorial at Saur-Tomb ''restored by May 2017''
DPR authorities have finished restoring the Saur-Tomb by May 2017. It was announced by the Building Minister, Sergey Naymets.
‘Saur Tomb has been being restored since November, and we planned to finish this by May 2017’, the Minister said.
He said "many people contributed to this project of restoration of the memorial damaged by shelling," Naumets noted.
____________________________
Cool Russia!
[Eng Subs] Children of Donbass, "Toys for Poroshenko" Music Video by Artem Grishanov
POWERFUL - PUT THIS ON HEADPHONES. I guarantee you will cry - and if you don't - please seek psychiatric help.
In 2017 in the Donbass - give the children Peace!
Ethnic Ruthenes of sub-Carpathian Ukraine demand autonomy
Activists of a Slavic ethnic group known as Ruthenes -- or Rusyns -- who reside in the Trans-Carpathian (sub-Carpathian) region of Ukraine, have turned to President Pyotr Poroshenko with a demand:
recognize the results of 1991's regional referendum --- when 78% of the region's residents, voted in favor of granting it the status of a self-governing region.
"We have two main demands - to recognize the Rhuthenes as an ethnos and to acknowledge the regional referendum of 1991, where 78% sub-Carpathians voted for the region being a self-governed territory within Ukraine," Vesti quoted Ivan Palinkash, the leader of the Ruthene movement & a member of the People’s Council's presidium of Sub-Carpathian Ruthenes.
Natalya Magalina, a deputy of Uzhgorod district council, told the meeting of leaders of Ruthene ethnic organizations it is important to maintain the Ruthene language by establishing minimal norms for broadcasting in the native tongue, over the state regional TV Channel Tisa-1.
This isn't the first time that the Ruthenes of the sub- Carpathian area have asked the Kiev government to recognize the outcome of the referendum held 25 years ago. The Coordination Council of Ruthene Organizations of the Trans-Carpathian Region turned to the central authorities with the same requirement, the previous time, in the summer of 2015.
It was also in the summer of 2015 that the activists of Ruthene organizations adopted an appeal to the Council of Europe, the European Commission, the Organization for Security & Cooperation in Europe & the UN, as well as to the parliaments of Hungary, the Czech Republic, & Slovakia, to wield pressure on President Poroshenko and force the Ukrainian government towards accepting the result of their referendum.
The Ruthenes are an indigenous sub-Carpathian people. Ukrainian authorities do not consider them to be a separate ethnos, and continue calling them Ukrainians, although the UN has issued recommendations more than once, to recognize their status as a separate ethnos.
More than that, Kiev accuses the leaders of Ruthene organizations of making appeals for encroachments on the territorial integrity of the country.
(source - TASS)
!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Zionist lobby preventing West from criticizing Israel: Analyst Fri Dec 16, 2016
The European Union has censured the Israeli regime for destroying Palestinian shelters and structures in the occupied territories. According to a statement by the European bloc, the Tel Aviv regime has demolished 866 structures so far in 2016 in Area C of the West Bank, which is under full Israeli military control.
Anthony Hall, editor-in-chief of the American Herald Tribune from Alberta, says that the European states have been under the influence of the Zionist lobby to go along with Israeli interests - and thus refuse to slam crimes against the Palestinian people.
“Every government within the EU has a very strong Israeli lobby, and this is one of the dilemmas that the Western people are facing,”Hall explained.
“Not only the governing parties but the opposition parties as well, are constraining discussion and discourse within a very narrow range, that puts Israeli priorities at the top of the list in all our Western countries,”he added.
The professor also called on Western citizens to“intervene directly and make contact with the Palestinian people, directly.”
“We, as the citizens in the EU, citizens in Canada, & citizens in the US, have to find ways to bypass the constraints of our governments & the biases and power of this lobby over our governments,” he noted.
Hall criticized the EU for its forensic accounting of homes demolished in Palestine.
“This type of numerical accounting fails to really describe the nature of this destruction of homes in its broader context ------ where thousands of Palestinian people are in dungeons and being tortured in Israeli incarceration facilities,” he said.
“The reality: that the world is letting this happen is very discouraging,” he added.
Hall warned that the prospect of a Palestinian state is no longer viable, given the emphasis on building up settlements, and destroying the structures of the indigenous people of Palestine.
"This goes beyond apartheid,” he said.
The Israeli policy of demolishing houses in the West Bank to build illegal settler units has affected 5,704 Palestinians, of whom, 1,221 have been rendered homeless, including 586 children.
(source - PressTv)
_____________________________________
UN Adopts"Paper Tiger" Resolution, on Israel's Withdrawal from the Syrian Golan
Fahwad Al-Khadoumi -The UN General Assembly adopted yet another resolution demanding that Israel withdraw from the occupied Syrian Golan Heights, in line with a resolution of June 4, 1967.
However, UN General Assembly resolutions are non-binding and no more than a paper tiger, with- out a unanimous decision by the permanent UN Security Council members, to enforce them; A highly unlikely prospect.
In its latest resolution, the UN General Assembly again condemned Israel's non-compliance with UN Security Council Resolution 497 (1981). The General Assembly reiterated that Israel's decision from December 14th, 1981, to impose Israeli laws, administration & custody on the occupied Syrian Golan Heights, is null and void -- and has no legality at all.
The latest UNGA resolution was adopted by an overwhelming majority of UN member States. The resolution reaffirmed the illegality of acquiring territories through the use of military force. The General Assembly also repeated that Israel's continued occupation & enforcement of Israeli law & administration violates international law, the UN Charter, & the Geneva Convention's principles on the protection of civilians during war.
During the UNGA session, a number of states condemned the Israeli practices in occupied Syrian Golan, calling on Israel to withdraw from Golan, in line with June 4th, 1967.
37 states proposed the now adopted draft resolution. However, UNGA resolutions are non-binding and no more than a paper tiger, unless permanent Security Council members are willing to put their money where their mouth was, when they adopted UNSC Resolution 497 (1981) - decades ago.
Moreover, none of the permanent UNSC members - China, France, Russia, the UK and the US - took any tangible steps when the now former Israeli Foreign Minister, Avigdor Lieberman, defiantly declared that "Israel and the Golan are part and parcel" and that "the international community should get used to facing the fact that Israel will permanently annex the Syrian territory".
Most favourite scapegoat
The favorite scapegoat among permanent UNSC members, with regard to supporting Israel and neglecting Israel's illegal occupation of Golan is the US. However, Russia is in no way more actively pursuing Israel's adherence with UNSC Resolution 497 (1981) than any other of the self-anointed permanent UNSC members. In April 2016, Russia and Russian President Vladimir Putin, were ominously silent about the Golan when Israeli PM, Benjamin Netanyahu, visited Moscow.
Russia failed to respond to what Netanyahu had declared "a red line" - occupation of the Golan.
A brief review of recent history pertaining to the Israeli occupation, international affairs & Israel's use of the Golan to wage war on Syria, suffices to show that the UN System has failed, utterly, and that it is perverted to the point that many analysts call for abolishing the UN altogether.
In June 2013 an Austrian UN Disengagement & Observer Force (UNDOF) officer told the press that Israel is running a joint operations room with the insurgents in Syria in the Golan.The UNSC failed to respond and more importantly, failed to take action. In July 2013, the Syrian permanent representative to the UN in Geneva, Dr. Fayssal al-Hamwi, noted how Israel, since it occupied the Syrian Golan Heights in 1967, has displaced about half a million of the Golan´s original inhabitants.
Also in Feb. 2014, Israeli PM Benjamin Netanyahu preempted a public relations quagmire by visiting a field hospital for "Syrian Freedom Fighters" in the Golan to show how much Israel cares and does, on the humanitarian front. It turned out that the "Freedom Fighters" belonged to the Syrian Al-Qaeda franchise, Jabhat al-Nusra.
In March 2014, Israel launched one of many military attacks against Syrian military and security forces, from the Golan, while the UNSC and most media were "silent".
In April 2014 The Director of Israel's Military Intelligence, Brigadier General Aviv Kochavi, a protegé of the now deceased Ariel Sharon, was appointed to head the Israeli Defense Forces Northern Command.
NSNBC international editor-in-chief, Christof Lehmann, reported that the appointment of Kochavi, indicated that Israel was planning large-scale military operations via the Golan in the near future and the widening of the Syria war. Lehmann was right on the money.
In May 2014 Israel denied Syrians in Golan the right to participate in Syrian elections. The UN was "silent". In mid-April 2016, ahead of talks with Russian President Vladimir Putin, Israeli PM Benjamin Netanyahu affirmed that Israel would hold on to the Golan.
A UNDOF withdrawal has left a 12-16 km wide corridor uncontrolled by the UNDOF... In 2013, it transpired that Israel was giving support to Jabhat al-Nusrah, such as a joint intelligence and military operations room in the Israeli occupied Golan, plus logistical support, weapons, field hospitals, and direct combat support.
In September 2014, Israeli machinations, resulted in the displacement of UNDOF troops from a 12-16 kilometer-wide corridor in the disengagement zone in the Golan by Jabhat Al-Nusra.. The corridor has since been used to supply Al-Nusra and the other terrorists and to launch attacks against Syria.
All permanent UNSC members with the exception of Russia were "silent". Russian diplomats tentatively spoke out against terminating the peace keeping mission in the Golan. The UNSC failed to act.
In 2015 it came out that Israel planned a major hydrocarbon extraction project in the Golan. Partners in crime include Genier Energy.
On the board of directors? Dick Cheney, James Woolsey, Bill Richardson, Jacob Lord Rothschild, Rupert Murdoch, Larry Summers and Michael Steinhardt, among others. Other players involved include the Israeli subsidiary, Afek Oil and Gas, American Shale, French Total and BP. Thus, there exists a broad and powerful nexus of US, British, French and Israeli interests: at the forefront of pushing for the break-up of Syria and control of what's believed to be potentially vast untapped oil and gas resources in the country.
On April 20th, 2016, NSNBC international editor- in-chief Christof Lehmann, said Netanyahu's "Red Line" would be a litmus test for Russia, as a permanent UNSC member. On April 21st, after talks between Netanyahu and Putin in Moscow, it could be concluded that Russia failed -- spectacularly.
In September 2016, Israel started a wave of home demolitions in the Golan. The UNSC was "silent".
In October 2016, Israel announced plans to build 1,600 settlement units in the Golan, & none of the permanent UNSC members took any action.
So much for the latest UN General Assembly paper tiger.
_________________________________
The UK Labour MPs who didn’t back the Yemen vote have blood on their hands by David Wearing
Presenting the motion in the Commons, Thornberry was subjected to a series of ill-judged interruptions by Labour MPs, such as Kevan Jones, Toby Perkins and John Woodcock. Indeed, Thornberry received more vocal support in the chamber from the SNP group than from her own supposed comrades.
According to subsequent reports, some Labour members even tried to work with their Tory counterparts, in order to defeat their own party’s motion.
Woodcock, a former 'Progress' Chair, claimed that British support is “precisely focused on training the Saudis” to improve their targeting - so as to “create fewer civilian casualties” - parroting the official government line. The idea that the Saudis’ “widespread & systematic” attacks on civilian targets are just a series of well- meaning errors, is one that, to put it as gently as possible, lacks credibility.
And if decades of training provided by the British to the Saudi pilots hasn’t prevented these supposed errors by now --- it seems rather unlikely that it will in the near future.
In any case, this misrepresents the true nature of the UK's role. When the intervention began, the foreign secretary Philip Hammond, vowed to “support the Saudis in every practical way short of engaging in combat”, including “spare parts, maintenance, technical advice, resupply” and “logistical support”. The reality is that the Saudi Air Force, roughly half UK-supplied and half US-supplied jets, could barely function, without this ongoing assistance from Washington and London.
If there is Yemeni blood on the hands of the Saudi-led coalition - then that blood is also on the hands of the coalition’s western backers, enablers and apologists.
The Saudis and their allies can only wage this war because the Anglo-American suppliers of their air forces are providing active, material support. And British and American politicians can only collude in these outrages, because the political cost on them, so far, has been low. However, it is in the gift of their constituents – you, the reader – to change that equation.
(source - The Guardian)
This could be defeated --- with a UNITED LABOUR PARTY !!!
But unfortunately, there are "entryist" MPs who, for decades, have been groomed by CIA cold war relic organisations -- like the Atlantic Council -- and are now trying to misdirect the Labour Party towards cuts, a militarised police, and a US war agenda... and their anti-peace MPs are hobbling Labour.
129 Labour MPs voted to stop support for Saudi Arabia’s campaign in Yemen. The vote was defeated by a majority of 90.
The motion called for ---- support to be withdrawn from the Saudi government until a United Nations investigation could determine whether the Saudi bombing had breached international law.
The motion didn't explicitly include a suspension of UK arms sales.
100+ Labour MPs didn't vote on the motion. If all of them had voted to support it, the government would have been defeated.
The following, are the Labour MPs who abstained, or weren't present to vote.
Adrian Bailey Andy Burnham Angela Eagle Angela Smith Ann Clwyd Ann Coffey Anna Turley Barry Sheerman Ben Bradshaw Bridgit Phillipson Caroline Flint Catherine McKinnell Chris Bryant Chris Elmore (Teller) Chris Evans Chris Leslie Clive Lewis (ill) Connor McGinn Dan Jarvis David Crausby David Lammy Diana Johnson Fiona MacTaggart Frank Field Gareth Thomas Gavin Shuker Geoffrey Robinson George Howarth Gerald Kaufman Gill Furniss Gisela Stuart Gloria De Piero Graeme Jones Graham Allen Graham Stringer Heidi Alexander Helen Jones Ian Austin Ian Murray Ivan Lewis Jamie Reed Jim Fitzpatrick Joan Ryan John Mann John Spellar John Woodcock Judith Cummins (Teller) Julie Elliott Kate Hoey Keith Vaz Kevan Jones Kevin Barron Liz Kendall Luciana Berger Lucy Powell Madeleine Moon Margaret Beckett Margaret Hodge Maria Eagle Mark Hendrick Mary Creagh Meg Hillier (Paired) Melanie Onn Michael Dugher Mike Gapes Natascha Engel Neil Coyle Nia Griffith Pat McFadden Paul Flynn Peter Kyle Phil Wilson Rachel Reeves Rob Flello Rob Marris Roberta Blackman-Woods Rosie Cooper Rushanara Ali Ruth Smeeth Shabana Mahmood Siobhain McDonagh Stephen Kinnock Susan Jones Toby Perkins Tom Blenkinsopp Tom Watson Tracy Brabin Tristram Hunt Vernon Coaker Wayne David Wes Streeting Yasmin Qureshi Yvonne Fovargue
___________________________________
‘How Can I Deselect My Labour MP?’ A Short Guideto Reselection and Democratic Accountability by Eric Sim, excellent free advice here:
Nicolas J S Davies is the author of Blood On Our Hands: the American Invasion and Destruction of Iraq. He also wrote the chapters on “Obama at War” in Grading the 44th President: a Report Card on Barack Obama’s First Term as a Progressive (Lol) Leader.
In the past weeks, Burundi and S. Africa have joined Namibia in declaring their intention to withdraw from the jurisdiction of the International Criminal Court (ICC). They are likely to be followed by a parade of other African countries, jeopardizing the future of an international court, which has prosecuted 39 officials from 8 African countries, but has failed to indict a single person who is not African.
Ironically, African countries were among the first to embrace the ICC, so it is a striking turnaround that they are now the first to give up on it.
But it is the United States that has played the leading role in preventing the ICC from fulfilling the universal mandate for which it was formed, to hold officials of all countries accountable for the worst crimes in the world: genocide; crimes against humanity; and war crimes - not least, international aggression, which the judges at Nuremberg defined as “the supreme international crime”, from which, all other war crimes follow.
As the ICC’s founding father, former Nuremberg prosecutor Benjamin Ferencz, lamented in 2011: “You don’t have to be a criminologist to realize that if you want to deter a crime, you must persuade potential criminals that, if they commit crimes, they will be hauled into court and be held accountable. It is the policy of the US to do just the opposite as far as the crime of aggression is concerned.
"Our government has gone to great pains - to be sure that no US citizen will be tried by any international criminal court, for the supreme crime of illegal war-making.”
The US has not only refused to accept the jurisdiction of the ICC over its own citizens. It's gone further, pressuring other countries to sign Bilateral Immunity Agreements (BIA), in which they renounce the right to refer US citizens to the ICC for war crimes committed on their territory.
The US has also threatened to cut off US aid to countries that refuse to sign them. The BIAs violate those countries’ own commitments under the ICC statute, and US pressure to sign them, has been rightly condemned: as an outrageous effort to ensure impunity for US war crimes.
Resistance to US Impunity
To the credit of our international neighbours, this US strategy has met with substantial resistance. The European Parliament overwhelmingly passed a resolution, stating that BIAs are incompatible with EU membership, and urging EU- member states and countries seeking EU membership not to sign them.
Fifty-four countries have publicly refused to sign BIAs, and 24 have accepted cut-offs of US aid as a consequence of their refusal. Of 102 countries that have signed a BIA, only 48 are members of the ICC in any case --- and only 15 of those countries are on record as having ratified the BIAs in their own parliaments.
Thirty-two other ICC members have apparently allowed BIAs to take effect without parliament- ary ratification, but this has been challenged by their own country’s legal experts in many cases.
The US campaign to undermine the ICC is part of a much broader effort by the US government to evade all forms of accountability under the laws that are supposed to govern international behaviour in the modern world ----- even as it continues to masquerade as a global champion of the rule of law.
The treaties US policy systematically violates today, were crafted by US statespersons and diplomats, working with foreign colleagues, to build a world where all people will enjoy some basic protections... from the worst atrocities, instead of being subject only to the law of the jungle or “might makes right.”
So current US policy is a cynical betrayal of the work and wisdom of past generations of US citizens, as well as of countless victims all over the world to whom we are effectively denying the protections of the UN Charter & Geneva Conventions, the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child, and many other multilateral treaties our country ignores, violates or refuses to ratify.
Avoiding jurisdiction in international courts is only one of the ways that the US evades international accountability for its criminal behaviour. Another involves an elaborate, well-disguised, public relations campaign that exploits the powerful position of US corporations in the world of commercial media.
Major Propaganda Funding
The US government spends a billion dollars per year on public relations or, more bluntly, propaganda, including $600 million from the Pentagon budget. The work of its PR teams and contractors is laundered by US news- papers --- and repeated and analyzed ad nauseam, by monolithic, flag-waving TV networks.
These profitable corporate operations monopolize the public airwaves in the US, and also use their financial clout, slick marketing, and the support of the US State Department to maintain a power- ful presence in foreign and international media markets.
Foreign media in allied countries provide further legitimacy and credibility to US talking-points and narratives as they echo around the world. Meanwhile, Hollywood fills cinema and TV screens across the world with an idealized, glamorized, inspirational version of the US that still mesmerizes many people.
This whole elaborate “information warfare” machine presents the US as a global leader for democracy, human rights and the rule of law, even as it systematically and catastroph- ically undermines those same principles. It enables our leaders to loudly, persuasively, demonize other countries and their leaders as dangerous violators of international law, even as the US and its allies commit far worse crimes.
Double Standards in Syria / Iraq
Today, for instance, the US & its allies are accusing Syria & Russia of war crimes in east Aleppo, even as the US’s own and allied forces launch a similar assault on Mosul. Both attacks are killing civilians & reducing much of a city to rubble; the rationale is the same, counterterrorism; & there are many more people in the line of fire in Mosul, than in east Aleppo.
But the US propaganda machine ensures that most US citizens see only one, in Mosul, as a legitimate counterterrorism operation (with Islamic State accused of using the civilians as “human shields”) and the other, in east Aleppo, as a massacre (with the presence of Al Qaeda’s Syrian affiliate, the former Nusra Front, virtually whited out of the West’s coverage, which focuses almost entirely on the children and makes no mention of “human shields”).
The phrase “aggressive war” is also a no-no in the Western media when the US government launches wars, across international borders. In the past 20 years, the US has violated the UN Charter to attack at least eight countries (Yugoslavia, Afghanistan, Iraq, Pakistan, Yemen, Somalia, Libya & Syria), and the resulting wars, have killed about two million people.
A complex whirlwind of conflict and chaos rages on in all the countries where the US and its allies have lit the flames of war since 2001, but our US leaders still debate new interventions and/or escalations as if we are the fire brigade not the arsonists. (By contrast, the US government and the Western media are quick to accuse Russia or other countries of “aggression” --- even in legally murky situations, such as after the US-backed coup in 2014, that ousted the elected president of Ukraine.)
Systematic violations of the Geneva Conventions are an integral part of US war-making. Most are shrouded in secrecy: the propaganda machine spins the atrocities that slip through into the public record, as a disconnected series of aberrations, accidents and “bad apples,” instead of as the result of illegal rules of engagement and unlawful orders from higher-ups.
The senior officers and civilian officials who are criminally responsible for these crimes in US & international law -- systematically abuse their powerful positions to subvert investigations, cover up their crimes, & avoid any accountability whatsoever.
Pinter’s Complaint
When UK playwright Harold Pinter was awarded the Nobel Prize for Literature in 2005, he bravely and brilliantly used his Nobel lecture to speak about the real role the US plays in the world, and how it whitewashes its crimes. Pinter recounted a meeting at the US Embassy in London in the 1980s in which a senior embassy official, Raymond Seitz, flatly denied US war crimes in Nicaragua ---- for which the US was in fact, convicted of aggression by the International Court of Justice (ICJ). Seitz went on to serve as Assistant Secretary of State, US Ambassador to the UK, and then Vice-Chair of Lehman Brothers.
As Pinter explained: “this ‘policy’ was by no means restricted to Central America. It was conducted throughout the world. It was never-ending. And it is as if it never happened.
“The United States supported - and in many cases engendered every rightwing military dictatorship in the world, after the end of the Second World War. I refer to:- Indonesia, Greece, Uruguay, Brazil, Paraguay, Haiti, Turkey, the Philippines, Guatemala, El Salvador, and, of course, Chile. The horror the US inflicted upon Chile in 1973 can never be purged, & can never be forgiven.
“Hundreds of thousands of deaths took place throughout these countries. Did they take place? & are they in all cases, attributable to US foreign policy? The answer is 'yes', they did take place, and are attributable to American foreign policy. But you wouldn’t know it.
“It never happened. Nothing ever happened. Even while it was happening it wasn’t happ- ening. It didn’t matter. It was of no interest. The crimes of the United States have been systematic, constant, vicious, remorseless, but very few people have actually talked about them. You have to hand it to the US. It has exercised a quite clinical manipulation of power, worldwide, while masquerading as a force for universal good. It’s a brilliant - even witty - highly successful, act of hypnosis.”
If, in 2016, the world seems to be more violent and chaotic than ever, it's not because the US lacks the will to use force or project power, as both major party candidates for President, & their military advisers appear to believe, but because our leaders have placed too much stock in the illegal threat and use of force, and have lost faith in the rule of law, any international cooperation and diplomacy.
After a century of commercial dominance, & 75 years of investing disproportionately in weapons, military forces & geopolitical schemes, perhaps it is understandable that US leaders have forgotten how to deal fairly and respectfully with our international neighbours. But it's no longer an option, to muddle along, leaving a trail of death, ruin and chaos in our wake, counting on an elaborate propaganda mach- ine, to minimize the blowback on our country and our lives.
Sooner, rather than later, US citizens & our leaders must knuckle down and master the very different attitudes & skills that we will need to become law-abiding global citizens in a peaceful, sustainable, multipolar world.
_________________________________________
Russia ends treaty limiting plutonium production in response to recent US escalation of hostility Fort Russ News - Topwar.ru - Lenta - News.Ru - translated by J. Arnoldski
TopWar: On October 3rd, Russian President Vladimir Putin signed a decree on suspending compliance with the agreement with the US on disposing weapons-grade plutonium. The main reason for this decision was pointed out as the “unfriendly attitude of the US towards Russia.”
Sources from the State Duma have reported that Russia is ready to resume the agreement, if the US cancels all the anti-Russian sanctions. Plus, Russia demands that the US reduce its military contingent in Europe, before Russia resumes compliance with the protocols. The State Duma’s statement reads:
“Acting according to the agreement and the protocols of the agreement can be resumed after the US eliminates the reasons which led to this radical change in circumstances: after the US reduces its military infrastructure and the number of its troop contingents deployed on the territory of the NATO countries having joined NATO after September 1st, 2000, down to the level at which they were on the day that the agreement and its protocols entered force.
"Since then NATO has grown to encompass 9 states of Eastern Europe. Just around the corner is NATO’s 10th state to be included since 2000 - Montenegro.”
In addition, Russia has demanded, as one of its conditions, that Washington cancel the so-call- ed Magnitsky Act.
We await a reaction from the US.
___________________________________________
Popov: Russia can and should withdraw from 1997 treaty with Ukraine By Eduard Popov for Fort Russ - translated by J. Arnoldski -
The other day, the disturbing news came from Lvov, the unofficial capital of Ukrainian Galicia, that the Lvov regional council has filed a lawsuit to forcibly evict the Pushkin Russian Cultural Centre. As the head of the regional council, V. Girnyak, said in his statement, organizations tied to the Anti-Terrorist Operation are preparing to transfer the building on Korolenko Street. The Lvov deputies hardly expect to earn more money from these “ATOers.” Rather, the eviction of Pushkin Russian Cultural Centre is explained by a different motive: once again, punishing anyone ideologically representative of an “enemy” Russian culture.
This centre’s building was leased to the Russian community of Lvov, in 1990. In 1999, the then mayor Vasiliy Kuybida, set the symbolic rent fee of 5 hryvnia (around $1 back then).
Let us quote one founding document signed by Ukraine, the Treaty on Friendship, Cooperation, and Partnership between the Russian Federation and Ukraine from May 31st, 1997. Point 12 of the agreement reads: “The High Agreeing Parties shall protect the ethnic, cultural, linguistic, and religious identities of national minorities on their territory and create conditions for the fostering of their identity….they will contribute to creating equal opportunities and conditions for studying the Russian language in Ukraine and the Ukrainian language in the Russian Federation, training pedagogical staff for teaching these languages in educational establishments, and for these purposes, provide equal state support.”
Points 1-2 of the agreement are based on the recognition of the friendly relations between the countries and their territorial integrity. Hence why the agreement is often called a border treaty. For Ukraine, whose territorial sovereignty over some territories (including Galicia, which was part of the Second Polish Republic until September 1939) is quite disputed, this agreement was a real gift. It is no coincidence that a number of patriotic politicians in Russia, demanded that this document not be signed.
Russia’s recognition of Kiev’s sovereignty over territories included in the Ukrainian state is founded on Ukraine’s observance of the rights of its Russian- cultured citizens. After the coup d’etat in 2014, Ukraine began pursuing a policy of cultural genocide (ethnocide) against the Russian-cultured population.
Now Ukraine is discussing the initiative of the scandalously infamous politician Irina Farion, to deprive Russian residents in Ukraine of civil rights.
In fact, this measure is already being implemented. The number of Russian schools has rapidly declined while Russian organizations are being prosecuted and their activities are under close surveillance by Kiev’s intelligence services.
In accordance with the 1997 treaty, an entire network of federal & regional organizations of Ukrainians is funded in Russia. For example, in the Rostov region there is a city-level and regional national-cultural autonomy of Ukrainians.
The organization receives funding from the city and regional budgets. Its head, the businessman Makarchuk, is a member of the Public Chamber of the Rostov region and is proud of his friendship with Rostov governor Vasili Golubev. Meanwhile, Makarchuk is published on the website of the Ukrainian neo-Nazi Svoboda party and frequently makes Russophobic statements.
Unfortunately, Russia is largely to blame for the fact that the civil rights of Russian-cultured people in Ukraine are being massively violated. An example of this is the patronizing policy of Rostov region's authorities. But on the federal level as well, the state does not make sufficient (or any) efforts to defend the Russian population of Ukraine (nearly half of the country’s total population).
Meanwhile, a more responsible attitude towards obligations would lead to discussion of the 1997 treaty. In a situation in which the second country (Ukraine), massively violates the treaty’s basic premises, then Russia has the right to withdraw from the treaty with all the legal and political implications. I see no reason for the Russian budget to support the activities of Ukrainian organizations in Russia, or recognize the territorial sovereignty of Ukraine.
____________________________________
WHITE HELMETS -- SHAM
The Ron Paul Institute has pointed out: “We have demonstrated that the White Helmets are an integral part of the propaganda van- guard, that ensures obscurantism of fact and propagation of Human Rights fiction that elicits the well-intentioned and self righteous response from a very cleverly duped public. A priority for these NGOs is to keep pushing the No Fly Zone scenario which has already been seen to have disastrous implications for innocent civilians in Libya, for example.”
What better chance to push “the No Fly Zone scenario” than arriving within “moments” of the convoy tragedy, filming it and creating a propaganda scenario before any meaningful forensic investigation could even be started, since the trucks were still burning. And of course, the “White Helmets”, aka “Syrian Defence Force”, were filming, rather than attempting to put out the fire and rescue those in the burning trucks.
[Ed. Yet the UK's Guardian, that snivelling wreckage of a "Liberal" newspaper, lies, & describes them as "the White Helmets, a volunteer rescue group," quotes their accusations of Syrian & Russian "constant bombing of civilians" and calls for a "no-fly-zone" now --- as in Libya.]
The Russian Defence Ministry subsequently caused outrage by claiming that their Drone footage: “shows the bombed Syrian aid convoy included a truck full of militant fighters carrying mortar guns.”
However: “The footage emerged as the United Nations rowed back from describing the attack on the aid convoy as air strikes, saying it did not have conclusive evidence about what had happened.”
It must be asked, why on earth, after long and protracted negotiations over the convoy would Syria and or their Russian ally risk the wrath of the US & “coalition”, and of further decimation of the country, by laying themselves open to accusations of bombing aid convoys?
The tragedy has emphatically achieved 1 thing, however. Wiped from the headlines, is another atrocity - the US bombing which killed over 60 Syrian soldiers and wounded over 100 others, just two days earlier, on Saturday 17th Sept. - causing Russian Foreign Ministry spokes- woman Maria Zakharova, to comment: “We are reaching a really terrifying conclusion for the whole world: That the White House is defending Islamic State. Now there can be no doubts about that”, according to the RIA Novosti news agency.
Again - Quis custodiet ipsos custodes? Who will guard the guards?
___________________________________
US prepares an Islamic army in Kosovo
Pravda.Ru - The US is preparing a reserve echelon in the territory of its Kosova enclave. But to keep a secure strategic space, the Southern Serbian provinces may be separated from Kosovo. Given the total apathy of the authorities of Republika Srpska... this plan is inching closer to its implementation.
The goal of the Americans is clear: if Berlin's discontent ousts US bases from Germany, after all, the US will have a spot in Kosovo. It's no secret that the crime and terrorist mayhem plaguing Kosovo, is under the patronage of the US.
Yelena Guskova, a Senator, and member of the Academy of Sciences of the Republika Srpska (Bosnia and Herzegovina), honoured with many Russian and Serbian state awards, commented to Pravda.Ru on this matter, in an interview.
Former Commander of the French foreign legion in Kosovo -- General Jacques Ogar, has recently confirmed to Pravda.Ru, evidence obtained from confidential US sources -- that there are at least five ISIS training camps in Kosovo, which are preparing suicide bombers and an army of Islamists to conquer Europe.
Having found no evidence that proved Milosevic was guilty, the Hague tribunal exonerated him. What do you think of it?
Slobodan Milosevic is a very significant historical person in Serbia's modern history, and the whole of Yugoslavia. In the early 1990s he was seen as the last communist in Europe -- who should be annihilated. His own country turned him over to the Hague; the so-called new government -- after the colour revolution of 2000.
However he was a leader who defended his country and the truth. He combated a large amount of lies at the Tribunal, which tried to prove that only the Serbs were guilty of all the events of the 1990s, as they were charged with collective crimes.
No leader of the Muslim territories of Yugoslavia was convicted, only Serbian ones. The figure of Milosevic was very important, but they didn't manage to find any evidence.
His brother Borislav Milosevic says they secretly took some samples of food and water Slobodan had been given and tested it in Moscow. And it turned out that poison had been added. And it was difficult to breathe for him, which means that something was infiltrated into the air.
Then he stopped eating, but the process had been launched. His death is mysterious but the Tribunal admitted that he was not responsible for crimes in Bosnia and Herzegovina.
Colonel Jacques Ogar, who was Commander of a foreign legion in the territory of Yugoslavia in the UN group admits that they were ordered to stand for the Kosovars against the Serbians... Western troops openly supported separatists and participated in punitive actions against the Serbians. Do you have such data?
Surely. I'm a Head of the Centre for the Study of the Contemporary Balkan Crisis at the Russian Academy of Sciences. Our main task is to collect documents and publish them. There occur more and more documents on the events since 1990, which confirm it.
It's absolutely clear that international organizations were biased. The Albanians approach their dream - to create a big country with an Albanian population only. The US has worked a lot to support this movement, as Kosovo is a project of the US.
And they would have got independence long ago, unless it was for Russia. Russia said No to their plans in 2007. it disturbed them, and now they do not influence Russia, but try to govern the Serbian authorities. But I think the process hasn't been completed, & there's a chance to return Kosovo to Serbia.
As they say, there are 8 ISIS training camps in the territory of Kosovo. It is reported that they train suicide bombers to carry out acts in the Western Europe and create a whole army to conquer it. How can you comment on this?
When huge flows of refugees were going across the Balkans in Europe, there were mainly young men and almost no couples. They were well- dressed, were going by three, and had enough means to live in decent hotels. It is clear that there are those among them who should stay in the Balkans & orchestrate implementation of their leaders' aims.
As the Serbian officials struggle to join the EU, they implemented all the terms. And they were told, to not only to let in these refugees, but also to build camps for them. Many stayed in the South, where the population is majority Muslim . A great quantity went to Kosovo and Metohija.
And there's an uncontrolled NATO base Bondsteel there, where enormous resources are deployed. This territory is not controlled by anyone. And when questions of the US military camps in Europe occur, no one speaks of Kosovo.
In Kosovo's camps, where terrorists are trained, they are set absolutely free. It's very dangerous for the whole of Europe, and the Balkans first of all. The US, though, wants to whip Serbia into submission and recognize the independence of Kosovo and Metohija.
In Bosnia and Herzegovina and the Republika Srpska, and Serbians who reside there, are hampering these plans.
There is evidence that, as early as in the mid- 1990s the US aimed to go down to the Balkans when the agreement with Germany terminated if they had to leave. They need a territory in Bosnia & Herzegovina, in Kosovo, Metohija, Montenegro, Serbia & Macedonia. Republika Srpska hampers implementation of this plan today.
They need to annihilate the Republic and make the whole of Bosnia and Herzegovina a unitary state. They didn't manage to conduct a colour revolution in the Republika Srpska, while the terror acts, which may be backed by Muslims in other territories, may be fruitful.
These plans may come forward in the nearest future, and it's a threat for the whole of Serbia. As there is a plan to separate the Southern regions of Serbia, where a lot of Albanians and Muslims reside. Today Serbian officials regard these refugees calmly, as well as capable of possible terrorist acts. But it should be paid 'special attention'.
there's a big difference between the news, and the truth - if you want the latest news and the truth, say, on Brazil - then please go to our One Union page.
________________________________
US/UK elite bankrolled A. Hitler
Germans were paid in company shares for loans that managed Germany's war reparations -- thus US capital began to actively integrate into the German economy.
The total amount of foreign investment in German industry during 1924-1929 amounted to almost 63 billion gold Marks (30 billion was accounted for by loans), and the payment of reparations — 10 billion Marks. 70% of revenues were provided by bankers from the US, and most banks were from JP Morgan.
As a result, in 1929, German industry was in second place in the world, but it was largely in the hands of the USA's leading financial-industrial groups.
"Interessen-Gemeinschaft Farbenindustrie", main supplier of the German war machine, financed 45% of the election campaign of Hitler in 1930, and was under the control of Rockefeller's "Standard oil".
Morgan, through "General Electric", controlled the German radio and electrical industry, via AEG and Siemens (up to 1933, 30% of the shares of AEG were owned by "General Electric") and through the Telecom company ITT — 40% of the 'phone network in Germany.
In addition, they owned a 30% stake in the air- craft manufacturing company "Focke-Wulf".
"General Motors", belonging to the DuPont family, established control over "Opel".
Henry Ford controlled 100% of the shares of Volkswagen. In 1926, with the participation of the Rockefeller Bank, Dillon, Reed & Co, the second largest industrial monopoly in Germany, after I.G Farben, merged with metals group, "Vereinigte Stahlwerke" (Steel trust) plus Thyssen, Flick, Wolff, Feglera etc.
US co-operation with Germany's military- industrial complex, was so intense and pervasive, that by 1933, the key sectors of German industry, & large banks such as the Deutsche Bank, Dresdner Bank, Donat Bank, etc, were all under the control of US financial capital.
The political force that was intended to play a crucial role in the Anglo-American plans was being simultaneously prepared.
We are talking about the funding of the Nazi party and A. Hitler personally.
As former German Chancellor Brüning wrote in his memoirs, from 1923, Hitler received large sums from abroad. Where they went, is not known, but they were received through Swiss and Swedish banks.
It is also known that, in 1922 in Munich, a meeting took place between A. Hitler and the military attache of the US to Germany -- Captain Truman Smith -- who compiled a detailed report for his Washington superiors (in the office of military intelligence), in which he spoke highly of Hitler.
Through Smith's circle of acquaintances, A. Hitler was introduced to Ernst Franz Sedgwick Hanfstaengl, (Putzie), --- a graduate of Harvard University who played an important role in the formation of A. Hitler as a politician, rendered him significant financial support, and secured for him, acquaintance & communication with, senior British figures.
Hitler was prepared politically, but, as Germany reigned in prosperity, his party remained on the periphery of public life... The situation changed dramatically with the beginning of 'the crisis'.
In the autumn of 1929, the collapse of the US stock exchange was triggered by the Federal Reserve, and the next stage of the Anglo-US financial circles' strategy, had started.
The Federal Reserve and JP Morgan, decided to stop lending to Germany --- inspired by the bank crisis & economic depression in Central Europe.
In September 1931, England abandoned the gold standard, deliberately destroying international payments systems and completely cutting off "financial oxygen" to the Weimar Republic.
But a financial miracle occurred for the Nazi party: in September 1930 as a result of large donations by Thyssen and I.G. Farben --- the party got 6.4 million votes & took 2nd place in the Reichstag;- after this, more generous investments from abroad were activated.
The main link between the major German industrialists and foreign financiers, became H. Schacht.
On January 4th, 1932, a meeting was held with the largest English financier, a Mr M. Norman, A. Hitler, and von Papen, which concluded a secret agreement on the financing of the NSDAP.
This meeting was also attended by US policy-makers, the Dulles brothers --- something their biographers do not like to mention.
On January 14th, 1933, a meeting between Hitler, Schroder, Papen & Kepler took place, where Hitler's program was fully approved. It was here that they finally resolved the issue of the transfer of power to the Nazis, and on 30th January, A. Hitler became Chancellor.
The implementation of the next stage of the strategy thus began.
The attitude of Anglo-American ruling circles to the new government was very sympathetic. When Hitler refused to pay reparations, which naturally called into question the payment of war debts, neither the UK or France pressed their payment claims.
Moreover, after a visit to the US in May 1933, H. Schacht was placed, again, at the head of the Reichsbank, and, after his meeting with the President and the biggest bankers on Wall Street, the US allocated Germany new loans --- totalling $1 billion.
In June, during a trip to London & a meeting with M. Norman, Schacht sought an English loan of $2 billion and a reduction and then the cessation of payments, on old loans.
Thus, the Nazis got what they could not achieve with the previous government.
In the summer of 1934, Britain signed the Anglo- German transfer agreement, which became one of the foundations of British policy towards the Third Reich, &, at the end of the 30's, Germany became the main trading partner of England.
Schroeder Bank became Germany's main agent in the UK & in 1936 his New York office teamed up with the Rockefellers, to create Schroeder, Rockefeller & Co. investment Bank, which the Times magazine called the Berlin-Rome "economic propagandist axis".
As Hitler himself admitted, he conceived his 4- year plan on the basis of foreign financial loans, so it never inspired him with the slightest alarm.
In August 1934, US Standard oil acquired 730,000 acres of land in Germany... then built large oil refineries which supplied the Nazis with oil.
At the same time, Germany secretly took delivery of the most modern equipment for aircraft factories, from the US, which would begin producing German planes.
Germany gained large numbers of military patents from US firms Pratt and Whitney, Douglas, and Curtis Wright --- and it was US technology, building the Junkers-87.
In 1941 --- as world war ll was raging --- US investments in Germany's economy amounted to $475 million. Standard oil invested - 120 million, General motors - $35 million, ITT - $30 million, and Ford - $17.5 million.
The close financial & economic co-operation of Anglo-American and Nazi business circles, was the backdrop against which, in the 30's, a policy of appeasement led to world war II.
Today, as the world's financial elite begins to implement the 'Great depression 2' plan with its subsequent transition to the "new world order", identifying its key role in the organization of crimes against humanity, becomes a priority.
Yuri Rubtsov is a doctor of historical sciences, academician of the Academy of military sciences, & a member of the International Association of historians of world war II.
US WARNS AGAINST IAEA MOVE ON ISRAEL
The US is protesting at a report by the IAEA voicing concern over Israel's clandestine nuclear program & its potential capability.
"Israel's fully cooperated with the IAEA," a State Department spokesperson says.
They note that Washington believes that the agency is "not the forum" to discuss Israel's accession to the nuclear Non- Proliferation Treaty.
"We believe there is really no basis for a debate at the IAEA," they insist. In Washington's view, any IAEA step is unnecessary since it could..........
"interrupt progress we think is possible now we're back into direct negotiations" between Israel & the Palestinian Authority.
What the US might be forgetting is that all states in the world & all in the Middle East want Israel in the NPT, and a nuclear-free Middle East.
The Egyptian government, on behalf of all the Non-Alignment Movement states, demands that there be an exhaustive report on Israel's nuclear arsenals.
The Tel Aviv regime refuses to confirm or deny possessing nuclear weapons but is widely believed to possess over 200 nuclear warheads.
Having endorsed Israel's policy of "nuclear ambiguity" for 40 years, the US is warning the Arab states against renewing efforts to focus on Israel, at the next IAEA meeting.
FREE POLITICAL PRISONER LEONARD PELTIER NOW!!!
Indigenous rights activist Leonard Peltier,
in prison in the US for 38 years, received the first international human rights prize of Uruguay's Mario Benedetti Foundation.
At a ceremony in Montevideo, where the winner was announced, the human rights group calls Peltier the longest-serving political prisoner in the Americas, AFP reports.
Peltier, a Native American activist who was a member of the American Indian Movement (AIM), was convicted in 1977 for the alleged murder of two US FBI agents during a 1975 shootout on the
Pine Ridge Reservation in S. Dakota.
He was sentenced to 2 consecutive terms of life imprisonment.
"Leonard Peltier, who on September 12th, 2014, turned 70, has spent over half his life in prison. He's a symbol of resistance to repressive state policies by the US, where there are people in jail for ethnic, racial, religious & ideological reasons," the foundation's statement says.
Ricardo Elena, a member of the foundation's honorary board, says Peltier's case "is one that is repeated over and over: violation (of rights), persecution, eviction, invasion and expropriation of indigenous people, from the time it was 'discovered', until now.
"It doesn't just happen in the United States; it is happening in southern South America, with the (indigenous) Mapuche people, and with indigenous people in North America," he states.
Elena says the United States "likes to think it's the seat of democracy, but it has political prisoners just like a dictatorship might have."
The Mario Benedetti Foundation was founded to support human rights and cultural causes in line with the work of the Uruguayan writer after whom it was named, who died in 2009.
Peltier is incarcerated at the United States Penitentiary, Lewisburg, Pennsylvania.
James Swan, the head of the Black Hills chapter of the United Urban Warrior Society - a nonprofit group that helps Native Americans fight racial discrimination and injustice - describes Peltier as a political prisoner whose case needs to be reviewed by an independent body.
"What we want people to realize is that this is an injustice," AP quotes Swan as saying.
Peltier, 66, was given two life sentences in '77, on false charges of killing 2 FBI agents.
Peltier asserts that he is innocent and the FBI framed him for political reasons, especially for his activities as a member of the Native American Movement. He has lodged numerous appeals against the conviction - but all unsuccessfully.
He's been denied parole again and again, and will not be eligible for it again until 2024, when he turns 79.
Peltier's relatives say he suffers a number of health problems such as diabetes, arthritis, and the loss of vision in an eye after a minor stroke.
Many activists say Leonard Peltier is the most important political prisoner in the US.
In a review of the US' human rights record, at a United Nations Human Rights Council UPR conference in Geneva, a group called for a new trial for him.
The US Human Rights Network filed a 423-page submission to the Geneva meeting about him.
One item, entitled “Political Repression - Political Prisoners,” about 1970's cases, indicts the FBI: accusing COINTELPRO of “maiming, murdering, false prosecutions and frame-ups, destruction and mayhem throughout the country.”
It cites the FBI for targeting the Puerto Rican Independence Front, the Black Panther Party, the Weather Underground, the American Indian Movement, the Black Liberation Army, as well as “peace activists and everyone in between,” and says “many of today's political prisoners” in the US were jailed indefinitely as a result.
Repression has grown since 9/11, it says.
The political repression paper demands an “immediate criminal investigation into the conspiracy,” and also new trials for two aged activists jailed on murder charges, Mumia Abu Jamal and Leonard Peltier.